Crows 2014
- Sorry Dude
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2658
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
[quote="bennymacca"]
more specifically on the game, i was a bit worried really early as brisbane seemed to have no pressure running through the midfield, and got a couple of really easy goals, but after that our midfield just got on top and it was all over from there. Im still slightly worried rockliff got 40 touches in a side that got smashed so comprehensively - it shows that without VB or Kerridge we probably cant shut players down, and that can hurt us against good teams i think.
Does this really matter when the guy had half of those possessions coming out the back half (and not really being damaging with it) and half of them again were give and go's which were not required in that bit of play?
I am not saying that it doesn't hurt us (and any team for that matter) when a player is dominating and using the ball well, but most teams have 3 or 4 players in lineup that can be damaging so I think a "run with" player is not as much as a concern for me as us being cleaner with the ball when we have it etc. There is the need for that type of player, but I think they need to be able to earn their own ball as much as shut down the opposition or if not, you just play an extra ball winning midfielder.
more specifically on the game, i was a bit worried really early as brisbane seemed to have no pressure running through the midfield, and got a couple of really easy goals, but after that our midfield just got on top and it was all over from there. Im still slightly worried rockliff got 40 touches in a side that got smashed so comprehensively - it shows that without VB or Kerridge we probably cant shut players down, and that can hurt us against good teams i think.
Does this really matter when the guy had half of those possessions coming out the back half (and not really being damaging with it) and half of them again were give and go's which were not required in that bit of play?
I am not saying that it doesn't hurt us (and any team for that matter) when a player is dominating and using the ball well, but most teams have 3 or 4 players in lineup that can be damaging so I think a "run with" player is not as much as a concern for me as us being cleaner with the ball when we have it etc. There is the need for that type of player, but I think they need to be able to earn their own ball as much as shut down the opposition or if not, you just play an extra ball winning midfielder.
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
fair point, i agree with you.
but for instance, if this was richmond next week and we allowed cotchin or boomer to get 40, that could very well be the difference between a win and a loss. it wasnt this week because rocky was basically playing a lone hand for them (he is really good to watch) but it could matter much more against other teams.
but for instance, if this was richmond next week and we allowed cotchin or boomer to get 40, that could very well be the difference between a win and a loss. it wasnt this week because rocky was basically playing a lone hand for them (he is really good to watch) but it could matter much more against other teams.
- Sorry Dude
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2658
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
bennymacca wrote:fair point, i agree with you.
but for instance, if this was richmond next week and we allowed cotchin or boomer to get 40, that could very well be the difference between a win and a loss. it wasnt this week because rocky was basically playing a lone hand for them (he is really good to watch) but it could matter much more against other teams.
I think Cotchin falls under the same category as I mentioned with Rockliff. A lot of his possessions are those little gets coming out of the defensive half, and he doesn't push forward with I50's as often as what his numbers (ave 26.4 disposals) show.
Rebound 50 - ave 2 per game
Inside 50 - ave 3 per game
Goald - 0.9 per game
So while he may get 40 touches, stats show that they aren't always going to be in damaging positions.
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
Sorry Dude wrote:bennymacca wrote:fair point, i agree with you.
but for instance, if this was richmond next week and we allowed cotchin or boomer to get 40, that could very well be the difference between a win and a loss. it wasnt this week because rocky was basically playing a lone hand for them (he is really good to watch) but it could matter much more against other teams.
I think Cotchin falls under the same category as I mentioned with Rockliff. A lot of his possessions are those little gets coming out of the defensive half, and he doesn't push forward with I50's as often as what his numbers (ave 26.4 disposals) show.
Rebound 50 - ave 2 per game
Inside 50 - ave 3 per game
Goald - 0.9 per game
So while he may get 40 touches, stats show that they aren't always going to be in damaging positions.
Was more just trying to pick out someone who can be damaging but in a better team. Change that to Martin if you want.
- Sorry Dude
- League - Top 5
- Posts: 2658
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 am
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
bennymacca wrote:Sorry Dude wrote:bennymacca wrote:fair point, i agree with you.
but for instance, if this was richmond next week and we allowed cotchin or boomer to get 40, that could very well be the difference between a win and a loss. it wasnt this week because rocky was basically playing a lone hand for them (he is really good to watch) but it could matter much more against other teams.
I think Cotchin falls under the same category as I mentioned with Rockliff. A lot of his possessions are those little gets coming out of the defensive half, and he doesn't push forward with I50's as often as what his numbers (ave 26.4 disposals) show.
Rebound 50 - ave 2 per game
Inside 50 - ave 3 per game
Goald - 0.9 per game
So while he may get 40 touches, stats show that they aren't always going to be in damaging positions.
Was more just trying to pick out someone who can be damaging but in a better team. Change that to Martin if you want.
I know what you mean (just keeping the conversation going
Then again, maybe Cotchin's numbers aren't what they usually are because he is getting that quality "run with" player in his hip pocket all day.
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
So how we gonna go this week?
I think in general we match up pretty well against the tigers, and despite their good form I think we should have a good win, but you can never be sure this season.
I think in general we match up pretty well against the tigers, and despite their good form I think we should have a good win, but you can never be sure this season.
-
Spargo
- Coach
- Posts: 17682
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Team: Sacred Heart OC
- Location: Getting out of Dodge
- Has thanked: 6417 times
- Been thanked: 5688 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
bennymacca wrote: I think we should have a good win, but you can never be sure this season.
Purched up on that fence again I see...
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot
Time to get moving…
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot
Time to get moving…
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
Spargo wrote:bennymacca wrote: I think we should have a good win, but you can never be sure this season.
Purched up on that fence again I see...
yeah good one.
hows that north melbourne top four prediction going?
- westcoastpanther
- Coach
- Posts: 5489
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:27 pm
- Team: South Adelaide
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Boston
- Location: Weipa
- Has thanked: 66 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Hi, My name is Ron 'Bluey' Dunn. Did you know I played in the 61 & 62 Tasman Premiership sides....
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
to be honest, i think saying 24 degrees is hot is a bit of a copout. it wasnt high 30s (which happens sometimes in pre season)
combined with a 6 day break it could have a bigger effect but i still dont think it will make too much of a difference.
if we dont get up for this game it goes without saying we dont deserve to play finals
combined with a 6 day break it could have a bigger effect but i still dont think it will make too much of a difference.
if we dont get up for this game it goes without saying we dont deserve to play finals
-
Spargo
- Coach
- Posts: 17682
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
- Team: Glenelg
- Team: North Melbourne
- Team: Sacred Heart OC
- Location: Getting out of Dodge
- Has thanked: 6417 times
- Been thanked: 5688 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
Still a chance beleive it or not.
I think we can do it if we win our last 3, but the bulldogs always give us trouble and might beat us. Our record in Tassie is ok so we should beat the crows down there - unless they play well & we don't then we might lose. Melbourne is our last game which I would put down as a certain win unless one of the seasons biggest upsets occurs & it could spell curtains for us.
I just don't know
I think we can do it if we win our last 3, but the bulldogs always give us trouble and might beat us. Our record in Tassie is ok so we should beat the crows down there - unless they play well & we don't then we might lose. Melbourne is our last game which I would put down as a certain win unless one of the seasons biggest upsets occurs & it could spell curtains for us.
I just don't know
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot
Time to get moving…
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot
Time to get moving…
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
Spargo wrote:Still a chance beleive it or not.
I think we can do it if we win our last 3, but the bulldogs always give us trouble and might beat us. Our record in Tassie is ok so we should beat the crows down there - unless they play well & we don't then we might lose. Melbourne is our last game which I would put down as a certain win unless one of the seasons biggest upsets occurs & it could spell curtains for us.
I just don't know
you have to win your last 3 (likely) but the power have to lose to gold coast and carlton but beat freo, and freo have to lose to brisbane, the power, and hawthorn.
it aint happening mate
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
what is funny is that the crows might not want to smash st kilda in the final round, because if they do that, they could jump above west coast and into 7th, and have to travel to north melbourne, but if they stay 8th they could play the power in the first round.
obviously a long way to go
obviously a long way to go
- Rik E Boy
- Coach
- Posts: 28710
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:55 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Geelong
- Location: The Switch
- Has thanked: 1795 times
- Been thanked: 1912 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
bennymacca wrote:So how we gonna go this week?
I think in general we match up pretty well against the tigers, and despite their good form I think we should have a good win, but you can never be sure this season.
I reckon you'll be flatter than a Sprite after playing two short in the heat. The Tigers have won their last six and have found some resilience that was missing for most of the year. The Tiges have won on the road this year and your home record isn't all that flash. Neither side will play four quarters and for me it's Tigers by a couple of goals.
regards,
REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Rik E Boy
- Coach
- Posts: 28710
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:55 am
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Geelong
- Location: The Switch
- Has thanked: 1795 times
- Been thanked: 1912 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
Booney wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
I thought Sando raised a good point, but the heat seemed to affect the Lions more than his side.
regards,
REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
-
Jim05
- Coach
- Posts: 49466
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Essendon
- Team: South Gawler
- Has thanked: 1136 times
- Been thanked: 4041 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
Booney wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
Perhaps the players just had longer spells off. Would be interesting to see stats of time players spend on the bench when coming off
- bennymacca
- Coach
- Posts: 15028
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Freeling
- Has thanked: 2253 times
- Been thanked: 1803 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
Booney wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
well pretty hard to make more interchanges when you have less options on the bench, given you usually see double and sometimes triple changes after goals etc.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
Rik E Boy wrote:Booney wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
I thought Sando raised a good point, but the heat seemed to affect the Lions more than his side.
regards,
REB
It did seem to impact more on the young Lions, but they were running around in circles chasing shadows much of the afternoon.
Perhaps the Gold Coast should ask the AFL for a "please explain" when they have to play in Tasmania in the middle of June?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
- Booney
- Coach
- Posts: 64118
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Team: Port Adelaide Power
- Location: Alberton proud
- Has thanked: 8796 times
- Been thanked: 12740 times
- Contact:
Re: Crows 2014
bennymacca wrote:Booney wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:Richmond played Friday night, us Sunday in hot conditions with two left after half time.
West Coast also had an extra days break when they got us.
Worried.....
Strangely I heard Adelaide had 31 of their 120 allowed interchanges left unused.
You'd think with only two on the bench and the "heat" Sando was whining about they would have used all 120 rotations.
well pretty hard to make more interchanges when you have less options on the bench, given you usually see double and sometimes triple changes after goals etc.
It's only 1 less option.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.
If you want to go far, go together.
If you want to go far, go together.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: mal and 192 guests
