by jet-airport » Tue Feb 04, 2014 1:14 pm
by shoe boy » Tue Feb 04, 2014 1:42 pm
leftpeg wrote:Does anyone know the outcome of the vote regarding whether or not the SFL will adopt the FDC recommendations?
I believe this vote took place at the SFL Committee meeting last night.
by leftpeg » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:14 pm
shoe boy wrote:leftpeg wrote:Does anyone know the outcome of the vote regarding whether or not the SFL will adopt the FDC recommendations?
I believe this vote took place at the SFL Committee meeting last night.
LEFTPEG all I can say
by shoe boy » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:09 am
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Feb 05, 2014 3:33 pm
leftpeg wrote:Does anyone know the outcome of the vote regarding whether or not the SFL will adopt the FDC recommendations?
I believe this vote took place at the SFL Committee meeting last night.
by leftpeg » Wed Feb 05, 2014 9:23 pm
shoe boy wrote:No, they chose to do nothing!
When will they realise that the board are elected to represent the clubs! and not the interests of a minority.
The board put in place a FDC that had a difficult role but not withstanding put together a document that would not please all.
It would appear the board doesn't like the recommendations but as they say when you dig deep you might not like what you find!
I will finish with a quote! "Change is the law of life.And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future"
by shoe boy » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:54 am
Look Good In Leather wrote:leftpeg wrote:Does anyone know the outcome of the vote regarding whether or not the SFL will adopt the FDC recommendations?
I believe this vote took place at the SFL Committee meeting last night.
Vote deferred until June to allow the SFL board to meet with each club individually. Drags it out a bit, but now we at least have a date where hopefully we will get a decision one way or the other so our clubs can prepare accordingly.
by Tiger83 » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:58 am
by Waterboy » Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:26 am
Tiger83 wrote:For the un-intiated.. Whats the proposal we are discussing here?? Apologies if its been posted previously..
by cracka » Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:30 pm
by leftpeg » Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:51 pm
cracka wrote:So nothing about going back to 2 divisions at all.
by tigerpie » Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:56 pm
by Keyser Soze » Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:00 pm
shoe boy wrote:No, they chose to do nothing!
When will they realise that the board are elected to represent the clubs! and not the interests of a minority.
The board put in place a FDC that had a difficult role but not withstanding put together a document that would not please all.
It would appear the board doesn't like the recommendations but as they say when you dig deep you might not like what you find!
I will finish with a quote! "Change is the law of life.And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future"
by marbles » Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:02 pm
leftpeg wrote:cracka wrote:So nothing about going back to 2 divisions at all.
DEFINITELY NOT!! That would mean the FDC would actually have to address the problem for which they were created (trying to minimise the weekly 100+pt thrashings in Senior Grades).
by shoe boy » Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:27 am
by Champ » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:28 pm
Waterboy wrote:Tiger83 wrote:For the un-intiated.. Whats the proposal we are discussing here?? Apologies if its been posted previously..
These are the Future Directions Committee recommendations that are to be voted on
FDC Recommendation 1
The Saturday match program should be restructured as follows:
• Junior Colts (currently U/16) should change to U/15.
• Senior Colts (currently U/18) should change to U/17.
• The Sub-Junior Colts grade (currently U/14) should be removed from the Saturday Program.
FDC Recommendation 2
• An optional third senior grade competition should be created and played in the current U/18 time slot.
• The U/15 and U/17 games should be played in the current U/14 and U/16 time slots.
FDC Recommendation 3
• The existing Saturday Sub-Junior Colts grade (currently U/14) should be moved to Sunday mornings and changed to U/13.
FDC Recommendation 4
• The Sunday overflow junior grade (currently U/14) should be changed to U/15 to re-align with the Saturday junior grades.
FDC Recommendation 5
• The Saturday grades A-Grade, B-Grade, U/17 and U/15 should be made compulsory to field in order to affiliate with the Southern Football League.
FDC Recommendation 6
• The Southern Football League should adopt a fixed timeline for implementation of the proposed changes.
by Waterboy » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:11 pm
Champ wrote:Waterboy wrote:Tiger83 wrote:For the un-intiated.. Whats the proposal we are discussing here?? Apologies if its been posted previously..
These are the Future Directions Committee recommendations that are to be voted on
FDC Recommendation 1
The Saturday match program should be restructured as follows:
• Junior Colts (currently U/16) should change to U/15.
• Senior Colts (currently U/18) should change to U/17.
• The Sub-Junior Colts grade (currently U/14) should be removed from the Saturday Program.
FDC Recommendation 2
• An optional third senior grade competition should be created and played in the current U/18 time slot.
• The U/15 and U/17 games should be played in the current U/14 and U/16 time slots.
FDC Recommendation 3
• The existing Saturday Sub-Junior Colts grade (currently U/14) should be moved to Sunday mornings and changed to U/13.
FDC Recommendation 4
• The Sunday overflow junior grade (currently U/14) should be changed to U/15 to re-align with the Saturday junior grades.
FDC Recommendation 5
• The Saturday grades A-Grade, B-Grade, U/17 and U/15 should be made compulsory to field in order to affiliate with the Southern Football League.
FDC Recommendation 6
• The Southern Football League should adopt a fixed timeline for implementation of the proposed changes.
What a farce! I thought everyone was dead behind the 'FDC' as it was finally going to point out the flaws in the current structure and more importantly suggestions to fix them?
Personally I dont understand why the need to move away from the SANFL under age categories - can someone give me an insight? Which clubs actually dont already fulfill 4 teams? Lonsdale?
by shoe boy » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:20 pm
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:39 pm
by Keyser Soze » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:23 pm
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:Don't forget last season Brighton was initially unable to field a Saturday U16 side as well. So they would have only had 4/5 teams if the criteria was enforced last year
To enable their players to get club footy games, the SFL allowed both Brighton & Morphettville Park Sunday U16 teams to play against the Saturday program U16's teams, with those matches played on Sundays
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |