by Failed Creation » Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:52 am
by Booney » Mon Dec 01, 2014 8:59 am
by Failed Creation » Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:06 am
Booney wrote:Only going to get a bah humbug from me.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:30 am
by Footy Chick » Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:30 am
Failed Creation wrote:While we're talking about Christmas displays, does anyone else get pissed off at the lack of actual Christmas themed displays at the West End Brewery?
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by valleys07 » Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:51 am
by Spargo » Mon Dec 01, 2014 12:13 pm
by woodublieve12 » Mon Dec 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Spargo wrote:Posers that walk around supermarkets talking on their mobiles whilst having it on speaker.
You epitomise what a WANKER is.
by woodublieve12 » Mon Dec 01, 2014 12:26 pm
by Psyber » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:07 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Spargo wrote:Posers that walk around supermarkets talking on their mobiles whilst having it on speaker.
You epitomise what a WANKER is.
shame i can only like this comment once..
by bennymacca » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:11 pm
Psyber wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Spargo wrote:Posers that walk around supermarkets talking on their mobiles whilst having it on speaker.
You epitomise what a WANKER is.
shame i can only like this comment once..
I rarely ever answer my mobile without it being on speaker as I don't want to hold a source of radio frequency fields anywhere near my brain.
That being the case I don't usually answer it at all in places where having it on speaker would be intrusive on others.
Of course some would argue that it is rude to not answer...
by HH3 » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:13 pm
by bennymacca » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:21 pm
HH3 wrote:The amount of radio waves pulsing through the air all around us is probably more damaging than the ones coming from your phone.
Just look at how many places have Wifi, as well as Wimax and wireless internet.
by Psyber » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:23 pm
Psyber wrote:redandblack wrote:Do you remember the thread about how the prices were far too expensive?
The opponents of the NBN forgot to start a thread about how that was wrong and the prices are really good.
I'm one of those sceptics, and I'm waiting to see whether they stay good after they get enough take up to be able to claim the programme as a success. It wouldn't be the first industry to offer good starter prices in the early days to get a market share established, then adjust later.
by Footy Chick » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:24 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by bennymacca » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:28 pm
Footy Chick wrote:You get more radioactive material reheating your dinner in the microwave or listening to AM radio (true story)
That's what I used to tell the old grandma's that called in to cancel their mobile plans
Working for telstra for 5 years gives me plenty of ammo on people who think mobiles fry your brains.
by woodublieve12 » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:30 pm
bennymacca wrote:Footy Chick wrote:You get more radioactive material reheating your dinner in the microwave or listening to AM radio (true story)
That's what I used to tell the old grandma's that called in to cancel their mobile plans
Working for telstra for 5 years gives me plenty of ammo on people who think mobiles fry your brains.
not radioactive - non-ionising radiation
by HH3 » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:32 pm
Footy Chick wrote:You get more radioactive material reheating your dinner in the microwave or listening to AM radio (true story)
That's what I used to tell the old grandma's that called in to cancel their mobile plans
Working for telstra for 5 years gives me plenty of ammo on people who think mobiles fry your brains.
by Psyber » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:33 pm
bennymacca wrote:HH3 wrote:The amount of radio waves pulsing through the air all around us is probably more damaging than the ones coming from your phone.
Just look at how many places have Wifi, as well as Wimax and wireless internet.
it is all about the power of the radio waves, not how many different sources.
High power radio waves can act as a source of heating, (exactly what your microwave oven does), which can lead to health issues.
wavelength is also an issue - in the microwave band they are perfect to excite water molecules and hence why they are used in an oven. higher and lower frequencies have less of an effect.
the power also falls off as the square of the distance, so doubling the distance away from you makes the power go down by a factor of four.
by bennymacca » Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:36 pm
Psyber wrote:Psyber wrote:redandblack wrote:Do you remember the thread about how the prices were far too expensive?
The opponents of the NBN forgot to start a thread about how that was wrong and the prices are really good.
I'm one of those sceptics, and I'm waiting to see whether they stay good after they get enough take up to be able to claim the programme as a success. It wouldn't be the first industry to offer good starter prices in the early days to get a market share established, then adjust later.
My scepticism has been proved right for us light users - I rarely exceed 8GB per month.
When it was first mooted 10GB NBN plans at 25mbps were being offered at $39.95 per month - fairly commensurate with my existing ADSL2+ plan.*
The lowest NBN plan I can find now is a 12 mbps plan offering 30GB (uploads counted too) at $59.95, or $64.95 at 25mbps.
*Adding VoIP and a home phone brings my ADSL2+ plan to $59.95 per month - the same service with the NBN will now be a minimum of $89.85, and that is without allowing for the $10 a month free calls I get now.
So my $59.95 package jumps to something like $99.85 minimum for a doubling of my present speed...
Sure I can afford it but I resent attempts being made to con me and the general community...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |