by BenchedEagle » Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:02 pm
by mick » Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:08 pm
by BenchedEagle » Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:14 pm
by TroyGFC » Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:15 pm
by Sojourner » Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:49 pm
lizbeff eaglez wrote:Labor will Attack:
IR LAWS - Less job security, less rights
IRAQ - We committed to a war that was wrong and we lost.
David Hicks - We let him rot for 5 years without charge!
AWB -
Telstra -
Interest rate rises since last election
Qantas takeover
Peter Costello will be PM straight after election
Labor will have to defend?
Interest rates levels from decades ago????
Soft on Terrorism?????
What else guys, fill me in please
Please tell me what the Liberals can use to get the everyday people to stay with them for one more election????
Id call this a no-contest this time around
by Pseudo » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:02 pm
by BenchedEagle » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:46 pm
Poor effort at a comeback here but good on u for tryingSojourner wrote:lizbeff eaglez wrote:Labor will Attack:
IR LAWS - Less job security, less rights
IRAQ - We committed to a war that was wrong and we lost.
David Hicks - We let him rot for 5 years without charge!
AWB -
Telstra -
Interest rate rises since last election
Qantas takeover
Peter Costello will be PM straight after election
Labor will have to defend?
Interest rates levels from decades ago????
Soft on Terrorism?????
What else guys, fill me in please
Please tell me what the Liberals can use to get the everyday people to stay with them for one more election????
Id call this a no-contest this time around
IR Laws, Agree there, Labor has an opportunity to make some genuine gains on that issue.
Iraq, Wont work, - people feel uneasy about putting down our troops while serving overseas, the initial response to Vietnam veterens is a lesson learnt in the community. Not about the troops, its about the government putting them there!
David Hicks, Will cost Labor votes when he is found guilty of assisting Al-Queda, many people remember Sep 11 and the Bali Bombings all to well, Hicks as a part of that group will be seen as responsable, if Labor campaign for him, they will lose by more next time as has been the case the past three times. Talkin absolute crap here mate, Hicks responsible for Bali 9/11, get off the grass, not even the average Joe Bloggs will beleive that fairytale.
AWB, Will be a non issue, if Labor campaign on it, they will be seen to be attacking rural communities and will lose undecided voters in rural areas. Both parties have 30% rusted on voters and 10% to the others, it is the 30% swinging voters that decide elections.
Telstra, a good opportunity to attack the government, Labor stand a good chance of picking up National party voters after Barnaby Joyce sold them out. Correct
Interest Rates, they would be unlikely to attack on this point, as it will be free advertising for the Liberal party who will do all they can to suggest that Interest Rates will rise under an incomming Labor Government, watch for mass advertising in mortgate belt areas like Makin and Kingston that are marginal on this issue and contain many on mortgages. As i said Liberal will not be game to fight this election on rates consistant rises since the last election and Howard today in a nervous way saying"Of course i cant guarantee there wont be more rate rises to come." Cant argue that dead horse anymore.
Quantas Takeover, a non event, Liberal will be able to effectivley distance themselves from it by stating conditions of job garantees as a pre-requisite for running the company. They cant and havent guaranteed job security
Peter Costello, Liberal will goad Labor into suggesting or implying that Howard is too old and will trip Labor up into pissing off a number of elderly voters and a group in the boomer generation as a result, an effective trick that paid dividends last time. Everyone knows Howard will retire after this election win or lose. the Liberal party arent stupid, they know Costello could NEVER win an election.
What Labor will have to defend?
Any disunity on Uranium Mining as it will be implied that they are anti job creation in favor of Green preferences. Cost them two seats in Tasmania last time after they sold out CFMEU workers jobs for Green preferences that amounted to nothing. That will be ironed out come policy time.
The Suggestion that Labor are extreme left wing and are ruled by the left faction. Crap, average Ozzies wouldnt know what a faction is
Advertising showing the details of the five major factions in the Labor Party. Liberal party doesnt have factions???
Footage advertising what Gillard thought of Rudd, before they got into bed together, and it is not very complimentary. Will be used heavilly to suggest factionalism and a government that will be wound up in factional fighting. Costello Vs Howard last year???
Interest Rates.
Rudd being painted as a smart arse and up himself, painted as being decietfull in conduct with reference to Brian Burke, done to sow doubt into the swinging voters mind that is he is any better than Howard. Rudd is an intelligent down to earth guy, look at Howards conduct b4 being elected. A non issue here. Burke issue id=s forgotton. A certain minister made sure of that.
The suggestion that Labor have no policies. Seeing as policys for the campaign are a while away. Clutching a straw here
Campaining on low unemployment figures with heavy advertising of the statistic that shows that there are more people in full time work per capita than ever before. Other statistics about where the economy is now as opposed to where it was with Keating. Meh, elections arent won on employmet levels. Keating over a decade ago, big chunk of the election were kids when Keating was in power
An attack on State Labor governments for not abolishing state taxes in return for GST revenue.
There is likely more than these, yet a good start!
by our_longreach » Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:30 am
by zipzap » Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:52 am
by Sheik Yerbouti » Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:31 am
lizbeff eaglez wrote:Rudd is an down to earth guy
by BenchedEagle » Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:27 pm
Whats not to like about the guys personality compared Howards?Sheik Yerbouti wrote:lizbeff eaglez wrote:Rudd is an down to earth guy
That's it, you got me.
by scoob » Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:44 pm
lizbeff eaglez wrote:Whats not to like about the guys personality compared Howards?Sheik Yerbouti wrote:lizbeff eaglez wrote:Rudd is an down to earth guy
That's it, you got me.
Intresting fact today my workmates brother is a cameraman for 9 and does a lot of the today show. And in the last 2 interviews on today. Howard requested that he be above the camera in shot. So it gives the appearence of him as a higher figure. Watch out for it!
by Wedgie » Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:25 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by smac » Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:14 pm
That's my opinion too Wedgie. The scaremongering by both Unions and the ALP is just another example of political pointscoring (something all politicians are guilty of). ALP will have to earn my vote another way.Wedgie wrote:Im still waiting on someone to let me know if they're aware of 1 person who has been disadvantaged with the new IR Rules.
Im aware of at least half a dozen businesses that can continue to operate because of them but I haven't come across one poor soul who'd been given the arse for wearing the wrong colour tie yet.
Storm in a tea cup.
by Sheik Yerbouti » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:48 pm
Wedgie wrote:Im still waiting on someone to let me know if they're aware of 1 person who has been disadvantaged with the new IR Rules.
Im aware of at least half a dozen businesses that can continue to operate because of them but I haven't come across one poor soul who'd been given the arse for wearing the wrong colour tie yet.
Storm in a tea cup.
by Punk Rooster » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:18 pm
not the same little cheeky sod who signed with Broadview?Sheik Yerbouti wrote:Wedgie wrote:Im still waiting on someone to let me know if they're aware of 1 person who has been disadvantaged with the new IR Rules.
Im aware of at least half a dozen businesses that can continue to operate because of them but I haven't come across one poor soul who'd been given the arse for wearing the wrong colour tie yet.
Storm in a tea cup.
They disadvantaged me, the two youngest employees not long out of school at the time approached me & asked for a 15% rise under the Industrial Relations act, knowing we were snowed under & the pain in the arse it is to train new young fellas.
Cheeky little sods had me by the gonads & got it.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Sheik Yerbouti » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:31 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:not the same little cheeky sod who signed with Broadview?Sheik Yerbouti wrote:Wedgie wrote:Im still waiting on someone to let me know if they're aware of 1 person who has been disadvantaged with the new IR Rules.
Im aware of at least half a dozen businesses that can continue to operate because of them but I haven't come across one poor soul who'd been given the arse for wearing the wrong colour tie yet.
Storm in a tea cup.
They disadvantaged me, the two youngest employees not long out of school at the time approached me & asked for a 15% rise under the Industrial Relations act, knowing we were snowed under & the pain in the arse it is to train new young fellas.
Cheeky little sods had me by the gonads & got it.
by noone » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:19 am
Sojourner wrote:[
What Labor will have to defend?
The Suggestion that Labor are extreme left wing and are ruled by the left faction.
Advertising showing the details of the five major factions in the Labor Party.
by Psyber » Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:25 pm
by PhilG » Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:55 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |