Booney wrote:"CHEATING" (Using capitals helps when getting your point across) would be playing outside of the rules governing the competition.
Ok then its REGULATED and LEGAL CHEATING endorsed by a incompetent SANFL !!!!!!!
by Apachebulldog » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:02 pm
Booney wrote:"CHEATING" (Using capitals helps when getting your point across) would be playing outside of the rules governing the competition.
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:04 pm
by Booney » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:07 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Doesn't change how I feel, but I do feel this debate has:
Guys, some of the nonsensical, paranoid commentary on this issue does our competition's cause no favours.
Stick with the actual issues and you'll help us better.
I may actually be done with it.
by Apachebulldog » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:11 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Doesn't change how I feel, but I do feel this debate has:
Guys, some of the nonsensical, paranoid commentary on this issue does our competition's cause no favours.
Stick with the actual issues and you'll help us better.
I may actually be done with it.
by wild dog » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:11 pm
StrayDog wrote:kickinit wrote:Wedgie wrote:matt35 wrote:
Have you been to Port game at AO this year? If you have or haven't here is message they play directed at people that think like you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1D1mh9o08eU
Being played directly to an audience of people that think like you.
by wild dog » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:15 pm
Rising Power wrote:You've hit the nail on the head. Once we entered the AFL, the AFL was and still is our main priority, but we still tried to get to a handful of SANFL games a year to see the Magpies team that was created to carry on the SANFL presence (and we still do). Having all the non-selected AFL players at the Magpies in the one team is fantastic; it's what (at a guess) 90% of Port supporters have wanted for years and now we have it. It's nice to see the prison bars running around still, that's why the club takes every opportunity to wear it at AFL level and also why our SANFL team wears it. But if it makes supporters of other SANFL clubs happier to say the magpies are dead etc, that's fine. Change the nickname from Magpies to Power, use the black V guernsey, it really doesn't matter, because as I said at the start, the AFL team is our main priority. Thanks for your support
by westcoastpanther » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:20 pm
by heater31 » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:21 pm
Wedgie wrote:PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB LIMITED
Former Name(s). PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB (A.F.L) LIMITED
ABN: 49 068 839 547
Registration Date: 29/03/1995
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:24 pm
Apachebulldog wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Doesn't change how I feel, but I do feel this debate has:
Guys, some of the nonsensical, paranoid commentary on this issue does our competition's cause no favours.
Stick with the actual issues and you'll help us better.
I may actually be done with it.
I can see why its so fine for you you have one foot in both camps.
You are one of many who wears two scarfs.
As they say its like having two bob eachway.
Explains it all i reckon LOL
by Rising Power » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:29 pm
wild dog wrote:Rising Power wrote:You've hit the nail on the head. Once we entered the AFL, the AFL was and still is our main priority, but we still tried to get to a handful of SANFL games a year to see the Magpies team that was created to carry on the SANFL presence (and we still do). Having all the non-selected AFL players at the Magpies in the one team is fantastic; it's what (at a guess) 90% of Port supporters have wanted for years and now we have it. It's nice to see the prison bars running around still, that's why the club takes every opportunity to wear it at AFL level and also why our SANFL team wears it. But if it makes supporters of other SANFL clubs happier to say the magpies are dead etc, that's fine. Change the nickname from Magpies to Power, use the black V guernsey, it really doesn't matter, because as I said at the start, the AFL team is our main priority. Thanks for your support
At least your honest.
So you have no issue with the zones being taken away, demise of the reserves reserves etc..
by Rising Power » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:36 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:Further proof the Magpies are Gonzo...
http://www.portlincolntimes.com.au/stor ... e/?cs=1500
by westcoastpanther » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:40 pm
Rising Power wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Further proof the Magpies are Gonzo...
http://www.portlincolntimes.com.au/stor ... e/?cs=1500
I do like the last line of that article. But really, have people been under a rock for the last 9 months? It was agreed that the zones would be realigned for 2015 onwards. Why is this such a surprise now?
by Booney » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:47 pm
johntheclaret wrote:I think that you will find "us lot" have already moved on from the "PAM does not exist anymore" debate...
by RB » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:49 pm
by RB » Thu Jun 19, 2014 12:56 pm
And for the record it was this comment which kicked off the recent activity on this thread. I guess it probably didn't merit even a response in hindsight.matt35 wrote:Not going to happen. AFL clubs are not going to agree to revert back to a system where their players are split among other clubs, not necessarily played in the positions the AFL clubs want etc. What you are proposing is basically a shift back to the previous system, which I know would suit the majority of posters on this whinge thread, but it's just not going to happen. Tinkering around the edges of the new system is about the best you will get I suspect.
As for the constant Magpies no longer exist rubbish I see running through this laughable thread, you people remind me of climate change deniers. The truth stares you in the face, but you all still scream it's not real it's not real! Magpies in the SANFL, Power in the AFL, it's actually not real hard!
by Rising Power » Thu Jun 19, 2014 1:17 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:Rising Power wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Further proof the Magpies are Gonzo...
http://www.portlincolntimes.com.au/stor ... e/?cs=1500
I do like the last line of that article. But really, have people been under a rock for the last 9 months? It was agreed that the zones would be realigned for 2015 onwards. Why is this such a surprise now?
No surprise, just further proof for the clowns that believe the Magpies still exist....
by RB » Thu Jun 19, 2014 1:37 pm
That's for Descartes to answer. IMO they only still exist at a superficial level.Rising Power wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Rising Power wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Further proof the Magpies are Gonzo...
http://www.portlincolntimes.com.au/stor ... e/?cs=1500
I do like the last line of that article. But really, have people been under a rock for the last 9 months? It was agreed that the zones would be realigned for 2015 onwards. Why is this such a surprise now?
No surprise, just further proof for the clowns that believe the Magpies still exist....
Just for some clarity, can someone define "the Magpies" and what constitutes "existence" please?
by Rising Power » Thu Jun 19, 2014 1:58 pm
RB wrote:That's for Descartes to answer. IMO they only still exist at a superficial level.Rising Power wrote:
Just for some clarity, can someone define "the Magpies" and what constitutes "existence" please?
by RB » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:01 pm
by Dutchy » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:22 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:
I hope that the people in charge make the right decisions later this year. I hope that an AFL seconds competition of some sort comes to fruition into the future.
I hope that my club continues to play in a competition of relevance.
I hope the words of our first premiership captain continue to ring true: "We are a club and we will go on".
But, as I said, I reckon I may actually be done with this debate.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |