Norwood Recruit Triple Magarey Medalist James Allan

[JK]

With Norwood able to recruit just two players from outside the club ‘s promotional zone due to penalties for breaching the salary cap, Ross said addressing the midfield was the priority.

FFS, we didn't breach the salary cap, we weren't even close to being over the salary cap.

Yes we did. Didn't exceed the cap, but we breached the policies in place.

[Brodlach]

Of course, Norwood HAD a recruiting ban on them for salary cap breaches but the inclusion of the Crows into the competition saw that ban relaxed, allowing them to replace Crows Luke Brown and Mitch Grigg who they were bargaining on playing a lot of football at The Parade next year.
Now, the money question: Which club changed its mind, giving the Crows the numbers they needed to enter said competition again?

The ban wasn't "relaxed". The ban from McGuiness' contract change is still in place, but they are allowed to replace the players they've lost to the Crows and Power. Same as every other club including West and Port - who actually did breach the salary cap

West ban is up now anyway

[Fricky]

With Norwood able to recruit just two players from outside the club ‘s promotional zone due to penalties for breaching the salary cap, Ross said addressing the midfield was the priority.

FFS, we didn't breach the salary cap, we weren't even close to being over the salary cap.

Yes we did. Didn't exceed the cap, but we breached the policies in place.

Ok, I'll take that. But when anyone mentions "salary cap breach" everyone jumps straight to a club spending more money than they should have on player payments and dipsh!ts keep putting that on Norwood. As you can tell it really gives me the sh!ts since we didn't exceed the cap at all .

[heater31]

With Norwood able to recruit just two players from outside the club ‘s promotional zone due to penalties for breaching the salary cap, Ross said addressing the midfield was the priority.

FFS, we didn't breach the salary cap, we weren't even close to being over the salary cap.

Yes we did. Didn't exceed the cap, but we breached the policies in place.

Ok, I'll take that. But when anyone mentions "salary cap breach" everyone jumps straight to a club spending more money than they should have on player payments and dipsh!ts keep putting that on Norwood. As you can tell it really gives me the sh!ts since we didn't exceed the cap at all .

But you broke the rules relating to the cap and deserve all crap flung in Norwood's direction IMO

[JK]

Ok, I'll take that. But when anyone mentions "salary cap breach" everyone jumps straight to a club spending more money than they should have on player payments and dipsh!ts keep putting that on Norwood. As you can tell it really gives me the sh!ts since we didn't exceed the cap at all .

But you broke the rules relating to the cap and deserve all crap flung in Norwood's direction IMO

Yep, a breach is a breach, so we have to wear that

[Fricky]

Ok, I'll take that. But when anyone mentions "salary cap breach" everyone jumps straight to a club spending more money than they should have on player payments and dipsh!ts keep putting that on Norwood. As you can tell it really gives me the sh!ts since we didn't exceed the cap at all .

But you broke the rules relating to the cap and deserve all crap flung in Norwood's direction IMO

Yep, a breach is a breach, so we have to wear that

Agreed. Just make sure its the right crap that's being flung . None of this "over the salary cap" stuff.

But I guess winning back to back flags means people will find whatever they can to fling at us. Here's hoping for some more crap to be flung at us when we go 3 in a row .

[Doddy]

Ok, I'll take that. But when anyone mentions "salary cap breach" everyone jumps straight to a club spending more money than they should have on player payments and dipsh!ts keep putting that on Norwood. As you can tell it really gives me the sh!ts since we didn't exceed the cap at all .

But you broke the rules relating to the cap and deserve all crap flung in Norwood's direction IMO

Yep, a breach is a breach, so we have to wear that

Agreed. Just make sure its the right crap that's being flung . None of this "over the salary cap" stuff.

But I guess winning back to back flags means people will find whatever they can to fling at us. Here's hoping for some more crap to be flung at us when we go 3 in a row .

We can start early if you're keen.

[Fricky]

Pretty sure its already started Doddy

[Harry the Horse]

Of course, Norwood HAD a recruiting ban on them for salary cap breaches but the inclusion of the Crows into the competition saw that ban relaxed, allowing them to replace Crows Luke Brown and Mitch Grigg who they were bargaining on playing a lot of football at The Parade next year.
Now, the money question: Which club changed its mind, giving the Crows the numbers they needed to enter said competition again?

The ban wasn't "relaxed". The ban from McGuiness' contract change is still in place, but they are allowed to replace the players they've lost to the Crows and Power. Same as every other club including West and Port - who actually did breach the salary cap

Semantics.

[o five]

Back flips continue at Norwood
Must say it makes me feel ill seeing the little champion in those colours.
Oh well if the stories are true about Jimmy and North, I wish him well in his retirement years.
Just be sad not seeing him holding up the cup next year at North.

[o five]

On another note. How many Magarey Medallist have Norwood picked up from other SANFL clubs now?

[SDK]

Jars
Tim W

[o five]

Thanks! They were the only two that I could come up with. Now you can add Allan to the list.

[sjt]

What a corrupt league we have. Norwood having their penalties lifted is a farce. I hope it hurts north for voting yes.

[Trent Plucktrum]

Can't wait to hear from old potsy pullmypud regarding this signing as he's always had such nice things to say about jimmys ability and hard ball gets , but maybe he will get his number sewn onto his moss green sports coat with the matching leather elbow patchs

[SDK]

Norwood had no penalties lifted !

[Groucho]

It seems the Norwood dictionary doesn't contain a definition for the term "Salary Cap" but has the same definition for the words No & Yes.

[sjt]

Norwood had no penalties lifted !

Oh right. So they had no limit on recruiting from outside their zone? We all know the truth, I choose not to believe " joe speak".

[Long live SAnFL]

Welcome to Norwood James you look much better in red and blue!

[jim5112]

With Norwood able to recruit just two players from outside the club ‘s promotional zone due to penalties for breaching the salary cap, Ross said addressing the midfield was the priority.

FFS, we didn't breach the salary cap, we weren't even close to being over the salary cap.

Yes we did. Didn't exceed the cap, but we breached the policies in place.

Ok, I'll take that. But when anyone mentions "salary cap breach" everyone jumps straight to a club spending more money than they should have on player payments and dipsh!ts keep putting that on Norwood. As you can tell it really gives me the sh!ts since we didn't exceed the cap at all .

"salary cap breach". See you in twenty minutes. Do you take the paper with you?