by blood bath » Sat May 22, 2010 9:33 pm
by bloods08 » Sat May 22, 2010 9:35 pm
blood bath wrote:The umpiring went to new lows today. I have never seen a ruckman penalised for jumping too high!
1st Quarter, centre wing in front on the interchange, Webb runs on from the bench, jumps and hangs in the air over O'Hara, and wins the taps, yet North awared a free for too high (was all leap, no hands). Whats the game coming to?
North were more determined and seemed to be playing for each other. Again, West outskilled in a match that they were certainly in with a chance. We need to claim another big scalp, with Sturt a 4 point game this week so to speak.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat May 22, 2010 9:49 pm
blood bath wrote:The umpiring went to new lows today. I have never seen a ruckman penalised for jumping too high!
by stampy » Sat May 22, 2010 10:05 pm
by bloods08 » Sat May 22, 2010 10:23 pm
stampy wrote:cant believe the tripe i am reading in this thread
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat May 22, 2010 11:20 pm
by Wedgie » Sat May 22, 2010 11:34 pm
bloods08 wrote:stampy wrote:cant believe the tripe i am reading in this thread
Yeah agree. Looks like no-one can have an opinion without being jumped upon.
And before anyone starts I'm guilty as well.
Apologies guys.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat May 22, 2010 11:44 pm
by JK » Sat May 22, 2010 11:45 pm
by bloods08 » Sat May 22, 2010 11:50 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Far out, I would have thought either side of 3000 at least for these teams .. Both are well supported with plenty to play for
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat May 22, 2010 11:53 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Far out, I would have thought either side of 3000 at least for these teams .. Both are well supported with plenty to play for
by JK » Sat May 22, 2010 11:53 pm
bloods08 wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Far out, I would have thought either side of 3000 at least for these teams .. Both are well supported with plenty to play for
I'm not sure you would say we're well supported.
We usually have about 400-500 travelling band of supporters and thats about it.
Very disappointed with the North contingent though. Usually the grandstands are almost full and the terracing in front of the grandstands is usually chocas. Had plenty of room to move today.
Thats what you get though when your team isn't playing well though as we all know.
by JK » Sat May 22, 2010 11:54 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Far out, I would have thought either side of 3000 at least for these teams .. Both are well supported with plenty to play for
LOL. Normally draw a crowd of 1500-1900.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat May 22, 2010 11:55 pm
bloods08 wrote:We usually have about 400-500 travelling band of supporters and thats about it.
by Thiele » Sun May 23, 2010 12:00 am
by bulldog2004 » Sun May 23, 2010 2:45 am
bloods08 wrote:whufc wrote:bloods08 wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Typical, no credit for North's win.
Obviously missed my bit about Jimmy Allan (who I must add is the best player in the comp).
North were good today but will struggle to challenge the likes of Central, Glenelg and the Eagles over the course of the season (just like us)
Ok ill bite.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
Please place in best jokes thread.
Obviously haven't seen a few lads running around in a red, white and blue jumper.
Your post has topped off another brilliant day of football for me, thankyou.
You really are a tool. I said he is the best player in the competition. Centrals have the best bunch of players in the competition.
by CENTURION » Sun May 23, 2010 10:13 am
Thiele wrote:Did the Pram Lady get banned from the Sanfl hadnt seen her for a long time until today
by Adam4 » Sun May 23, 2010 1:22 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun May 23, 2010 1:27 pm
Adam4 wrote:Every winning side is made to look better by the looser!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |