Aus v Ind Test Series

Happy Endings · Post by **Happy Endings** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:29 pm

I reckon the perennial spineless tail will find a pair today and hang on for a draw

Happy Endings · Post by **Happy Endings** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:31 pm

locky801 wrote:Dont dive for the catch S Marsh

Been our worst fielder this series.

locky801 · Post by **locky801** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:33 pm

reckon that was heading down leg but we will take it

wristwatcher · Post by **wristwatcher** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:33 pm

Bloody Beauty

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:34 pm

Plumb!!

Keefy · Post by **Keefy** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:34 pm

locky801 wrote:reckon that was heading down leg but we will take it

I thought the same thing

Happy Endings · Post by **Happy Endings** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:34 pm

Bang!

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:37 pm

Keefy wrote:
locky801 wrote:reckon that was heading down leg but we will take it

I thought the same thing

It was but makes up for that howler earlier

wristwatcher · Post by **wristwatcher** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:40 pm

Jim05 wrote:
Keefy wrote:
locky801 wrote:reckon that was heading down leg but we will take it

I thought the same thing

It was but makes up for that howler earlier

It was out and given out. Even on revue it would have stayed out. It doesn't have to hit middle lads.

Should be an epic finish

locky801 · Post by **locky801** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:40 pm

Boon would have gobbled that one

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:45 pm

wristwatcher wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
Keefy wrote:
locky801 wrote:reckon that was heading down leg but we will take it

I thought the same thing

It was but makes up for that howler earlier

It was out and given out. Even on revue it would have stayed out. It doesn't have to hit middle lads.

Should be an epic finish

Would of only stayed out because the umpires call stands.
If they ump had given that not out it wouldnt of been overturned by review.
You shouldnt be given out to a ball nicking leg stump but happy to take it

locky801 · Post by **locky801** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:46 pm

Bolivar Treatment works over with the new ball Starc

wristwatcher · Post by **wristwatcher** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:47 pm

Mark Nickolas "I wouldn't have taken the new ball " :roll:

Good call muppet.

Perhaps it might have worked in local English D grade

wristwatcher · Post by **wristwatcher** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:49 pm

It was out and given out. Even on revue it would have stayed out. It doesn't have to hit middle lads.

Should be an epic finish[/quote]
Would of only stayed out because the umpires call stands.
If they ump had given that not out it wouldnt of been overturned by review.
You shouldnt be given out to a ball nicking leg stump but happy to take it[/quote]

But it was given out and it was more than nicking. I thought it was the correct decision

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:53 pm

wristwatcher wrote:Mark Nickolas "I wouldn't have taken the new ball "

Good call muppet.

Perhaps it might have worked in local English D grade

Im with Nicholas on this one.
Hazelwood had the old ball reversing nicely and looked the most damaging.
New ball doesnt always bring wickets, batsman enjoy the ball coming on to them and the new ball isnt doing much

locky801 · Post by **locky801** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:54 pm

Rubbish Starc, make the batsman play

mighty_tiger_79 · Post by **mighty_tiger_79** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:58 pm

The bowlers are rooted

6.3 overs left

they will only bowl 2.3 like in Melbourne

quit with 4 overs to go

locky801 · Post by **locky801** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:59 pm

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The bowlers are rooted

6.3 overs left

they will only bowl 2.3 like in Melbourne

quit with 4 overs to go

Better not

Post by **RustyCage** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 5:00 pm

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The bowlers are rooted

6.3 overs left

they will only bowl 2.3 like in Melbourne

quit with 4 overs to go

Disgraceful if we quit early

wristwatcher · Post by **wristwatcher** » Sat Jan 10, 2015 5:10 pm

Draw looks the only result now.

Rhino looks cooked and I don't rate Lyon good enough to get 3

Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Re: Aus v Ind Test Series

Who is online