bothamsfearnley wrote:We earnt our result all year mate...
hahahahaa.... knew someone would bite!


by duck-mann » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:16 am
bothamsfearnley wrote:We earnt our result all year mate...
by bothamsfearnley » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:20 am
duck-mann wrote:bothamsfearnley wrote:We earnt our result all year mate...
hahahahaa.... knew someone would bite!![]()
by skywalker » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:23 am
sports follower wrote:skywalker wrote:Grand Finals
Grade 6
Two Wells (A) vs Craigmore (C) @ Two Wells - Two Wells should win, but if Galway makes runs and Walker takes wickets, Craigmore could upset.
Craigmore are more than a 2 player team, this was proved last weekend when Galway didnt make many runs and Walker didnt take many wickets. It will take a team effort to knock off Two Wells A Grade.
by rainbow warrior » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:44 am
cricket1012010 wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Spot on 84
yeh ok it doesnt matter who made runs its a team game.... so in that case if there no.10 and no.11 made 74 runs each westies still deserved to win?? even tho r&c bowling attack got the best of there batters??
by sports follower » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:50 am
skywalker wrote:sports follower wrote:skywalker wrote:Grand Finals
Grade 6
Two Wells (A) vs Craigmore (C) @ Two Wells - Two Wells should win, but if Galway makes runs and Walker takes wickets, Craigmore could upset.
Craigmore are more than a 2 player team, this was proved last weekend when Galway didnt make many runs and Walker didnt take many wickets. It will take a team effort to knock off Two Wells A Grade.
Point taken... was only going by season stats really. Only two names in that team I recognise from my playing days anyway. Cricket is a team game, but individuals can play a big role on any given day. Am surprised a rersult was even reached. Looks the only game that got play on 2nd play.
by bothamsfearnley » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:41 am
by cokadonkeytoo » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:55 am
bothamsfearnley wrote:Taken from the Barossa forum -
does t.lee suffer from small man syndrome? quite an appalling display of sportsmanship from 4 of your 2nd eleven today that wouldnt turn up for the shield and medal presentations. sour grapes, we were the best team all year and still very confident of a win 2day. we only lost one game all year and u boys didnt get close to us so take it on the chin and get over it.
Some things never change....
by bothamsfearnley » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:37 pm
cokadonkeytoo wrote:bothamsfearnley wrote:Taken from the Barossa forum -
does t.lee suffer from small man syndrome? quite an appalling display of sportsmanship from 4 of your 2nd eleven today that wouldnt turn up for the shield and medal presentations. sour grapes, we were the best team all year and still very confident of a win 2day. we only lost one game all year and u boys didnt get close to us so take it on the chin and get over it.
Some things never change....
are you kidding me!!! mate if you only knew timmy he is one of the best blokes going around, yes he gets very worked up over his cricket and has the white line fever like many of us do. this weekends game was possibly going to be his last ever game and to have it robbed from him by circumstances you wouldnt know was hard for him to swallow. i know he had a run in with your boys previously but get to know him off field before you make statements like the above
by cokadonkeytoo » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:45 pm
bothamsfearnley wrote:cokadonkeytoo wrote:bothamsfearnley wrote:Taken from the Barossa forum -
does t.lee suffer from small man syndrome? quite an appalling display of sportsmanship from 4 of your 2nd eleven today that wouldnt turn up for the shield and medal presentations. sour grapes, we were the best team all year and still very confident of a win 2day. we only lost one game all year and u boys didnt get close to us so take it on the chin and get over it.
Some things never change....
are you kidding me!!! mate if you only knew timmy he is one of the best blokes going around, yes he gets very worked up over his cricket and has the white line fever like many of us do. this weekends game was possibly going to be his last ever game and to have it robbed from him by circumstances you wouldnt know was hard for him to swallow. i know he had a run in with your boys previously but get to know him off field before you make statements like the above
Would the kind of person he is off the field make any difference to the way he goes about his cricket? I am happy to take your word that he is a good bloke off the field - I'm not questioning that - but its his onfield behaviour that once again gets mentioned. I am sorry you disagree but I stand by it.
by bothamsfearnley » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:57 pm
cokadonkeytoo wrote:bothamsfearnley wrote:cokadonkeytoo wrote:bothamsfearnley wrote:Taken from the Barossa forum -
does t.lee suffer from small man syndrome? quite an appalling display of sportsmanship from 4 of your 2nd eleven today that wouldnt turn up for the shield and medal presentations. sour grapes, we were the best team all year and still very confident of a win 2day. we only lost one game all year and u boys didnt get close to us so take it on the chin and get over it.
Some things never change....
are you kidding me!!! mate if you only knew timmy he is one of the best blokes going around, yes he gets very worked up over his cricket and has the white line fever like many of us do. this weekends game was possibly going to be his last ever game and to have it robbed from him by circumstances you wouldnt know was hard for him to swallow. i know he had a run in with your boys previously but get to know him off field before you make statements like the above
Would the kind of person he is off the field make any difference to the way he goes about his cricket? I am happy to take your word that he is a good bloke off the field - I'm not questioning that - but its his onfield behaviour that once again gets mentioned. I am sorry you disagree but I stand by it.
thats fair enough i guess
interesting note from that game was the association president playing for Angaston in the A2 grand final. Angaston all out 108 with sandy creek 4/59 overnight, that game never saw a ball bowled while the A1 and A1 Res all got play underway. Hmmmm sounds fishy, that could be why he left in such disgust and obviously days knows the president of the association on a very personal level
by crowzanddogz » Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:35 pm
by Browny25 » Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:58 pm
crowzanddogz wrote:DIV 5 salisbury north vs virginia virginia won the toss and elected 2 bat and batted extremely well 2 make 348 whilst another div 5 club (NO NAMES INC) continued 2 frustrate both umpires and the fielding side with constant abuse which was way over the top!! salisbury north had 2 bat for 11 overs and were 1/27 overnight until the constant rain on sunday allowed no play and salisbury north were announced premiers around 4 oclock!! noone likes 2 win premierships like that but their the rules we play under and every1 knows from the start of the season the process so its no reason 2 winge when it rains!!
by custardarm » Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:15 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:43 pm
cokadonkeytoo wrote:bothamsfearnley wrote:cokadonkeytoo wrote:bothamsfearnley wrote:Taken from the Barossa forum -
does t.lee suffer from small man syndrome? quite an appalling display of sportsmanship from 4 of your 2nd eleven today that wouldnt turn up for the shield and medal presentations. sour grapes, we were the best team all year and still very confident of a win 2day. we only lost one game all year and u boys didnt get close to us so take it on the chin and get over it.
Some things never change....
are you kidding me!!! mate if you only knew timmy he is one of the best blokes going around, yes he gets very worked up over his cricket and has the white line fever like many of us do. this weekends game was possibly going to be his last ever game and to have it robbed from him by circumstances you wouldnt know was hard for him to swallow. i know he had a run in with your boys previously but get to know him off field before you make statements like the above
Would the kind of person he is off the field make any difference to the way he goes about his cricket? I am happy to take your word that he is a good bloke off the field - I'm not questioning that - but its his onfield behaviour that once again gets mentioned. I am sorry you disagree but I stand by it.
thats fair enough i guess
interesting note from that game was the association president playing for Angaston in the A2 grand final. Angaston all out 108 with sandy creek 4/59 overnight, that game never saw a ball bowled while the A1 and A1 Res all got play underway. Hmmmm sounds fishy, that could be why he left in such disgust and obviously days knows the president of the association on a very personal level
by Wizard of Oz » Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:50 pm
custardarm wrote:just a thought for the wizard of oz , surely salisbury west considered having joint premiers as the game was a draw as i believe in the past that a similar situation resulted in an extraordinary meeting of pdca officials to see the rules amended so as to ensure a joint premiership, im sorry but with R&C's stellar day one performance it would have been good to see sw do the right thing and offer to share the spoils with R&C who were forced to in ridiculous circumstances previously , just a thought
by cricket1012010 » Mon Mar 29, 2010 7:37 pm
custardarm wrote:just a thought for the wizard of oz , surely salisbury west considered having joint premiers as the game was a draw as i believe in the past that a similar situation resulted in an extraordinary meeting of pdca officials to see the rules amended so as to ensure a joint premiership, im sorry but with R&C's stellar day one performance it would have been good to see sw do the right thing and offer to share the spoils with R&C who were forced to in ridiculous circumstances previously , just a thought
by Wizard of Oz » Mon Mar 29, 2010 7:44 pm
cricket1012010 wrote:custardarm wrote:just a thought for the wizard of oz , surely salisbury west considered having joint premiers as the game was a draw as i believe in the past that a similar situation resulted in an extraordinary meeting of pdca officials to see the rules amended so as to ensure a joint premiership, im sorry but with R&C's stellar day one performance it would have been good to see sw do the right thing and offer to share the spoils with R&C who were forced to in ridiculous circumstances previously , just a thought
spot on
by Mr Miraculous » Mon Mar 29, 2010 7:48 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:custardarm wrote:just a thought for the wizard of oz , surely salisbury west considered having joint premiers as the game was a draw as i believe in the past that a similar situation resulted in an extraordinary meeting of pdca officials to see the rules amended so as to ensure a joint premiership, im sorry but with R&C's stellar day one performance it would have been good to see sw do the right thing and offer to share the spoils with R&C who were forced to in ridiculous circumstances previously , just a thought
spot on
Well maybe South Australia should offer Western Australia the 1995/96 Sheffield Shield too ?
by Wizard of Oz » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:18 pm
rainbow warrior wrote:cricket1012010 wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:Spot on 84
yeh ok it doesnt matter who made runs its a team game.... so in that case if there no.10 and no.11 made 74 runs each westies still deserved to win?? even tho r&c bowling attack got the best of there batters??
Yes if they are noit good enough to also get out the no 10 and no 11 and get punished for it perhaps they dont deserve to win. HAve to play a whole innings not jsut a part innings. Many teams have lost in the past with lower order partnerships making the difference. Have won and lost games with this type of situation.
by buckley05 » Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:33 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |