Yes (I'm a Magpie member) :
(20)
50%
Yes (non-member) :
(0)
0%
Yes (North fan) :
(0)
0%
Yes (Neutral observer) :
(20)
50%
Total votes: 40




by bayman » Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:32 pm
by robranisgod » Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:53 pm
by LBJ8 » Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:09 pm
robranisgod wrote:Given Rucci's latest revelations, it should be perfectly safe for North supporters to go this week, but I wouldn't be so sure about when the Bays have to venture down there.
by bayman » Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:25 pm
by Squawk » Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:45 pm
by dedja » Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:48 pm
robranisgod wrote:Given Rucci's latest revelations, it should be perfectly safe for North supporters to go this week, but I wouldn't be so sure about when the Bays have to venture down there.
by robranisgod » Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:43 pm
LBJ23 wrote:robranisgod wrote:Given Rucci's latest revelations, it should be perfectly safe for North supporters to go this week, but I wouldn't be so sure about when the Bays have to venture down there.
maybe it should be safe but i don't think that's the way most Port supporters would see it, i don't think Rucci's article comes close to how much North got dumped in it when the decision was being made, not saying it is correct or not, just saying...
by Wedgie » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:01 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Pseudo » Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:37 pm
Wedgie wrote:Yep, usual sea of red in the outer, we didn't have one Port supporter near us although there was Port fan I noticed on the way to the loo who was bald on top and had dreadlocks, that was a sight!
We reckon he should have a dreadlock combover!
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:43 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |