heater31 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:
What criteria do we use then?
I say let's pick straws!
Bruce Reid retired years ago.
heater31 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:
What criteria do we use then?
I say let's pick straws!
Bombers4EVA wrote:I say in order to find talent or see who our next line of bowlers/batsman are. Give them a crack. Faulker isn't a dud and he's a proven cricketer in all forms. We can't keep picking blokes based on stats and their past results. And also hope that they will bat/bowl themselves back into form. That's when young talent gets lost. Time for the old timers to know when to stop and lets start giving blokes a crack. No matter what type of deck we are playing on. Stop with the excuses.
Jim05 wrote:Bombers4EVA wrote:I say in order to find talent or see who our next line of bowlers/batsman are. Give them a crack. Faulker isn't a dud and he's a proven cricketer in all forms. We can't keep picking blokes based on stats and their past results. And also hope that they will bat/bowl themselves back into form. That's when young talent gets lost. Time for the old timers to know when to stop and lets start giving blokes a crack. No matter what type of deck we are playing on. Stop with the excuses.
We have the rest of the shield season to look at potential players.
Rik E Boy wrote:Bombers4EVA wrote:Everyone has a right to an opinion on here as it is a forum where you can express your opinion on any matter. I believe that Faulkner deserves a crack and he looks like he can play cricket. He's better than some blokes we've given a shot to or are still hoping they find some form (Watson).
I don't think you can play Faulkner or Marsh ahead of Watson, at least away. Try that selection on home decks first.
regards,
REB
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 110 guests