You're assuming Old Scholar teams don't pay.

I don't think we need death of any kind.

There can only be one winner, sometimes you just get beaten by better teams.

Dog_ger wrote:Time to think nuke guys.

Starting with Salisbury Downs.

morell wrote:Or a certain coach that doesn't play him in the right way or spot.

If I had a dollar every time time a forward said that when he couldn't get a kick..,.

"My opponent is beating me, move me into the middle" is basically what you're saying morell

The first rule of control is to create fear.

morell wrote:Really? I think it should be to win

A coach's responsibility is to keep the players who don't like him away from the players who haven't made their mind up whether they like him.

stan wrote:Spring. I rate spring.

Yup...aside from the hayfever.

If Beams goes we truly will be ******.

Couple of kicks away from D4. No premierships, but only someone with a chip on their shoulder would say Zwecky underachieved

Ceglar would be gutted.

All forwards are sooky-la-las

How bloody good was that coaching doco they just showed on CH7?! You rarely get to see that stuff.

It's nice to see they still trot out the same clichés we use in ammos

Can you value family time lost strain on relationship with loved one sometimes we forget the price of picking the club first

I would never coach way to much down time easier to play

If and individual puts being an amateur league coach ahead his family and marital relationship... it would make me question his thinking and his ability to make informed judgements. Good coaches wouldn't place a $$$ value against their family when holding their hand out.

Depends who is the judge.

If you ask my wife, anything more than zero minutes spent at football is putting time ahead of family.

You are not authorised to read this forum.

Pup wrote:

Brodlach wrote:3AW reporting that Jason Winderlich to continue playing next season but not at Essendon

Hmm wow.

Things at Essendon are going to get very ugly

It was ugly a year ago.

Now it's Rosie O'Donnell's queef.

Personally, I love any excuse to get in costume. Must be a generational thing, because I'm not alone.

The Dark Knight wrote:

Jim05 wrote:Frawley officially a Hawk now

I don't understand why Hawthorn would pick up a bloke with below average foot skills, goes against their whole gameplan. And what position will he play for them? Back or Forward?

The real travesty will be if Melbourne get Pick 4 compensation for that hack.

Sherrin wrote:Crows pick 10 to Brisbane for Aish, Brisbane pick 10 to Collingwood for Beams. Collingwood get a top 10 pick, Brisbane keep pick 4, Crows get home grown player one year down the track who himself was pick 7 and cover need for an outside mid

Pick 10 for Beams?! U ******* wot m8?!

Well I watched the final Breaking Bad ep last night. What to watch now? I could always extricate myself out of my chair and go and do something - but suffice it to say there will be a gap in my life now with no more Walter White exploits.

if you havent seen it, go watch the wire, game of thrones, or house of cards

Been watching The Wire again. GOAT cop series.

Silliest silly season evah!

its pick 5.

still seems overs for beams imo.

Will be Brisbane's highest paid player and you reckon they're getting the bad deal... Okay buddy

still doesnt mean he is worth pick 5 and the number 7 draft pick who seems to be on course to be as good as beams

reckon pick 5 and a best 22 non superstar seems about right

so you would take 5 + "a nobody" for Dangerfield?

bennymacca wrote:beams is not dangerfield. beams is good but he doesnt win games off his own boot (the way danger or pendles do for instance)

Beams was as good as Danger this year. And Beams is younger.

We digress though. Danger is a gun. Beams is a gun.

Adelaide wouldn't let themselves get bent over in a trade with Danger. That's my point.

carey wrote:The Village on a Thursday night

Yesssss! Dollar beers rekt me. We probably got in fight with each other and never knew it.

smac wrote:

Q. wrote:

Bully wrote:billy boy still wanting the carbon tax i see today yes ?

When do I see all that extra cash from repealing of said tax?

Just after the increase from its implementation is seen.

So, basically I ain't notice jack shit

smac wrote:Only inside-out

But the print will chafe my nipples

"Bulldogs president Peter Gordon appeared on SEN this morning, describing Ryan Griffen as the most credentialed player up for trade since Gary Ablett."

Bwahahaha!

Look Good In Leather wrote:What was consensus on that North Haven King Hit?

Was more of a Queen hit.

^^^ you make a good point, this is probably only penalising the players in low grades who want a change in scenery.

And assumes that most blokes only have two mates.

my reaction to our entire trade period thus far:

Collingwood the big winners in that trade, pick 5 and Crisp is plenty for Beams, to get the bonus of pick 25 to snare Greenwood is the icing.
Crisp will be in their best 10 players by the end of the year

If Crisp is in our best 10 then we must be shit.

Hate to tell you this, but they might be ...

No, no, we know we're going to be shit. But we must be even more shit than we thought.

If we trade in Varcoe, we will plumb to new depths of shitness.

bennymacca wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:waking up to Coldplay on the radio this morning AND copping the freight train on the way to work.

There is no God.

unless it was their first album, which is insanely good.

That's nice, what music does your husband listen to?

Dutchy wrote:Who wins this monstrosity of a trade?

Brisbane by the length of the Flemington straight.

#6 and Griffen for Boyd? Dogs got screwed.

adr107 wrote:

Q. wrote:

adr107 wrote:So, when is pre season?

I started three weeks ago buddy

Do Thursday beers count as pre season?

Nothing 'pre' about that. That'd be all-season training.

Footy Chick wrote:I wonder if this is the same bunch that tried to start up Uni SA FC? if it's not the school.

I reckon this will probably have about as much legs as the UniSA attempt.

The_Informer wrote:Guess if i built a new oval next to Houghton and started a new club could i call it Hougton as well?

Only if you wanted to start a viking war.

The_Informer wrote:

Q. wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:I wonder if this is the same bunch that tried to start up Uni SA FC? if it's not the school.

I reckon this will probably have about as much legs as the UniSA attempt.

Does this mean Mawson Lakes will have to give back all the SPOS jumpers and that?

And the statue of Geoff.

gefugged MT

Haha, I do that to my wife all the time

It's a lottery anyway, many kids never meet expectations.

I've been commuting to Gawler for the last 7 1/2 years from Henley. Travel got the better of me, having a young family and working western suburbs. Pumped to be involved with a higher division club closer to home. Might have to change my username though!

Keep the username...it befits your personality.


























I jest, I jest :lol:

Here's what I reckon D7 should/could look like:

Angle Vale
Flinders University
Golden Grove C/D
Houghton Districts
Henley C/D
Mitchell Park
Modbury C/D
North Pines
Prince Alfred OC C/D
Wingfield*

*D7 Reserves have a bye during the week you play Wingfield

Flinders Park, SHOC & SMOSH relegated to D8

whufc wrote:

locky801 wrote:

Coach Bombay wrote:We lost

Again

Yeah but we did try hard which at the end of the day is what sport is all about

Wouldnt surprise me if this was Berry's debrief

So was Ablett, taken at pick #793