AFL Reserves Discussion...

[The Sleeping Giant]

OK what will your club most likely do ? Copy, paste and edit this .....

Centrals : No
Glenelg
North : No
Norwood : No
South
Sturt
West

You positive Norwood would vote no under any circumstance?

[CENTURION]

Centrals : No
Glenelg no
North : No
Norwood : No
South no
Sturt maybe, depending on the amount of the bribe, probably a yes already
West maybe, depending on the amount of the bribe
Eagles yes.

[The Sleeping Giant]

Centrals : No
Glenelg no
North : No
Norwood : No
South no
Sturt maybe, depending on the amount of the bribe, probably a yes already
West maybe, depending on the amount of the bribe
Eagles yes.

You are speculating.

[CENTURION]

of course.

[The Sleeping Giant]

Centrals : Have been told no by a few people.
Glenelg : Not sure
North : No
Norwood : Not sure
South : Not sure
Sturt : Not sure, but have heard no.
West : Not sure
Eagles : Not sure

[PhilH]

Where the hell did you get Eagles yes from.

[CENTURION]

Godden

[SDK]

Big Phil would be very interested in your opinion .... and Wedgie.

[Aerie]

Godden

Rubbish. All he said was all options need to be laid on the table and make a decision from there. At the moment there is no information coming from anyone.

You have the Crows saying they want a 2nds side but not giving any info on where they get their top up players from.
You have the banner holders saying no, no matter what, even if it means the end of the Magpies and perhaps another couple of clubs because they can't be financial.
You have the SANFL saying it is last on a number of issues, yet clearly an answer needs to be coming soon.
You have the AFL wanting reserves side in the SANFL but not giving any thought on how that effects our competition.

We need all the information with all scenarios, and then we can say no!

[The Sleeping Giant]

Godden

You have the AFL wanting reserves side in the SANFL but not giving any thought on how that effects our competition.

Have the AFL said that? Not sure they would be too concerned actually.

[SDK]

Good post Aerie.
Assuming it will take a 2/3 majority to carry the vote the yes vote needs 6 of 8. Even a clear majority needs 5 of 8.
About time the cards were placed on the table.

[on the rails]

Sturt are a NO - the media is speculating because Halbert got up at their AGM unannounced and spoke on who's behalf??? Certainly not their Board or Members!

[Wedgie]

Big Phil would be very interested in your opinion .... and Wedgie.

Huh?

[klaan]

I am a NO. But would love PhilH or Big Phil to actually detail some of the issues from both viewpoints so my NO could be a more informed one.

[PhilH]

Foot-e Times covered it a fair bit in depth last year and ran a readers survey this season.

Maybe we should have a readers questions issue, readers ask questions and the panel does some research work to try & answer them.

[RB]

Wouldn't it be great to see an 8-0 NO vote.

[The Sleeping Giant]

Wouldn't it be great to see an 8-0 NO vote.

9-0. Country football has a vote don't they.

[RB]

Yes. 9-0 would be better. Anyone have any idea on how Rob Kerin would vote?

[Wedgie]

Yes. 9-0 would be better. Anyone have any idea on how Rob Kerin would vote?

Liberal

[Mark_Beswick]

West was a resounding no at the vote - I asked officials today