dedja wrote:kickinit wrote:... Is this what you are resulting to now that I've proven (with actual facts) that you are wrong?
thought that would be your answer dedja, like I said the law doesn't lie.
by kickinit » Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:53 pm
dedja wrote:kickinit wrote:... Is this what you are resulting to now that I've proven (with actual facts) that you are wrong?
by dedja » Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:57 pm
by RB » Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:03 pm
kickinit wrote:RB wrote:I mean what did he do? Push him? If so where?
Grab him on the shoulder, forcing him to lose his balance.
by dedja » Fri Jan 23, 2015 10:59 pm
by kickinit » Sat Jan 24, 2015 12:01 am
RB wrote:kickinit wrote:RB wrote:I mean what did he do? Push him? If so where?
Grab him on the shoulder, forcing him to lose his balance.
And you're satisfied that this doesn't fit into subsection (2), despite the jury, who were present in court and witnessed the giving of evidence and cross-examination, returning a not guilty verdict, and the judge lambasting the trial as a waste of time and public money? Were both the judge and the 12-member jury on the take? Would love to know what goes through your head.
by kickinit » Sat Jan 24, 2015 12:02 am
dedja wrote:someone else's turn to rub the lamp ...
Hi mal
by dedja » Sat Jan 24, 2015 12:06 am
by wristwatcher » Sat Jan 24, 2015 10:51 am
by dedja » Sat Jan 24, 2015 10:56 am
by kickinit » Sat Jan 24, 2015 4:14 pm
dedja wrote:Poor form from the Advertiser today, haven't covered themselves in glory the past few days.
by cracka » Sat Jan 24, 2015 6:09 pm
wristwatcher wrote:After reading about only on here and hearing bits and pieces I decided to look into this one and get as much detail I could.
I too have come up with my verdict ; Yasser Shahin is a complete and utter flog sock. Not necessarily for his actions on the day as we all have the ability to crack the brace and bits. More so for the follow on trial and complete waste of time money and resources all seemingly for a mindf@ck on the poor bloke who appeared to be doing his job.
This is coming from someone who has had a cop lie in court to gain a traffic conviction on them (ironically just around the corner from the event albeit some 20 years ago) so I think I have some degree analytical ability in this one. I would still love to hear the actual audio recorded by both parties. The overall tone of the incident and subsequent case is the mr OTR reeks of a$$hole
by wristwatcher » Sat Jan 24, 2015 11:40 pm
cracka wrote:wristwatcher wrote:After reading about only on here and hearing bits and pieces I decided to look into this one and get as much detail I could.
I too have come up with my verdict ; Yasser Shahin is a complete and utter flog sock. Not necessarily for his actions on the day as we all have the ability to crack the brace and bits. More so for the follow on trial and complete waste of time money and resources all seemingly for a mindf@ck on the poor bloke who appeared to be doing his job.
This is coming from someone who has had a cop lie in court to gain a traffic conviction on them (ironically just around the corner from the event albeit some 20 years ago) so I think I have some degree analytical ability in this one. I would still love to hear the actual audio recorded by both parties. The overall tone of the incident and subsequent case is the mr OTR reeks of a$$hole
In the words of the great Dennis Denuto "Its the vibe"
by Psyber » Sun Jan 25, 2015 12:14 pm
wristwatcher wrote:After reading about only on here and hearing bits and pieces I decided to look into this one and get as much detail I could.
I too have come up with my verdict ; Yasser Shahin is a complete and utter flog sock. Not necessarily for his actions on the day as we all have the ability to crack the brace and bits. More so for the follow on trial and complete waste of time money and resources all seemingly for a mindf@ck on the poor bloke who appeared to be doing his job.
This is coming from someone who has had a cop lie in court to gain a traffic conviction on them (ironically just around the corner from the event albeit some 20 years ago) so I think I have some degree analytical ability in this one. I would still love to hear the actual audio recorded by both parties. The overall tone of the incident and subsequent case is the mr OTR reeks of a$$hole
by cracka » Sun Jan 25, 2015 12:44 pm
wristwatcher wrote:cracka wrote:wristwatcher wrote:After reading about only on here and hearing bits and pieces I decided to look into this one and get as much detail I could.
I too have come up with my verdict ; Yasser Shahin is a complete and utter flog sock. Not necessarily for his actions on the day as we all have the ability to crack the brace and bits. More so for the follow on trial and complete waste of time money and resources all seemingly for a mindf@ck on the poor bloke who appeared to be doing his job.
This is coming from someone who has had a cop lie in court to gain a traffic conviction on them (ironically just around the corner from the event albeit some 20 years ago) so I think I have some degree analytical ability in this one. I would still love to hear the actual audio recorded by both parties. The overall tone of the incident and subsequent case is the mr OTR reeks of a$$hole
In the words of the great Dennis Denuto "Its the vibe"
Do you mean Like Mabo?
by bennymacca » Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:24 pm
Psyber wrote:wristwatcher wrote:After reading about only on here and hearing bits and pieces I decided to look into this one and get as much detail I could.
I too have come up with my verdict ; Yasser Shahin is a complete and utter flog sock. Not necessarily for his actions on the day as we all have the ability to crack the brace and bits. More so for the follow on trial and complete waste of time money and resources all seemingly for a mindf@ck on the poor bloke who appeared to be doing his job.
This is coming from someone who has had a cop lie in court to gain a traffic conviction on them (ironically just around the corner from the event albeit some 20 years ago) so I think I have some degree analytical ability in this one. I would still love to hear the actual audio recorded by both parties. The overall tone of the incident and subsequent case is the mr OTR reeks of a$$hole
I've been pulled over by the cops a few times over the last 40 years for minor traffic offences and they have never been anything but civil to me.
But then I've never been anything but civil to them too.
Aggression breeds aggression...
I do agree, though, that the one time I went to court over a less minor traffic offence (1987) the version the police prosecutor presented to the court had been, shall we say, "oversimplified" a little and made it appear there had been a "chase" where there had not. My lawyer picked that up and the PP conceded there had been no "chase" when asked to be more specific. My lawyer made sure the details the police had left out were then stated clearly to establish context. (I was not convicted of "Speed Dangerous".)
by wristwatcher » Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:24 pm
bennymacca wrote:Psyber wrote:wristwatcher wrote:After reading about only on here and hearing bits and pieces I decided to look into this one and get as much detail I could.
I too have come up with my verdict ; Yasser Shahin is a complete and utter flog sock. Not necessarily for his actions on the day as we all have the ability to crack the brace and bits. More so for the follow on trial and complete waste of time money and resources all seemingly for a mindf@ck on the poor bloke who appeared to be doing his job.
This is coming from someone who has had a cop lie in court to gain a traffic conviction on them (ironically just around the corner from the event albeit some 20 years ago) so I think I have some degree analytical ability in this one. I would still love to hear the actual audio recorded by both parties. The overall tone of the incident and subsequent case is the mr OTR reeks of a$$hole
I've been pulled over by the cops a few times over the last 40 years for minor traffic offences and they have never been anything but civil to me.
But then I've never been anything but civil to them too.
Aggression breeds aggression...
I do agree, though, that the one time I went to court over a less minor traffic offence (1987) the version the police prosecutor presented to the court had been, shall we say, "oversimplified" a little and made it appear there had been a "chase" where there had not. My lawyer picked that up and the PP conceded there had been no "chase" when asked to be more specific. My lawyer made sure the details the police had left out were then stated clearly to establish context. (I was not convicted of "Speed Dangerous".)
yep for sure. if you be a dick to the cops that is the quickest way for them to find things to book you for.
by Booney » Tue Jan 27, 2015 8:12 am
kickinit wrote:dedja wrote:What world are you from because it's not Earth
Please provide me with the evidence that supports your assertion that the police office has committed an offence, because the Westminster System doesn't seem to agree with you.
The officer made physical contact with him, which he admits in his voice recording. Below is what SA defines as assault.(1) A person commits an assault if the person, without the consent of another person (the "victim")—
(a) intentionally applies force (directly or indirectly) to the victim; or
(b) intentionally makes physical contact (directly or indirectly) with the victim, knowing that the victim might reasonably object to the contact in the circumstances (whether or not the victim was at the time aware of the contact); or
See B Dedja, under our law he committed assault. I'm guessing in your twisted brain you probably still think your right. I'm also guessing you think Nick stevens should of been found not guilty.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/sa/c ... 2/s20.html
by RustyCage » Tue Jan 27, 2015 10:46 am
by Failed Creation » Tue Jan 27, 2015 11:01 am
RustyCage wrote:Has anyone heard from Shahin since the court case? I'm worried for him. Hopefully he is seeking counselling to deal with the 'Nam like flashbacks he'd be having on a nightly basis of his brutal beating at the hands of the constabulary. He is Australia's own Rodney King, poor guy
by Booney » Tue Jan 27, 2015 11:09 am
RustyCage wrote:Has anyone heard from Shahin since the court case? I'm worried for him. Hopefully he is seeking counselling to deal with the 'Nam like flashbacks he'd be having on a nightly basis of his brutal beating at the hands of the constabulary. He is Australia's own Rodney King, poor guy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |