OnSong wrote:RooShootOhh wrote:OnSong wrote:Next year's points allocation should be as follows:
Balaklava: 9
Hamley Bridge: 15
HWE: 12
Mallala: 8
Two Wells: 10
United: 14
Virginia: 8
What did they each have this yr OnSong??
Balaklava: 9
Hamley Bridge: 15
HWE: 10
Mallala: 8
Two Wells: 12
United: 12
Virginia: 9
Doesnt seem right to me, basically the points system is telling me Balak, 1st and 2nd (regular season only) in the last 2 years are only 2 country players better than Hamley who have only won 6 games over those 2 yrs??? Must be some country footballers!
I can probably live with the allocation of the bottom 3 placed sides, but i think there is a fair bit of space there for the top 4 to move. Lets not kid ourselves there was 8 games between 4th and 5th this year. I even think the roosters have beem looked after even considering their 3 wins last year.
Given the rating put on footballers coming into the league, that should be reflected in the allocation of points...
The BLG are an ok example, Tanunda have only 3 points, and so they should with their record. Virginia would have won similar amounts of regular season games (and I nelieve that is what it is taken from) over the last 3 years, their inability to win the big dance on the day should not be rewarded with points.