by The Sorce » Wed Nov 20, 2013 4:44 pm
by Armytank » Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:03 pm
by cracka » Wed Nov 20, 2013 6:33 pm
Armytank wrote:That is just it isn't it
I can't believe some people are defending the board on this
by Armytank » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:02 am
cracka wrote:Armytank wrote:That is just it isn't it
I can't believe some people are defending the board on this
Not defending them on the Echunga backflip.
A lot of posters blamed the Board for listening to Lofty's proposal which is wrong, the board have a duty to listen to any proposal, so will defend them for that.
Will also defend them for having 2 SGM's because it was actually Uraidla that adjourned the 1st one, NOT the board.
Lofty apparently put up 3 different proposals & the board reduced that to just the one.
Will also defend clubs against lies & bullsh!t posted on here & the guesswork (based on more guesswork, chinese whispers & "bar piss talk") on which way they voted.
by Armytank » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:04 am
by supercoach » Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:18 pm
by Armytank » Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:23 pm
supercoach wrote:Also hear there is a meeting between the NO clubs to the lofty amendment is being held next week to formulate the strategy to take to the AGM which ensures the vote on Echunga being promoted is passed. Also is putting together an alternate HFL board seeing the president and 5 directors are up for re-election. Time for change is obviously on the agenda now. Interesting times ahead.
by MONTE CRISTO » Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:54 pm
by Armytank » Thu Nov 21, 2013 1:45 pm
by cracka » Thu Nov 21, 2013 2:01 pm
Armytank wrote:supercoach wrote:Also hear there is a meeting between the NO clubs to the lofty amendment is being held next week to formulate the strategy to take to the AGM which ensures the vote on Echunga being promoted is passed. Also is putting together an alternate HFL board seeing the president and 5 directors are up for re-election. Time for change is obviously on the agenda now. Interesting times ahead.
Good to see some balls have been grown then, hey cracka?
by humour me » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:19 pm
by cracka » Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:43 pm
humour me wrote:supercoach wrote:Also hear there is a meeting between the NO clubs to the lofty amendment is being held next week to formulate the strategy to take to the AGM which ensures the vote on Echunga being promoted is passed. Also is putting together an alternate HFL board seeing the president and 5 directors are up for re-election. Time for change is obviously on the agenda now. Interesting times ahead
Interesting that there is a meeting being held by the NO clubs. Who's the guru that has worked out who the no clubs are in this secret ballot. Sounds like a crock to me. And I'll be interested in knowing who this alternative board is to. I'm guessing this is in your imagination supercoach.
The 2013 Central Division A grade comp was as good as it's ever been in terms of being competitive with no easy games. If it ain't broke.......
by cracka » Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:46 pm
by has been » Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:40 pm
by humour me » Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:12 pm
has been wrote:. Think u will find super coach is right on the money. Lobey obviously were not invited to the NO meeting as they voted yes to support. Funny about that for a club that was so piss poor for nearly a decade. Your club has 1 half decent year and u think u are ants pants. Maybe that's why you got your nick name. Humour us all a little more in a week when you come back on and say how wrong your little comment was and also realize then that the overturned application will be reversed again by the clubs and lofty will have to do the right thing and abide by the rules and the spirit of the game. Oh by the way Humour me the only reason you stayed in central was that no country club applied to come up. Call that luck certainly not good man agent.
by The Panther » Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:44 am
by cracka » Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:57 am
The Panther wrote:My opinion as a follower of Echunga.
1. I was and am still against us going up to Central.
Why: It's not because i want the club to stay in Country for ever , I don't. I believe it is an admirable goal for the club to want to go up to the next level, but when we are ready as a club.
My feelings are we should take 12 months and really plan for it.
A. our B grade scraped into the finals in country.
B. Under 17's won one game.
C. Under 15's missed finals.
D. No under 13's.
E. Extra cost in running a Central Division A grade team.
Yes our A grade was undefeated, but the rest of the club needs some serious building to compete as a club at Central Division.
Cliche : "The house will fall without good foundations".
BUT,
The club had a meeting and voted to go up. The HFL voted it through or to continue with the promotion / relegation system effectively voting it through.
Then at the eleventh hour the HFL used a loophole to deny it .
So despite the fact, as an individual Echunga follower who thinks we could use 12 months to plan for promotion it does on the surface look poorly handled to say the least by the HFL members on the board involved in the decission making.
On the Mt.Lofty comments. It is completely understandable they would leave no stone unturned to do what is best for their club. The final outcome lies solely with the HFL. It is not a Echunga vs Lofty situation but a question of the rules and playing conditions in which all HFL clubs need to operate under.
My two cents worth.
by Armytank » Fri Nov 22, 2013 10:57 am
cracka wrote:Hey Armytank, did you get my pm, my settings say its still in the outbox & not sent yet.
by jumbo20 » Fri Nov 22, 2013 4:29 pm
by spot on » Fri Nov 22, 2013 7:01 pm
jumbo20 wrote:14 team comp gathering momentum?Echunga,Birdwood Nairne and Meadows
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |