Adelaide and Suburban Cricket Association 2010/11

[wycbloods]

Sampson definitely playing for ICC. Miller has blown the budget keeping him there though a deal a few others would like thats for sure.

Surely that stuff doesn't happen.
Sambo's a good player but MIller treats that clubs money as if it's his own.

agree with that sentiment smithy but he was desperate to keep Sambo.

[smithy]

Sampson definitely playing for ICC. Miller has blown the budget keeping him there though a deal a few others would like thats for sure.

Surely that stuff doesn't happen.
Sambo's a good player but MIller treats that clubs money as if it's his own.

agree with that sentiment smithy but he was desperate to keep Sambo.

Fair enough, maybe things have changed since I was there.
I don't think it's unfair to suggest that although he isn't the treasurer, too much power is wielded by the one person and has been the case since the formation of the club.

[Deep Heat]

COVE 2/228 defeated kennilworth 71

[Farva]

COVE 2/228 defeated kennilworth 71

who looked good for cove, how did michael thomas go and were cove that good or did kenelworth have a few out

[woodublieve12]

COVE 2/228 defeated kennilworth 71

who looked good for cove, how did michael thomas go and were cove that good or did kenelworth have a few out

kcc are section 2 side

[Farva]

COVE 2/228 defeated kennilworth 71

who looked good for cove, how did michael thomas go and were cove that good or did kenelworth have a few out

kcc are section 2 side

cheers mate

[Moe]

COVE 2/228 defeated kennilworth 71

who looked good for cove, how did michael thomas go and were cove that good or did kenelworth have a few out

kcc are section 2 side

cheers mate

That is still a 150 run flogging, in a T20 no less.
There is not that big a diff between section 1 & 2 surely.
As for M.Thomas, going by the score, he had a HUGE game.
Pity this week he is in for a shocker

[Amateur Footy]

Perhaps next year we should consider a Sect 1 T20 comp and a comp for the rest. Would prevent the need for these horrible preseason games.

[Amateur Footy]

Might as well get a bit of controversy started here seeing as though rd 1 is a week away!

What are your ladder predictions for this season? And standout players for the year?

1 Coromandel - standout: M. Longhurst
2 WYC - standout: J. Whenan
3 Keswick - standout: K. McKinley
4 Glenelg - standout: D. Rowe
5 Cove - standout: Mr. Cricketer
6 ICC Sharks - standout: D. Sampson
7 Ramblers - standout: M. Smith
8 Morphettville Pk - standout: R. Brokensha
9 Westminster OS - standout: S. McRae
10 Sheidow Pk - standout: B. Cameron
11 Plympton - standout: A. McCrea
12 South Rd - standout: S. Potts


... this should be good

do ya research before u post drivel like this. sampson has left icc and coro wont finish top i guarantee. they got hot at the right time of the year but dont have the bats to be consistent over a whole season, ramblers seventh? with the blokes weve picked up? clown

Caleb, please change your signature from "Ramblers" to "Ramblers members do not endorse my comments". Thanks.

[woodublieve12]

kcc are section 2 side[/quote]

cheers mate[/quote]
That is still a 150 run flogging, in a T20 no less.
There is not that big a diff between section 1 & 2 surely.
As for M.Thomas, going by the score, he had a HUGE game.
Pity this week he is in for a shocker [/quote]

theres not a large gap, but KCC aren't that good a section 2 side, so the gap is quite large between the 2 sides... wouldt take to much out of todays game...

[storyoftheyear]

Twenty20 - Sun Oct 3rd - Wirreanda HS


ICC 5/154
M. Todd 57*, Cheek 2/35

def

Coro 8/123
Ambler 27, C Birch 2/23

[CoverKing]

Twenty20 - Sun Oct 3rd - Wirreanda HS


ICC 5/154
M. Todd 57*, Cheek 2/35

def

Coro 8/123
Ambler 27, C Birch 2/23

does this mean Coro are still yet to win a t20 game???

Did Mick miller play??

[storyoftheyear]

haha it seems we're more suited to 75 over cricket in the last couple of years ck.

nah mick miller didnt play as he was interstate.

how did all the other t20 results go??

[JohnnyG]

who looked good for cove, how did michael thomas go and were cove that good or did kenelworth have a few out[/quote]

kcc are section 2 side[/quote]

cheers mate[/quote]
That is still a 150 run flogging, in a T20 no less.
There is not that big a diff between section 1 & 2 surely.
As for M.Thomas, going by the score, he had a HUGE game.
Pity this week he is in for a shocker [/quote]


Re the KCC side that "played" in that game, i would point out that only 3 blokes from our Section 2 played,
with 5 blokes from Section 5 and 3 blokes from Section 7, and our policy was to give all 11 a bowl (exc W/K).

Nevertheless, we were well and truly flogged and i dont know who was missing from Coves Section 1 side, hence it would be very difficult to put a guage on Coves standard.

If i had to give an opinion based purely on what i saw as w/k on Sunday, i would say that Cove will struggle to make the top 4-6 in Section 1.

Apart from that, they were a good bunch of blokes and very friendly.
I wish them well in our association.

[Jabber]

How much, would you suggest, would the have to have flogged you by if they wre, in your eyes, to be considered a threat in Section One?

who looked good for cove, how did michael thomas go and were cove that good or did kenelworth have a few out

kcc are section 2 side[/quote]

cheers mate[/quote]
That is still a 150 run flogging, in a T20 no less.
There is not that big a diff between section 1 & 2 surely.
As for M.Thomas, going by the score, he had a HUGE game.
Pity this week he is in for a shocker [/quote]


Re the KCC side that "played" in that game, i would point out that only 3 blokes from our Section 2 played,
with 5 blokes from Section 5 and 3 blokes from Section 7, and our policy was to give all 11 a bowl (exc W/K).

Nevertheless, we were well and truly flogged and i dont know who was missing from Coves Section 1 side, hence it would be very difficult to put a guage on Coves standard.

If i had to give an opinion based purely on what i saw as w/k on Sunday, i would say that Cove will struggle to make the top 4-6 in Section 1.

Apart from that, they were a good bunch of blokes and very friendly.
I wish them well in our association.[/quote]

[JohnnyG]

How much, would you suggest, would the have to have flogged you by if they wre, in your eyes, to be considered a threat in Section One?


quote: (JohnnyG) Re the KCC side that "played" in that game, i would point out that only 3 blokes from our Section 2 played,
with 5 blokes from Section 5 and 3 blokes from Section 7, and our policy was to give all 11 a bowl (exc W/K).

Nevertheless, we were well and truly flogged and i dont know who was missing from Coves Section 1 side, hence it would be very difficult to put a guage on Coves standard.

If i had to give an opinion based purely on what i saw as w/k on Sunday, i would say that Cove will struggle to make the top 4-6 in Section 1.

Apart from that, they were a good bunch of blokes and very friendly.
I wish them well in our association.

[/quote]



To be fair to Cove, i probably should not have judged them in any way based on that game.
I tried to assess their standard solely by looking at their bowling attack, their fielding, and the very few blokes that got to bat.
Obviously a much much clearer guage will come next round when they play again.

Due to the very limited observation and the way the game played out, one cant place too much credence on my evaluation of their standard - much to early indeed - i merely attempted to give a 1st impression based on what i saw and comparing it to players whom i have seen perform inour association previously.

[Jabber]

Spot on, i don't think you can judge too much from any T20 games, especially pre-season, that will hold you in much stead for 75/75 cricket.

Still a 150 run pantsing is a fairly convinsing way to 'get the cobwebs out' before the season propper!

How much, would you suggest, would the have to have flogged you by if they wre, in your eyes, to be considered a threat in Section One?


quote: (JohnnyG) Re the KCC side that "played" in that game, i would point out that only 3 blokes from our Section 2 played,
with 5 blokes from Section 5 and 3 blokes from Section 7, and our policy was to give all 11 a bowl (exc W/K).

Nevertheless, we were well and truly flogged and i dont know who was missing from Coves Section 1 side, hence it would be very difficult to put a guage on Coves standard.

If i had to give an opinion based purely on what i saw as w/k on Sunday, i would say that Cove will struggle to make the top 4-6 in Section 1.

Apart from that, they were a good bunch of blokes and very friendly.
I wish them well in our association.

To be fair to Cove, i probably should not have judged them in any way based on that game.
I tried to assess their standard solely by looking at their bowling attack, their fielding, and the very few blokes that got to bat.
Obviously a much much clearer guage will come next round when they play again.

Due to the very limited observation and the way the game played out, one cant place too much credence on my evaluation of their standard - much to early indeed - i merely attempted to give a 1st impression based on what i saw and comparing it to players whom i have seen perform inour association previously.[/quote]

[Tubby]

Tips,

Morphy's
Keswick
WYC
WOS
ANA
Ramblers

[Farva]

Spot on, i don't think you can judge too much from any T20 games, especially pre-season, that will hold you in much stead for 75/75 cricket.

Still a 150 run pantsing is a fairly convinsing way to 'get the cobwebs out' before the season propper!

How much, would you suggest, would the have to have flogged you by if they wre, in your eyes, to be considered a threat in Section One?


quote: (JohnnyG) Re the KCC side that "played" in that game, i would point out that only 3 blokes from our Section 2 played,
with 5 blokes from Section 5 and 3 blokes from Section 7, and our policy was to give all 11 a bowl (exc W/K).

Nevertheless, we were well and truly flogged and i dont know who was missing from Coves Section 1 side, hence it would be very difficult to put a guage on Coves standard.

If i had to give an opinion based purely on what i saw as w/k on Sunday, i would say that Cove will struggle to make the top 4-6 in Section 1.

Apart from that, they were a good bunch of blokes and very friendly.
I wish them well in our association.

To be fair to Cove, i probably should not have judged them in any way based on that game.
I tried to assess their standard solely by looking at their bowling attack, their fielding, and the very few blokes that got to bat.
Obviously a much much clearer guage will come next round when they play again.

Due to the very limited observation and the way the game played out, one cant place too much credence on my evaluation of their standard - much to early indeed - i merely attempted to give a 1st impression based on what i saw and comparing it to players whom i have seen perform inour association previously.

[/quote]


speaking to mates at cove they had kennilworth 4 for 10 and then bowled part timers with at least 5 of their premiership team from last season out, including there 2 best batsmen.

[smithy]

The only way Cove will not make the Top 4 is if they under estimate the standard of the A&SCA.