Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26496
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:40 pm
Team: Glenelg
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by dedja »

RustyCage wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
RustyCage wrote:
Dutchy wrote:The competition is a farce, as many predicted.


Last week showed that comment is crap.


Why is that? its reality to many people, crowds and interest in the comp is down from last year.


The margin in no way reflects what Port will do to teams this year just because of how bad Glenelg were.


Yes, I have to agree with that.

I've seen some insipid performances over 40 odd years but that was up there with the worst.

I don't believe much should be taken from the AFL aspect. Sure, Port played well and all dues to them, but the Bays were utterly disgraceful.

The season is well and truly shot after round 2.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
clanger
Under 16s
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:41 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by clanger »

so with Glenelg putting in one of the clubs worst performance of all time South will have their shortest price tag as favorites for the last 20-25yrs.
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:15 am
Team: Collingwood
Team: Kenilworth
Location: Craven Cottage
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by LPH »

dedja wrote:
Yes, I have to agree with that.

I've seen some insipid performances over 40 odd years but that was up there with the worst.

I don't believe much should be taken from the AFL aspect. Sure, Port played well and all dues to them, but the Bays were utterly disgraceful.

The season is well and truly shot after round 2.


Surely not dedja?
Bit early for that, isn't it?
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
frogcake
Mini-League
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 4:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by frogcake »

Perhaps we should see this as a good dose of karma.

For years we sat back and laughed at Port Adelaide while all their money went to propping up our beloved SANFL clubs. Now we have become so dependent on that money that Port (and Adelaide) have the SANFL teams at their mercy.
StrayDog
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:56 pm
Team: Central District
Location: Carpark.
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by StrayDog »

Macca19 wrote:Every team would have beat them by 100 today. They were that bad.

Being beaten 100 points would have been a considerably more desirable.
"— here I opened wide the door; —
Darkness there, and nothing more."


- Edgar Allan Poe from " The Raven "

tkr
Rookie
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 12:52 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Greater Western Sydney
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by tkr »

frogcake wrote:Perhaps we should see this as a good dose of karma.

For years we sat back and laughed at Port Adelaide while all their money went to propping up our beloved SANFL clubs. Now we have become so dependent on that money that Port (and Adelaide) have the SANFL teams at their mercy.


Wrong!!!

The karma is for the 6 SANFL teams that voted for the AFL reserves to play in the SANFL!
Punk Rooster
Coach
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:00 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Collingwood
Team: Fitzroy
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by Punk Rooster »

RB wrote:
the observer wrote:The bays have been RIP since their main side the crows went in .Dont blame the current set up
They did finish top in 2008 and 2009 and second only on percentage the following year.
..and out in straight sets- both years :lol:
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
UK Fan
Coach
Posts: 6366
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:11 am
Team: Central District
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by UK Fan »

Punk Rooster wrote:
RB wrote:
the observer wrote:The bays have been RIP since their main side the crows went in .Dont blame the current set up
They did finish top in 2008 and 2009 and second only on percentage the following year.
..and out in straight sets- both years :lol:

Bays Played in a GF in 2008
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
kneedeepinthehoopla
Under 16s
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:29 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Carlton
Location: Reedy Creek
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by kneedeepinthehoopla »

Punk Rooster wrote:
RB wrote:
the observer wrote:The bays have been RIP since their main side the crows went in .Dont blame the current set up
They did finish top in 2008 and 2009 and second only on percentage the following year.
..and out in straight sets- both years :lol:

Lost the GF in '08, must've won a final in there somewhere. Appreciate the usual intelligent contribution though, punky.
As for today, oh boy. Yuck.
tkr
Rookie
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 12:52 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Greater Western Sydney
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by tkr »

UK Fan wrote:
Punk Rooster wrote:
RB wrote:
the observer wrote:The bays have been RIP since their main side the crows went in .Dont blame the current set up
They did finish top in 2008 and 2009 and second only on percentage the following year.
..and out in straight sets- both years :lol:

Bays Played in a GF in 2008


oops! :oops: :oops:
Macca19
League - Best 21
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:24 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Ports
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by Macca19 »

People can complain that that result was due to the Magpies being an AFL reserves team but I really don't think it had anything to do with it at all. That's up there with that Geelong v Melbourne match a couple of years back as being the most uncompetitive ive ever seen a football side at any level ive watched.

No system, no structure, certainly no leadership, no midfield pressure, no forward line, no helping out in defence. To start like that? Horrible. They had 10 minutes of good play in the 2nd quarter when Port lost three players to injury in the space of 90 seconds and couldn't make any interchanges for 15 minutes. But after that, they had completely given up by halfway through the 3rd quarter.

If Glenelg the club, its supporters, or other supporters want to blame that margin on Port being a reserves side, then go ahead. But, its a complete and utter copout and hiding the fact that Glenelg really were that bad.
sjt
League - Best 21
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:56 pm
Team: Central District
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by sjt »

Does Nick Stevens feel he owes the power something, for the way he left. :)
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
Posts: 16794
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:12 am
Team: Sturt
Location: the back blocks
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by heater31 »

Macca19 wrote:People can complain that that result was due to the Magpies being an AFL reserves team but I really don't think it had anything to do with it at all. That's up there with that Geelong v Melbourne match a couple of years back as being the most uncompetitive ive ever seen a football side at any level ive watched.

No system, no structure, certainly no leadership, no midfield pressure, no forward line, no helping out in defence. To start like that? Horrible. They had 10 minutes of good play in the 2nd quarter when Port lost three players to injury in the space of 90 seconds and couldn't make any interchanges for 15 minutes. But after that, they had completely given up by halfway through the 3rd quarter.

If Glenelg the club, its supporters, or other supporters want to blame that margin on Port being a reserves side, then go ahead. But, its a complete and utter copout and hiding the fact that Glenelg really were that bad.



Stevens under pressure to get results? Can't believe that they are this bad given their list of AFL experienced ins.

Might be a Good Friday massacre this week then. Extremely tough to back it up with a 5 day break, poor form and a rampant opposition looking to stamp its authority on the competition and make a massive statement on its home ground.
Macca19
League - Best 21
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:24 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Ports
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by Macca19 »

Thorp was horrendous. Clurey ran off him all day and provided little up forward. Alleway was getting frustrated and spent the second half trying to pick people off behind the play. Jolly did nothing. Joseph was just about the only mid trying to create and have a run. Lonergan, meh.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
Posts: 9859
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:27 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by gadj1976 »

sjt wrote:Does Nick Stevens feel he owes the power something, for the way he left. :)


No, he's being groomed for the soon to be vacant Carlton job.
StrayDog
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:56 pm
Team: Central District
Location: Carpark.
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by StrayDog »

Macca19 wrote:People can complain that that result was due to the Magpies being an AFL reserves team but I really don't think it had anything to do with it at all. That's up there with that Geelong v Melbourne match a couple of years back as being the most uncompetitive ive ever seen a football side at any level ive watched.

No system, no structure, certainly no leadership, no midfield pressure, no forward line, no helping out in defence. To start like that? Horrible. They had 10 minutes of good play in the 2nd quarter when Port lost three players to injury in the space of 90 seconds and couldn't make any interchanges for 15 minutes. But after that, they had completely given up by halfway through the 3rd quarter.

If Glenelg the club, its supporters, or other supporters want to blame that margin on Port being a reserves side, then go ahead. But, its a complete and utter copout and hiding the fact that Glenelg really were that bad.

I think it's far too early to tell what effect the current structure will have. Later in the season? Maybe. Three to five years and the trends, if any, become much less disputable.

Wouldn't be too many seasons where sides have been so demoralised, so insipid, this early in the piece. The good folk down at Brighton Road and their long suffering faithful shouldn't be the only ones hoping this isn't a sign of things to come for Glenelg.
"— here I opened wide the door; —
Darkness there, and nothing more."


- Edgar Allan Poe from " The Raven "

Bounce of the ball
Reserves
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:40 am
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by Bounce of the ball »

A typical Glenelg response by many . I wish they'd comment about the game when they lose.
passionatelegsfan
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:25 pm
Team: Norwood
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by passionatelegsfan »

So the port power reserves get hammered by an undermanned norwood who in turn cop a flogging from centrals at elizabeth. This would inducate that the norwood side that beat port power reserves last week is not that strong at present. So what does that say about the bays after copping todays hammering? On another note i think that 8 teams is not enough. I think torrens and woodville should unmerge and they bring up a side from amateur league.
User avatar
scott
Veteran
Posts: 3760
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:23 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Location: Noarlunga Oval
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by scott »

First to bite wins a bike.
jim5112
Rookie
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:23 pm
Team: Central District
Contact:

Re: Round 2 - Port Reserves v Glenelg Post Match

Post by jim5112 »

UK Fan wrote:
Punk Rooster wrote:
RB wrote:
the observer wrote:The bays have been RIP since their main side the crows went in .Dont blame the current set up
They did finish top in 2008 and 2009 and second only on percentage the following year.
..and out in straight sets- both years :lol:

Bays Played in a GF in 2008


... the point is still substantially correct -- Glenelg did NOT finish 1st in 2008/2009 or 2nd in 2010.

They did win ONE finals match in a row and kept their pants in 2008.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dissident and 270 guests