easy TIGA wrote:Never spent 70 k plus a year just to clarify.
Well that's not true..
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:12 pm
easy TIGA wrote:Never spent 70 k plus a year just to clarify.
by jo172 » Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:22 pm
easy TIGA wrote:Robb_Stark wrote:i found it funny that Kilburn were even being considered for a curtain raiser game before the AFL......what sort of message would that send the club they get rewarded for spending 70k plus a year in player payments to buy up the ranks only to cut payments and lose there team get pumped by 50 plus goals a game and then be rewarded with exposure at a afl match
i wonder since the meeting also will we see a change in the rules/law of the saafl to give them greater power so a repeat of kilburn joke does not happen again in a higher div
Never spent 70 k plus a year just to clarify.
by downspine » Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:07 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:09 pm
downspine wrote:Kilburns football director will openly tell you was it $90k
Interesteing in todays paper was about a certain gentleman who is coming back to be Chairman and save the club
Wasnt he the same individual who was Chairman who appointed previous Coach who then went out and spent this $90k on players
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:10 pm
by Cohiba » Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:28 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Also 70k is closer to the mark than 90k
by easy TIGA » Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:46 pm
Cohiba wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Also 70k is closer to the mark than 90k
Whatever $$$......too much as it turns out.........
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Apr 30, 2014 4:29 pm
easy TIGA wrote:The situation with them now has nothing to do with payments 2 o3 or 6 years ago. There are many underlying issues that have seen the a grade leave.
by beeroclock » Wed Apr 30, 2014 4:37 pm
by jo172 » Wed Apr 30, 2014 4:43 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:easy TIGA wrote:The situation with them now has nothing to do with payments 2 o3 or 6 years ago. There are many underlying issues that have seen the a grade leave.
Exactly, unfortunately this just doesn't seem to be sinking in to most people!
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Apr 30, 2014 4:47 pm
jo172 wrote:With all due respect it's hardly surprising that vague "underlying issues" are not sinking in when no one will particularise what they are.
by Footy Chick » Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:19 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:jo172 wrote:With all due respect it's hardly surprising that vague "underlying issues" are not sinking in when no one will particularise what they are.
I'm sick of trying to explain to people what they are, too many people with nothing to do with the club ALL KNOW BETTER So i've given up
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Cohiba » Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:06 pm
easy TIGA wrote:Cohiba wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Also 70k is closer to the mark than 90k
Whatever $$$......too much as it turns out.........
Let's get this right b4 bullshit takes over. The core group got looked after while they were. They werent chased or poached kilburn wanted to look after their own. While we did recruit a few, we still had points like the rest of them. Which we went 1 point over but thats a whole other story.these recruits were mates of mates at the club.. it was lower than 60k. Whether this was enough or not, this was affordable by the club at the time. The situation with them now has nothing to do with payments 2 o3 or 6 years ago. The are many underlying issues that have seen the a grade leave.
by Cohiba » Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:11 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:jo172 wrote:With all due respect it's hardly surprising that vague "underlying issues" are not sinking in when no one will particularise what they are.
I'm sick of trying to explain to people what they are, too many people with nothing to do with the club ALL KNOW BETTER So i've given up
by gadj1976 » Wed Apr 30, 2014 8:30 pm
downspine wrote:Kilburns football director will openly tell you was it $90k
Interesteing in todays paper was about a certain gentleman who is coming back to be Chairman and save the club
Wasnt he the same individual who was Chairman who appointed previous Coach who then went out and spent this $90k on players
by stan » Sun May 11, 2014 8:35 am
jo172 wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:easy TIGA wrote:The situation with them now has nothing to do with payments 2 o3 or 6 years ago. There are many underlying issues that have seen the a grade leave.
Exactly, unfortunately this just doesn't seem to be sinking in to most people!
With all due respect it's hardly surprising that vague "underlying issues" are not sinking in when no one will particularise what they are.
by stan » Sun May 11, 2014 8:39 am
by marbles » Sun May 11, 2014 11:17 am
by Bigshow82 » Sun May 11, 2014 11:24 am
marbles wrote:would it benefit all if...
kilburn
brahma lodge
angle vale
mitchell park
angle vale
flinders uni
wingfield
just all bailed and made their own little division for rest of the season and just played each other instead
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |