by tommygun16 » Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:13 pm
by tommygun16 » Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:32 pm
by Felch » Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:47 pm
by heater31 » Sun Jun 17, 2007 10:40 pm
tommygun16 wrote:SAAFL must be different to country footy in that there is trial by video, we dont have trial by video in the country. I wouldnt have thought that there is trial by video, especially in division 4 & footage taken from one club? I could be wrong though.
Do you guys tape all your games or was this just a special occasion?
by Iron Fist » Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:20 pm
Iron Fist wrote:I put them in before but here they are again
portland v Rosewater
Unley v salisbury
north haven v Pulteney OS
mitcham v Pooraka
Ingle Farm v para hills
who u going for tommygun????
by Micky McFinnigan » Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:48 pm
by heater31 » Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:54 pm
by Iron Fist » Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 pm
heater31 wrote:I hear the 1st qtr was very heated I didn't see the incidents has I was playing on another oval but blood was drawn and the club is now seeking legal advice on what further action can be taken if any
by heater31 » Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:12 pm
by Iron Fist » Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:18 pm
heater31 wrote:Like I said before I didn't see the incident nor have I seen the video of it either, the legal advice thing is dinkum as of around 5.15pm Saturday afternoon when I last heard of it. If there is talk of legal action then it must have been an unprovoked attack and just plain stupidity on the alleged offender's behalf.
by heater31 » Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:24 pm
Iron Fist wrote:heater31 wrote:Like I said before I didn't see the incident nor have I seen the video of it either, the legal advice thing is dinkum as of around 5.15pm Saturday afternoon when I last heard of it. If there is talk of legal action then it must have been an unprovoked attack and just plain stupidity on the alleged offender's behalf.
indeed it must have been a bit stupid act
do u have any idea what number the offender was heater?????
was he reported by the field umpires aswell or not??
by Iron Fist » Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:26 pm
heater31 wrote:Iron Fist wrote:heater31 wrote:Like I said before I didn't see the incident nor have I seen the video of it either, the legal advice thing is dinkum as of around 5.15pm Saturday afternoon when I last heard of it. If there is talk of legal action then it must have been an unprovoked attack and just plain stupidity on the alleged offender's behalf.
indeed it must have been a bit stupid act
do u have any idea what number the offender was heater?????
was he reported by the field umpires aswell or not??
I only got to see the last quarter and our guy who copped it was standing at FF but where he was at the time of the incident I have no idea, I think that is what the main issue is about that the field umpires did nothing about it and we have the video to prove it.
by Mayaswell » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:11 pm
heater31 wrote:Like I said before I didn't see the incident nor have I seen the video of it either, the legal advice thing is dinkum as of around 5.15pm Saturday afternoon when I last heard of it. If there is talk of legal action then it must have been an unprovoked attack and just plain stupidity on the alleged offender's behalf.
by heater31 » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:17 pm
by Mayaswell » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:19 pm
heater31 wrote:If you are talking about no.23 then no he has admitted that he got what he deserved this is a different incident
by Iron Fist » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:22 pm
Mayaswell wrote:heater31 wrote:Like I said before I didn't see the incident nor have I seen the video of it either, the legal advice thing is dinkum as of around 5.15pm Saturday afternoon when I last heard of it. If there is talk of legal action then it must have been an unprovoked attack and just plain stupidity on the alleged offender's behalf.
are you saying that the incident was unprovoked or is that what you are taking from the club looking at legal action?
what do you call unprovoked? if someone was to say something to you would you call that unprovoked? the guy from pultney, is he saying that it was unprovoked?
by heater31 » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:23 pm
Mayaswell wrote:heater31 wrote:If you are talking about no.23 then no he has admitted that he got what he deserved this is a different incident
no not at all, I didnt see this game I was just asking why you thought the other incident was unprovoked.
by Iron Fist » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:28 pm
heater31 wrote:Mayaswell wrote:heater31 wrote:If you are talking about no.23 then no he has admitted that he got what he deserved this is a different incident
no not at all, I didnt see this game I was just asking why you thought the other incident was unprovoked.
When Legal advice was mentioned I gathered that it was unprovoked it it must have been serious for this type of discussion to occur
Fisty, I don't know all I know is that it is been looked into further like you say nothing may not eventuate out of it but it is being looked at. It could be a simple case of a please explain from the umpiring department and nothing else
by Westsider » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:50 pm
by Iron Fist » Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:01 pm
Westsider wrote:Hey fisty, I aint heard anything, then again I wasn't around the club at all on Saturday... too busy!
Rib is still sore, dunno if i'll be playing this week either.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |