EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
-
Ken Whelan Fan
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:52 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Ramblers
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
Never went very far at all Carmelo,didnt even get to the Tribunal.
The guy concerned is a friend of mine and a neighbour, storm in a tea cup.
Not in the same league as this.
The guy concerned is a friend of mine and a neighbour, storm in a tea cup.
Not in the same league as this.
-
wlm
- Mini-League
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:23 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
I saw the incident. I thought the "dog act" was carried out by the player in his behaviour towards the umpire. Is this behavior being condoned by partisan views after stepping down from the "moral high ground" of three weeks ago.?
-
Ken Whelan Fan
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:52 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Ramblers
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
What was the Dog Act because the umpire concerned doesnt know.
- Media Park
- Coach
- Posts: 13864
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:58 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Boston
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
Cracking a stubby, getting some popcorn, and getting ready for safooty's next great tennis match. 
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
- bluestheboy
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:37 pm
- Team: Eagles
- Team: Carlton
- Team: Wayback
- Location: Port Lincoln
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
Obviously concerned them enough to read the riot act to the player after the game. I believe the message was that he was treading a fine line and that he needed lift his game. This came from the 4th person in the umpires room at the time.Ken Whelan Fan wrote:What was the Dog Act because the umpire concerned doesnt know.
As a Wayback LM (or WLM as we like to call them) I don't necessarily agree with the action we have taken, but neither did I agree with the actions of the player concerned.
As for calling it a dog act...KWF you are better than that!
- Media Park
- Coach
- Posts: 13864
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:58 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Boston
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
Giggity giggity
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
-
ironknob
- Rookie
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:42 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Team: Tasman
- Location: 2011 mail medal count
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
bluestheboy wrote:Obviously concerned them enough to read the riot act to the player after the game. I believe the message was that he was treading a fine line and that he needed lift his game. This came from the 4th person in the umpires room at the time.Ken Whelan Fan wrote:What was the Dog Act because the umpire concerned doesnt know.
As a Wayback LM (or WLM as we like to call them) I don't necessarily agree with the action we have taken, but neither did I agree with the actions of the player concerned.
As for calling it a dog act...KWF you are better than that!
I wasn't happy with the incident either , however i would be disgusted if my club behaved like the WFC today. We prefer to do our talkiing on the field. This is a weak action from a weak club.
This will not be forgotten.
- steakn
- Under 18s
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:02 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
ironknob wrote:bluestheboy wrote:Obviously concerned them enough to read the riot act to the player after the game. I believe the message was that he was treading a fine line and that he needed lift his game. This came from the 4th person in the umpires room at the time.Ken Whelan Fan wrote:What was the Dog Act because the umpire concerned doesnt know.
As a Wayback LM (or WLM as we like to call them) I don't necessarily agree with the action we have taken, but neither did I agree with the actions of the player concerned.
As for calling it a dog act...KWF you are better than that!
I wasn't happy with the incident either , however i would be disgusted if my club behaved like the WFC today. We prefer to do our talkiing on the field. This is a weak action from a weak club.
This will not be forgotten.
Let's see it then, all the public can see is Tasman supporters whinging and getting narky on safooty!
I don't even know what this is all about anyway???
- Media Park
- Coach
- Posts: 13864
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:58 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: Geelong
- Team: Boston
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
A Tasman footballer allegedly elbowed Keatley.
A Tasman playing/coach allegedly forcefully removed a yellow card from an umpires hand.
A Wayback official wrote an official complaint.
A Tasman playing/coach allegedly forcefully removed a yellow card from an umpires hand.
A Wayback official wrote an official complaint.
Direct quote:
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
- leonidis
- Under 16s
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:53 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
Media Park wrote:A Tasman footballer allegedly elbowed Keatley.
A Tasman playing/coach allegedly forcefully removed a yellow card from an umpires hand.
A Wayback official wrote an official complaint.
PLFL get off your ass and sort this mess out!!
PAMFC reserves '09 premiers
- coyote ugly
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:36 am
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Location: PLFL league rooms
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
Ken Whelan Fan wrote:possibly the lowest dog act by any club in the history of the PLFL
No ken,
your club won that award hands down when we all agreed at an official meeting that we (PLFL and all 6 clubs) would wait on the ravendale proposal. I have it written in the minutes. One club went behind everyones back didnt they? That wont be forgotten
waybacks have every right to lodge a complaint that brings the game into disrepute and now it will be thoroughly investigated tomorrow.
[quote="westcoastpanther"
Does PL footy really need the Tigers, after last years efforts I'd say no. It's a bye anyway, might as well just call the day off and go fishing!![/quote]
Does PL footy really need the Tigers, after last years efforts I'd say no. It's a bye anyway, might as well just call the day off and go fishing!![/quote]
-
dukes of hazard
- Mini-League
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:07 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
Can every body believe how lucky tasmans are they have players, supporters and parents that voulenteer around the club, some that coach, some that umpire on Saturdays and some that even come out to support the juniors!!! That sounds like ever other sporting club is the country!!!! Its not a culture its how clubs work!!!!
- coyote ugly
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:36 am
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Location: PLFL league rooms
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
dukes of hazard wrote:Can every body believe how lucky tasmans are they have players, supporters and parents that voulenteer around the club, some that coach, some that umpire on Saturdays and some that even come out to support the juniors!!! That sounds like ever other sporting club is the country!!!! Its not a culture its how clubs work!!!!
Tasmans have culture, they are a foundation club and have won 7 or 8 premierships
[quote="westcoastpanther"
Does PL footy really need the Tigers, after last years efforts I'd say no. It's a bye anyway, might as well just call the day off and go fishing!![/quote]
Does PL footy really need the Tigers, after last years efforts I'd say no. It's a bye anyway, might as well just call the day off and go fishing!![/quote]
- bluestheboy
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:37 pm
- Team: Eagles
- Team: Carlton
- Team: Wayback
- Location: Port Lincoln
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
ironknob wrote:bluestheboy wrote:Obviously concerned them enough to read the riot act to the player after the game. I believe the message was that he was treading a fine line and that he needed lift his game. This came from the 4th person in the umpires room at the time.Ken Whelan Fan wrote:What was the Dog Act because the umpire concerned doesnt know.
As a Wayback LM (or WLM as we like to call them) I don't necessarily agree with the action we have taken, but neither did I agree with the actions of the player concerned.
As for calling it a dog act...KWF you are better than that!
I wasn't happy with the incident either , however i would be disgusted if my club behaved like the WFC today. We prefer to do our talkiing on the field. This is a weak action from a weak club.
This will not be forgotten.
Now let's get this right... Not happy when a player gets sent of for striking and then proceeds to disrespect the official by knocking the card from his hand but disgusted that a club should complain about it...mmmmm interesting
As for your last statement, you are either new to the club or have a short memory
- steakn
- Under 18s
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:02 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
Media Park wrote:A Tasman footballer allegedly elbowed Keatley.
A Tasman playing/coach allegedly forcefully removed a yellow card from an umpires hand.
A Wayback official wrote an official complaint.
Ta.
Sounds pretty straight forward....red card the player. Who was it?
-
captian cook
- Member
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:37 am
- Team: Carlton
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
is it true coyote ugly that waybacks had a players name missing from there u/17 team sheet which could result in them losing second spot?
-
Ken Whelan Fan
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:52 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Ramblers
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
-
Justquietly
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 11:11 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Carlton
- Team: Mt Lofty
- Location: The A Team van
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 5 times
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
Media Park wrote:A Tasman footballer allegedly elbowed Keatley.
A Tasman playing/coach allegedly forcefully removed a yellow card from an umpires hand.
A Wayback official wrote an official complaint.
KWF - WTF?! If the above is how it panned out, what the hell is all your arm flapping about? How is this a dog act?
Chuck Norris makes onions cry
-
Ken Whelan Fan
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:52 pm
- Team: Sturt
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Ramblers
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
BTB you forgot the word "allegedly"
If Semmler had made deliberate contact with an umpire as your club has reported him for
then dont you think the umpire would have red carded him and reported him.
As for a dog act BTB I honestly thought that you guys were better than that.
You won the game fair and square.
now it seems you want to make sure that our participation in the final series is curtailed
by means other than on the field fighting for the pill.
Your Club has a proud and long history of Success on and off the field......
not anymore it seems.
If Semmler had made deliberate contact with an umpire as your club has reported him for
then dont you think the umpire would have red carded him and reported him.
As for a dog act BTB I honestly thought that you guys were better than that.
You won the game fair and square.
now it seems you want to make sure that our participation in the final series is curtailed
by means other than on the field fighting for the pill.
Your Club has a proud and long history of Success on and off the field......
not anymore it seems.
- coyote ugly
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:36 am
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Location: PLFL league rooms
Re: EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL
Ken Whelan Fan wrote:BTB you forgot the word "allegedly"
If Semmler had made deliberate contact with an umpire as your club has reported him for
then dont you think the umpire would have red carded him and reported him.
As for a dog act BTB I honestly thought that you guys were better than that.
You won the game fair and square.
now it seems you want to make sure that our participation in the final series is curtailed
by means other than on the field fighting for the pill.
Your Club has a proud and long history of Success on and off the field......
not anymore it seems.
Lets get one thing straight here.
Any club has the right to bring an incident 'on the field or off it' to our attention. And we have the right to investigate it. End of story.
If we find that the situation has been dealt with we will leave it at that (this will probably be the case here) but if we find this individual has brought the ganme into disrepute then he will face the tribunal tomorrow night.
Question: If this was a lesser player being investigated kwf one wonders if there would still be all this arm flapping coming from your club?
[quote="westcoastpanther"
Does PL footy really need the Tigers, after last years efforts I'd say no. It's a bye anyway, might as well just call the day off and go fishing!![/quote]
Does PL footy really need the Tigers, after last years efforts I'd say no. It's a bye anyway, might as well just call the day off and go fishing!![/quote]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests
