Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

All discussions to do with the SANFL
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Not dying alone
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by The Sleeping Giant »

How did the power's c grade go?
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
Legs Man
Under 16s
Posts: 497
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:02 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Legs Man »

Good first up win by The Legs against questionable opposition.

Must admit I was expecting a better display by Port - but i suppose a Reserves side against a League side is going to gain the result shown.

Shouldn't Port be playing in the reserves comp?
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
Posts: 51723
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 2153 times
Been thanked: 4093 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Wedgie »

The Sleeping Giant wrote:How did the power's c grade go?

Beat Norwoods B grade 14.8 92 to 9.12 66.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
tkr
Rookie
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 12:22 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Greater Western Sydney
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 19 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by tkr »

Ted E Bear wrote:I thought the umps let it go to much, so many ballups. So many tackles and no holding the ball. It wasted so much time. Hence the low score


They must be AFL reserves umpires then, following orders from the AFL umpire coach!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47501
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4842 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Dutchy »

kickinit wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Port Magpies players are playing in a team they dont want to be in but also cant get dropped from!


and how do you know this?


If I need to spell it out to you, they want to be in the AFL side, but also cannot/will not be dropped to the reserves, unlike previously in the SANFL, so you have to wonder what their mindset.

In the other hand they were playing against players last night that have busted their gut all their life to make SANFL level. It was interesting to watch the different body language and team play of both sides, vastly different.
Macca19
League - Best 21
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:54 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Ports
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 10 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Macca19 »

Players will be dropped.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Booney »

Dutchy wrote:
kickinit wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Port Magpies players are playing in a team they dont want to be in but also cant get dropped from!


and how do you know this?


If I need to spell it out to you, they want to be in the AFL side, but also cannot/will not be dropped to the reserves, unlike previously in the SANFL, so you have to wonder what their mindset.

In the other hand they were playing against players last night that have busted their gut all their life to make SANFL level. It was interesting to watch the different body language and team play of both sides, vastly different.


Round 1. See what happens as the season unfolds, or shall we assume 2 hours of footy is a sound gauge for the rest of the year?

We'll assume I'd imagine, whinge a bit, grizzle and whinge some more.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Booney »

Macca19 wrote:Players will be dropped.


Exactly why Port wanted to maintain our 18's, reserves and SANFL league structure to avoid the "gifting" of games. I guess we work to the system the other clubs want us to and we end up with no SANFL reserves to work the players through.

That's the system they wanted, they've got it.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
Macca19
League - Best 21
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:54 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Ports
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 10 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Macca19 »

Ted E Bear wrote:I would say Port will delist a lot of players that played tonight. They were awful and shown up big time. Who seriously could hold their head up that was on the Power list tonight? Name them


Young was excellent and will get a well deserved call up in the next couple of weeks I imagine. Harvey and Byrne-Jones for debutants showed a lot of promise. Logan and Stewart were good enough. Mitchell was good inside but lacked outside run. That would be it. O'Shea is injured and shouldnt be playing, Colqhoun was poor, Neade disappointing, Amon lacked consistency of effort, AhChee wont be on the list next year and Renouf is the ruck equivalent of a NFL punter.
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:11 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by JK »

Macca19 wrote:
Ted E Bear wrote:I would say Port will delist a lot of players that played tonight. They were awful and shown up big time. Who seriously could hold their head up that was on the Power list tonight? Name them


Young was excellent and will get a well deserved call up in the next couple of weeks I imagine. Harvey and Byrne-Jones for debutants showed a lot of promise. Logan and Stewart were good enough. Mitchell was good inside but lacked outside run. That would be it. O'Shea is injured and shouldnt be playing, Colqhoun was poor, Neade disappointing, Amon lacked consistency of effort, AhChee wont be on the list next year and Renouf is the ruck equivalent of a NFL punter.


Its also only one game of football, far too soon to be judging who survives the cut. I still think whilst relatively healthy, Port will win most of their games. Do you have any other forwards to come in? Because there doesnt seem to be a lot of cover for Schultz or Butcher otherwise.
FUSC
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by topsywaldron »

Booney wrote:
Macca19 wrote:Players will be dropped.


Exactly why Port wanted to maintain our 18's, reserves and SANFL league structure to avoid the "gifting" of games. I guess we work to the system the other clubs want us to and we end up with no SANFL reserves to work the players through.

That's the system they wanted, they've got it.


Nothing to do with developing fringe players with a view to drafting them of course.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
Bombers4EVA
League - Best 21
Posts: 1769
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:05 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 89 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Bombers4EVA »

If that Ranga up forward for Port had of kicked straight and not out of bounds on the full twice. Then the score couldve been a lot different. Took a good one hander. But cant kick for shite.
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Team: Collingwood
Team: Kenilworth
Location: Craven Cottage
Has thanked: 541 times
Been thanked: 326 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by LPH »

Admittedly I watched the game on TV & that can jade one's perception of the game but...

From what I saw, Port didn't appear to have much cohesion in terms of ball movement - particularly from defence.

I like the look of Murphy (17) from Norwood, looks a real 'goer' - tackles very well & has pace too.
Am I right that his old man was @ Sydney during the '80s - no. 35?
Don't think he will be at Norwood too long, when does he turn 18 & eligible for the Draft?

Have to agree somewhat with Dutchy though, I reckon there would be an element of truth in the fact that not being under pressure to perform for one's spot in the team, means that an element of doubt or reluctance to be 100% committed (at times) to a contest, could creep in to a player's mindset, couldn't it?

Must say the commentary was ordinary - as was the audio of the Producer telling them they would be going to Ad Breaks @ the next goal.
On that; Was the umpire confused a couple of times, looking for the 'light' to alert him that the TV had returned from the break & he could restart the game?

Excellent Crowd too for a Thursday Night - but was it a small Port contingent?
Appeared heaps of Norwood but no that much Port?
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6640
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by RB »

Did the Power promise 4k/game or was that just the Crows? From what I hear there were slightly more than 2k Norwood fans.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by topsywaldron »

RB wrote:Did the Power promise 4k/game or was that just the Crows? From what I hear there were slightly more than 2k Norwood fans.


How dare you hold people to account for broken promises, half truths and flat out lies.

Roll over and celebrate the #newera like all true fans of South Australian football.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Booney »

topsywaldron wrote:
Booney wrote:
Macca19 wrote:Players will be dropped.


Exactly why Port wanted to maintain our 18's, reserves and SANFL league structure to avoid the "gifting" of games. I guess we work to the system the other clubs want us to and we end up with no SANFL reserves to work the players through.

That's the system they wanted, they've got it.


Nothing to do with developing fringe players with a view to drafting them of course.


Yes, we'd cunningly hide them from the view of all the other AFL clubs by playing them at SANFL reserves level, maybe hide them in the league side. Nobody would ever have seen them..... :roll:
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
Legs Man
Under 16s
Posts: 497
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:02 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Legs Man »

Wonder who KT was barracking for last night?
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64118
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8796 times
Been thanked: 12740 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by Booney »

LEH wrote:Have to agree somewhat with Dutchy though, I reckon there would be an element of truth in the fact that not being under pressure to perform for one's spot in the team, means that an element of doubt or reluctance to be 100% committed (at times) to a contest, could creep in to a player's mindset, couldn't it?


Let's assume ( as everyone is ) the only thing on a Magpie players mind is getting picked at AFL level, do you think going in half arsed is going to do his cause any good? Of course not.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
cennals05
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:43 pm
Team: Central District
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 248 times
Contact:

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by cennals05 »

Legs Man wrote:Wonder who KT was barracking for last night?

Or Richard Kelly who after being on the Norwood board that changed their vote to yes promptly took up a role with Power.
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Round 1- Norwood v Port @ Norwood Post Match

Post by topsywaldron »

cennals05 wrote:
Legs Man wrote:Wonder who KT was barracking for last night?

Or Richard Kelly who after being on the Norwood board that changed their vote to yes promptly took up a role with Power.


He was very involved in changing our vote to yes then accepted a job offer at a club who benefited from the changed vote.

Not that I'm insinuating anything of course.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MannyK and 261 guests