Southern Football League

[Speccy02]

Any news on tonight's tribunal Old Man Emu?

Haven't Hird any thing.
I like the spot on your dog.

The SFL tribunal is a laughing stock, they are forming no consistency or taking common sense into the equation, JOKE! As for a young umpire being assigned to the MV / Noarlunga game equally as laughable, 2 traditional hard at it rivals things were always going to border over the edge, retaliators get stung AGAIN, get in the real world umps! Some good out there, weekends umpire's and others we've had this year, JOKE!

Are u serious Specccy????

Yes SB. One of your current players could not believe the actions of one of your players that went MJ first, for stupidity reasons mainly, both MV players are NOT snipers or instigators, their record as fair players speaks for themselves. Neither incident was dirty or malicious, either report both parties or play on, tribunal is to stamp out the dirty acts, this year it seems anyone getting reported automatically gets games regardless of the defense. Oh yeah, good one LEO, TASSONE = JOKE!

[shoe boy]

The SFL tribunal is a laughing stock, they are forming no consistency or taking common sense into the equation, JOKE! As for a young umpire being assigned to the MV / Noarlunga game equally as laughable, 2 traditional hard at it rivals things were always going to border over the edge, retaliators get stung AGAIN, get in the real world umps! Some good out there, weekends umpire's and others we've had this year, JOKE![/quote]

Are u serious Specccy????[/quote]

Yes SB. One of your current players could not believe the actions of one of your players that went MJ first, for stupidity reasons mainly, both MV players are NOT snipers or instigators, their record as fair players speaks for themselves. Neither incident was dirty or malicious, either report both parties or play on, tribunal is to stamp out the dirty acts, this year it seems anyone getting reported automatically gets games regardless of the defense. Oh yeah, good one LEO, TASSONE = JOKE![/quote]

Speccy what a rediculious post!!! You obviously didnt see the incident with MJ??? It is what is refered to as a dog act!!! and lucky he is only getting 2!

[Speccy02]

The SFL tribunal is a laughing stock, they are forming no consistency or taking common sense into the equation, JOKE! As for a young umpire being assigned to the MV / Noarlunga game equally as laughable, 2 traditional hard at it rivals things were always going to border over the edge, retaliators get stung AGAIN, get in the real world umps! Some good out there, weekends umpire's and others we've had this year, JOKE!

Are u serious Specccy????[/quote]

Yes SB. One of your current players could not believe the actions of one of your players that went MJ first, for stupidity reasons mainly, both MV players are NOT snipers or instigators, their record as fair players speaks for themselves. Neither incident was dirty or malicious, either report both parties or play on, tribunal is to stamp out the dirty acts, this year it seems anyone getting reported automatically gets games regardless of the defense. Oh yeah, good one LEO, TASSONE = JOKE![/quote]

Speccy what a rediculious post!!! You obviously didnt see the incident with MJ??? It is what is refered to as a dog act!!! and lucky he is only getting 2![/quote]

Obviously you didn't see the incident SB, ask around your own back yard who was there watching i know of 3 blokes from your club who have differing views to yours. Your honest thoughts on your runners behaviour would also be interesting to hear.

[shoe boy]

The SFL tribunal is a laughing stock, they are forming no consistency or taking common sense into the equation, JOKE! As for a young umpire being assigned to the MV / Noarlunga game equally as laughable, 2 traditional hard at it rivals things were always going to border over the edge, retaliators get stung AGAIN, get in the real world umps! Some good out there, weekends umpire's and others we've had this year, JOKE!

Are u serious Specccy????

Yes SB. One of your current players could not believe the actions of one of your players that went MJ first, for stupidity reasons mainly, both MV players are NOT snipers or instigators, their record as fair players speaks for themselves. Neither incident was dirty or malicious, either report both parties or play on, tribunal is to stamp out the dirty acts, this year it seems anyone getting reported automatically gets games regardless of the defense. Oh yeah, good one LEO, TASSONE = JOKE![/quote]

Speccy what a rediculious post!!! You obviously didnt see the incident with MJ??? It is what is refered to as a dog act!!! and lucky he is only getting 2![/quote]

Obviously you didn't see the incident SB, ask around your own back yard who was there watching i know of 3 blokes from your club who have differing views to yours. Your honest thoughts on your runners behaviour would also be interesting to hear.[/quote]

Speccy, Next time ur at the Shoe you can sit with me and I will show the dog act on dvd! clear as.
As for Jod's I didnt see anything untoward!! Agree Jodie loves a little banter no diff from his playing days but he knows where his role is. As for Jodie and the young lads you couldnt get a better mentor around the lads on training nights as he calls it as it is and puts them in their spot.

[ol man emu]

Noarlunga runner,With a name and mouth like that must be a good fighter or very fast runner.
Interesting he was stirring shit all day and when M/Vale retaliated the sook squealed like a pig.
Noarlunga are almost on the right track, get rid of him and play attacking football will be better off.

[ol man emu]

If he is your mentor good luck.

[Down the Hill]

Why talk in riddles boys. The other SFL Tribunal joke is not freely releasing information about reports and suspensions.

Speccy, you were happy to refer to the Noarlunga runner by name but not your own suspended players. I assume the B and the J are Beeching who got 1 match and Joralafsky who got 2. If this is correct just tell us, if not come clean.

If I've got it right, I admire both as footballers but to say they have records that speak for themselves and are never instigators is a bit of a stretch.

Both have received numerous yellow cards in games involving the Bombers over the years and some of these with tougher umpires should have gone to the tribunal.

[AFLflyer]

yeah few riddles been spoken.
someone want to actually say what happened.

[shoe boy]

yeah few riddles been spoken.
someone want to actually say what happened.

2 seperate incidents. Jaralozki? dog act 3 min b4 end of game.

Beeching in a ruck dule wasnt happy about the contest so took a few swings one clipped and thank god the others missed as the lad would of been out cold.

[AFLflyer]

yeah few riddles been spoken.
someone want to actually say what happened.

2 seperate incidents. Jaralozki? dog act 3 min b4 end of game.

Beeching in a ruck dule wasnt happy about the contest so took a few swings one clipped and thank god the others missed as the lad would of been out cold.

explain dog act? Hit from behind?

[Down the Hill]

So what is dirty and malicious Speccy. Stop treating your players as angels. You don't win 5 premierships in 6 years without blokes who play on the edge. If they cross that edge, which they sometimes do, they should be treated accordingly. Get over it. I'm sure Beech and Jora know they've got away with plenty over the years.

[Axle Rose]

yeah few riddles been spoken.
someone want to actually say what happened.

2 seperate incidents. Jaralozki? dog act 3 min b4 end of game.

Beeching in a ruck dule wasnt happy about the contest so took a few swings one clipped and thank god the others missed as the lad would of been out cold.

This "contest" left him with a broken nose. Agree with DTH, Beech will be the first to admit he's no angel, but ive never seen him retaliate in such fashion, so this "contest" was nothing of the sort. It was Shoes way of showing the game was slipping away. Happens all the time.

[Specky McGee]

Yes SB. One of your current players could not believe the actions of one of your players that went MJ first, for stupidity reasons mainly, both MV players are NOT snipers or instigators, their record as fair players speaks for themselves. Neither incident was dirty or malicious, either report both parties or play on, tribunal is to stamp out the dirty acts, this year it seems anyone getting reported automatically gets games regardless of the defense. Oh yeah, good one LEO, TASSONE = JOKE!

Not so sure I can agree with you here Speccy. Wasn't it Joralafsky who king hit some poor bloke from Westies whilst he was playing ressies for South a few years ago, rendering the Westies player completely unconscious? Hardly an example of a fair player with a clean record. Apologies if in fact it was the other Joralafsy involved in this incident.

[asert]

I agree as well with speccy mgee and dth I've never seen mj snipe but he does love to fight and I've seen him yellow carded numerous times. Beech I agree with you tho

[Speccy02]

Yes SB. One of your current players could not believe the actions of one of your players that went MJ first, for stupidity reasons mainly, both MV players are NOT snipers or instigators, their record as fair players speaks for themselves. Neither incident was dirty or malicious, either report both parties or play on, tribunal is to stamp out the dirty acts, this year it seems anyone getting reported automatically gets games regardless of the defense. Oh yeah, good one LEO, TASSONE = JOKE!

Not so sure I can agree with you here Speccy. Wasn't it Joralafsky who king hit some poor bloke from Westies whilst he was playing ressies for South a few years ago, rendering the Westies player completely unconscious? Hardly an example of a fair player with a clean record. Apologies if in fact it was the other Joralafsy involved in this incident.

Apology accepted!

[ol man emu]

Yes SB. One of your current players could not believe the actions of one of your players that went MJ first, for stupidity reasons mainly, both MV players are NOT snipers or instigators, their record as fair players speaks for themselves. Neither incident was dirty or malicious, either report both parties or play on, tribunal is to stamp out the dirty acts, this year it seems anyone getting reported automatically gets games regardless of the defense. Oh yeah, good one LEO, TASSONE = JOKE!

Not so sure I can agree with you here Speccy. Wasn't it Joralafsky who king hit some poor bloke from Westies whilst he was playing ressies for South a few years ago, rendering the Westies player completely unconscious? Hardly an example of a fair player with a clean record. Apologies if in fact it was the other Joralafsy involved in this incident.

Apology accepted.

[Speccy02]

So what is dirty and malicious Speccy. Stop treating your players as angels. You don't win 5 premierships in 6 years without blokes who play on the edge. If they cross that edge, which they sometimes do, they should be treated accordingly. Get over it. I'm sure Beech and Jora know they've got away with plenty over the years.

Dirty and malicious is self explanatory, cowardly acts etc. Both players like to punch on, however dont go out there specifically looking for it, if it comes their way then OK, they will go. Joras send offs generally involve hurling abuse at the men in white!

Yes DTH we have been able to win 5 of 6 GF's without the Draper model of "How to play dirty", interesting when you think about it! You will get to see the Halo over the football club in a couple weeks time in person, looking forward to the fashion your boys bring, hoping for a warmish day so we can see more of those skin tight denim jean short thingo's that seem to be part of your team match day uniform! Hair accessories of a number of players are also a highlight, I'm sure they can't wait to play at Morphett Vale.

[asert]

Mj was wrestling with one of my team mates a few years back, I went over to break it up and told him to let it go and he cracked me and got sent off. Saying he doesn't start it is a bit rich also buddy. Then less than 5 mins later Sam headbutted kingy and got sent of also. Which joras got sent off last year in the incident involving the all in and then players being sent off and mv having too many on the field at flaggy. Chances are he got a week purely for his record as I've seen some full on things get thrown out of the sfl shamble of a tribunal.

[Axle Rose]

Mj was wrestling with one of my team mates a few years back, I went over to break it up and told him to let it go and he cracked me and got sent off. Saying he doesn't start it is a bit rich also buddy. Then less than 5 mins later Sam headbutted kingy and got sent of also. Which joras got sent off last year in the incident involving the all in and then players being sent off and mv having too many on the field at flaggy. Chances are he got a week purely for his record as I've seen some full on things get thrown out of the sfl shamble of a tribunal.

Now your just stirring s**t asert. It was everton who got sent off in that game last year.

[Hills]

Chopper put together a few neat punches i heard. As for MJ, didnt mattho walk straight into the punches? Got dropped and went at him again? Thats just stupidity?

As for the suspensions. Regardless how it started or who landed punches 1-2 weeks isnt enough. If you hit someone in footy (and cause damage) it should be alot more than what they got. In the court of law negligence, battery and assault would have massive consequences.