by norm11 » Mon May 02, 2011 3:47 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon May 02, 2011 5:56 pm
mighty hounds wrote:scud wrote:Pretty sure if you do just a little investigating you will find days is definatly not burgess. But he does make alot of sense with what he says! =)
I couldnt care less really if days is burgess but if ur going to come on here drunk you could at least put the he bit in first and not change it to he 10 mins after you put in I. Just a bit suss.
by jumbo » Mon May 02, 2011 7:01 pm
daysofourlives wrote:mighty hounds wrote:scud wrote:Pretty sure if you do just a little investigating you will find days is definatly not burgess. But he does make alot of sense with what he says! =)
I couldnt care less really if days is burgess but if ur going to come on here drunk you could at least put the he bit in first and not change it to he 10 mins after you put in I. Just a bit suss.
I bet if Burgess does venture out of the square this week you wont have the courage to get in his way without ducking your head MH. Not likely to happen though as he doesnt need to travel from the square to kick a bag. He's on track for a 80-100 goal season especially if the boys keep showing the sort of form they did saturday and a big scalp isnt far away for the bombers, as early as this week by my reckoning.
Was alot of devastated boys in the room after the game saturday, even some tears were shed, thats how much it means to the boys who have suffered for such a long time. They will come out even more determined this week and now know that not only can they compete with the other clubs they can beat them
by daysofourlives » Mon May 02, 2011 8:42 pm
jumbo wrote:daysofourlives wrote:mighty hounds wrote:scud wrote:Pretty sure if you do just a little investigating you will find days is definatly not burgess. But he does make alot of sense with what he says! =)
I couldnt care less really if days is burgess but if ur going to come on here drunk you could at least put the he bit in first and not change it to he 10 mins after you put in I. Just a bit suss.
I bet if Burgess does venture out of the square this week you wont have the courage to get in his way without ducking your head MH. Not likely to happen though as he doesnt need to travel from the square to kick a bag. He's on track for a 80-100 goal season especially if the boys keep showing the sort of form they did saturday and a big scalp isnt far away for the bombers, as early as this week by my reckoning.
Was alot of devastated boys in the room after the game saturday, even some tears were shed, thats how much it means to the boys who have suffered for such a long time. They will come out even more determined this week and now know that not only can they compete with the other clubs they can beat them
By 'big scalp' you mean any other team in the comp.
You want to start questioning player courage from behind a keyboard? I think I know who needs to grow a pair!
by jumbo » Mon May 02, 2011 9:13 pm
daysofourlives wrote:jumbo wrote:daysofourlives wrote:mighty hounds wrote:
I couldnt care less really if days is burgess but if ur going to come on here drunk you could at least put the he bit in first and not change it to he 10 mins after you put in I. Just a bit suss.
I bet if Burgess does venture out of the square this week you wont have the courage to get in his way without ducking your head MH. Not likely to happen though as he doesnt need to travel from the square to kick a bag. He's on track for a 80-100 goal season especially if the boys keep showing the sort of form they did saturday and a big scalp isnt far away for the bombers, as early as this week by my reckoning.
Was alot of devastated boys in the room after the game saturday, even some tears were shed, thats how much it means to the boys who have suffered for such a long time. They will come out even more determined this week and now know that not only can they compete with the other clubs they can beat them
By 'big scalp' you mean any other team in the comp.
You want to start questioning player courage from behind a keyboard? I think I know who needs to grow a pair!
Well all i can say is they dont call him Brett "Barry" Burgess for no reason, he wont start anything on the field but if you go him he will finish it!![]()
And yes i am questioning MH's courage but we will see on saturday wont we
by norm11 » Mon May 02, 2011 9:39 pm
by daysofourlives » Mon May 02, 2011 9:45 pm
norm11 wrote:Yea days why don't u?
by norm11 » Mon May 02, 2011 9:47 pm
daysofourlives wrote:norm11 wrote:Yea days why don't u?
Think you will find i will be playing as i do every week when my hammy allows me
by Dogwatcher » Mon May 02, 2011 10:33 pm
by scud » Tue May 03, 2011 1:26 am
daysofourlives wrote:norm11 wrote:Yea days why don't u?
Think you will find i will be playing as i do every week when my hammy allows me
by mighty hounds » Tue May 03, 2011 1:46 am
scud wrote:daysofourlives wrote:norm11 wrote:Yea days why don't u?
Think you will find i will be playing as i do every week when my hammy allows me
Now for all you long term posters on this site you should remember that brett burgess outed himself a couple years back when this site became full of people hiding behind there alias's and he come on here and pretty much told everyone to approach him if they had any real problems with him. So to rooster, mighty hound, ace of spades and a few more you guys should know that.
Brett would never say any of the stuff that 'days' is saying. I know who days is and he is very clever but as i posted the other days just have a look at his other posts in other leagues and you soon know its not brett.
I don't think brett is who everything from opposition sides think he is. I would suggest having a beer with him and then judging. Nothing against enjoying a goal and from where i sit thats all he does to annoy.
by Ace of Spades » Tue May 03, 2011 2:31 am
by Ace of Spades » Tue May 03, 2011 2:46 am
UNDERthePACK wrote:Virginia 1-39: Virginia coming off a couple weeks break may be a little sluggish but will still be too strong for the Tigers.
Hummocks 1-39: Hamley to contain Ace of Spades which will go a long way in the end result. Would like to see the brother in laws play on each other but unfortunately that would mean that Ace would need to be playing at 12.30pm. Hummocks midfield and forward line will be too strong for Hamley.
Mallala 1-39: Game of the round. These two side produce close game in the past few years and I don't think this will be any different. I was very close to selecting two Wells but I am down the bottom of the tips ladder so I will stay with the favourite.
by jumbo » Tue May 03, 2011 8:57 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Can any of the old timers on here tell me about Jeff Norton and his time at Two Wells?
by jumbo » Tue May 03, 2011 9:01 am
scud wrote:daysofourlives wrote:norm11 wrote:Yea days why don't u?
Think you will find i will be playing as i do every week when my hammy allows me
Now for all you long term posters on this site you should remember that brett burgess outed himself a couple years back when this site became full of people hiding behind there alias's and he come on here and pretty much told everyone to approach him if they had any real problems with him. So to rooster, mighty hound, ace of spades and a few more you guys should know that.
Brett would never say any of the stuff that 'days' is saying. I know who days is and he is very clever but as i posted the other days just have a look at his other posts in other leagues and you soon know its not brett.
I don't think brett is who everything from opposition sides think he is. I would suggest having a beer with him and then judging. Nothing against enjoying a goal and from where i sit thats all he does to annoy.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue May 03, 2011 9:25 am
norm11 wrote:Does anyone else think the quality of the umpire should be better in the 17s than the b grade?
by norm11 » Tue May 03, 2011 10:26 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:norm11 wrote:Does anyone else think the quality of the umpire should be better in the 17s than the b grade?
What do you mean by that norm?
by Jab » Tue May 03, 2011 11:07 am
by Q. » Tue May 03, 2011 11:12 am
Jab wrote:Days, you are an absolute wanker, you are trying to have people on this forum think that you are Brett Burgess but I know and a lot of others know who you really are, you should get a life and stop stirring in a forum that you have no real interest in, but to sit behind your alias and cause ****. I have never liked you and will reveal your identity in a flash if you dont cut it out, you are an idiot
by norm11 » Tue May 03, 2011 11:33 am
Seagull wrote:norm11 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:norm11 wrote:Does anyone else think the quality of the umpire should be better in the 17s than the b grade?
What do you mean by that norm?
I coach the under17s at Hamley. I thought the quality of umpire we had on Saturday wasn't good enough. Everyone could see they were looking after the opposition, didn't help we still won by 10 goal. But it's not teaching anyone anything. Those kids will grow thinking when I get tackled by someone bigger I will get the free.
I just think that the 17s is prob the second highest standard of footy on a saturday and that it should have good quality umpires[/quote]
You are correct on the umpiring of U/17's, they should have quality umpiring, but where do you find them????
Football
Other Footy Leagues
Country Footy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

