SAAFL Division 1 2013

[Fricky]

Sorry Suri, but I'm a bit confused with the point you are trying to make here.....

Was just pointing out that there are clubs that do pay all their a graders match day payments.

BUT, in re-reading your post i realise that i have mis-read it. I thought you were asking what club would pay all their a graders game day payments as well as a sign on fee, when you were actually asking who would give all of their players a $3000 sign on fee. My bad

[bird of prey]

Okey dokey

[marbles]

which clubs give sign on payments??? i'll sign i'll sign gimme contract

[kickinit]

which clubs give sign on payments??? i'll sign i'll sign gimme contract

a fair few could be wrong but i think kilburn gave a few sign on bonuses

[Fricky]

which clubs give sign on payments??? i'll sign i'll sign gimme contract

I hear Callington offer some pretty good sign on payments. Give them a call

[ruffntuff]

clubs would be lucky to pay more than 3 players a sign on and u would have to be a bloody good player to get it but I couldn't imagine it would be around the 3k mark

[The Big Shrek]

Walkies player budget is $130k this year.

[footys the winner]

Walkies player budget is $130k this year.

They are in div 2 mate. This is the div 1 forum.

[The Big Shrek]

So are PAOC and Kilburn who other posters mentioned you muppet.

[Footy Chick]

back on div 1 talk please people.

and we don't care how much you think club are playing - there's about a 100% chance you're wrong anyway and then you all look like dills

[marbles]

When I came up the ranks I was told its a league regulation that all div 1 clubs must pay every a-grade participant a minimum amount after each game. And in in div 2 that minimum amount is a little less.

So why div 2 clubs in some respect resent going up the a div because player expenses are higher

Is it regulation?

[Footy Chick]

of course it isn't a regulation - given that we're supposed to be an AMATEUR league

[Yardy Lard]

It is not a regulation Marbles. No club has to pay anything to any player and not because it is the amateur league either. That notion or thought is way off. There is no specific amount a player must receive. Just because it is the amateur league, does not mean that players cant be paid any longer, and has been the case for many, many years.

The amateur league or the SAAFL was the name given for when the league was purely amateur, and players had to be "Whitewashed" to play, after receiving money as a "professional or paid player".

It any player had been paid before coming into the SAAFL the "Whitewash" rule applied. This was prevalent in the 60's and 70's but died out in the 80's. Many players were not "Whitewashed" during this time

Everyone knew players were getting paid from the late 70's and through the 80's. Often big amounts, but clubs denied paying it. This went on throughout A1 and was rampant, with some of the bigger clubs at the time being notorious.

By the 90's there were rules in place, so that players could get payed and the "Whitewash" rule was finished with. Instead of just sticking their heads in the sand the SAAFL acknowledged that players were bing payed. Rules were made back then, to make it legal, and this has been the case for many, many years now. The exact date or year, I don't remember.

In short - no player has to be payed anything however the logic that it is because is the amateur league is not the reason, as clubs can pay players.

[Cohiba]

When I came up the ranks I was told its a league regulation that all div 1 clubs must pay every a-grade participant a minimum amount after each game. And in in div 2 that minimum amount is a little less.

So why div 2 clubs in some respect resent going up the a div because player expenses are higher

Is it regulation?

Just out of curiosity......who told you it's a league regulation????.........Me thinks somebody went fishing.....

[marbles]

When I came up the ranks I was told its a league regulation that all div 1 clubs must pay every a-grade participant a minimum amount after each game. And in in div 2 that minimum amount is a little less.

So why div 2 clubs in some respect resent going up the a div because player expenses are higher

Is it regulation?

Just out of curiosity......who told you it's a league regulation????.........Me thinks somebody went fishing.....

Phht I dunno was decades ago

but there is a justified reason to why agrades must be paid, just cant think of it currently

why would it be compulsary to SANFL to pay all players, what is the reasoning here??

[Footy Chick]

It is not a regulation Marbles. No club has to pay anything to any player and not because it is the amateur league either. That notion or thought is way off. There is no specific amount a player must receive. Just because it is the amateur league, does not mean that players cant be paid any longer, and has been the case for many, many years.

The amateur league or the SAAFL was the name given for when the league was purely amateur, and players had to be "Whitewashed" to play, after receiving money as a "professional or paid player".

It any player had been paid before coming into the SAAFL the "Whitewash" rule applied. This was prevalent in the 60's and 70's but died out in the 80's. Many players were not "Whitewashed" during this time

Everyone knew players were getting paid from the late 70's and through the 80's. Often big amounts, but clubs denied paying it. This went on throughout A1 and was rampant, with some of the bigger clubs at the time being notorious.

By the 90's there were rules in place, so that players could get payed and the "Whitewash" rule was finished with. Instead of just sticking their heads in the sand the SAAFL acknowledged that players were bing payed. Rules were made back then, to make it legal, and this has been the case for many, many years now. The exact date or year, I don't remember.

In short - no player has to be payed anything however the logic that it is because is the amateur league is not the reason, as clubs can pay players.

Thanks for the thesis there Yardy but all he asked was if players HAD to be paid SOMETHING - and I said no

[Slots It Through]

I think back in 94 or 95 they brought in the Premier league which allowed clubs to pay players.

[CHUMAN]

more good news out of bagster road, former SN bad boy Chris Motley has returned to the club for 2013. i think thats puts the player budget up to $250,000 for SN this year. Get on the SN train now before its too late.

[CHUMAN]

which clubs give sign on payments??? i'll sign i'll sign gimme contract

a fair few could be wrong but i think kilburn gave a few sign on bonuses

All of kilburns sign on fees were cut this year besides deserved new recruits. nice try though mate, always next time.

[kickinit]

which clubs give sign on payments??? i'll sign i'll sign gimme contract

a fair few could be wrong but i think kilburn gave a few sign on bonuses

All of kilburns sign on fees were cut this year besides deserved new recruits. nice try though mate, always next time.

but didn't you have sign on fee's last year?