by dedja » Fri Jan 30, 2015 1:49 pm
by am Bays » Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:00 pm
dedja wrote:Hird's appeal has been dismissed and ordered to pay ASADA's costs
by Fricky » Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:15 pm
am Bays wrote:dedja wrote:Hird's appeal has been dismissed and ordered to pay ASADA's costs
Hi Ho, Hi Ho, it's off to the High Court we go......
by Hondo » Fri Jan 30, 2015 3:23 pm
dedja wrote:Hird's appeal has been dismissed and ordered to pay ASADA's costs
by MW » Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:12 pm
by Jim05 » Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:09 pm
MW wrote:Beyond a joke this club. Threatening boycotting games if they don't get penalties backdated to Sept 2014 (why???) is the last straw.
by dedja » Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:17 pm
by MW » Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:58 am
Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:Beyond a joke this club. Threatening boycotting games if they don't get penalties backdated to Sept 2014 (why???) is the last straw.
What a load of crap. Firstly it is the players not the club who are driving this boycott scenerio. Secondly ive explained why a few posts above but ill explain again for you. If players are found guilty any punishment is backdated to our last game which was the finals loss to North but if the players play NAB cup then that could become their last game and thats when the penalty starts. The players want a definitive answer on the rules and I believe they are meeting with ASADA on Wednesday to go over it. If the players cant get assurances that playing the NAB games wont harm or alter the penalty then they will not play in it
by Jim05 » Sat Jan 31, 2015 9:27 am
MW wrote:Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:Beyond a joke this club. Threatening boycotting games if they don't get penalties backdated to Sept 2014 (why???) is the last straw.
What a load of crap. Firstly it is the players not the club who are driving this boycott scenerio. Secondly ive explained why a few posts above but ill explain again for you. If players are found guilty any punishment is backdated to our last game which was the finals loss to North but if the players play NAB cup then that could become their last game and thats when the penalty starts. The players want a definitive answer on the rules and I believe they are meeting with ASADA on Wednesday to go over it. If the players cant get assurances that playing the NAB games wont harm or alter the penalty then they will not play in it
Firstly, if you think it's the players driving the boycott you are delusional
Secondly, it does not make sense to backdate a punishment to September when they have not been penalised since September. Have they been banned from pre-season training? Camps? The club? No.
It's a joke.
by dedja » Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:17 pm
Suri wrote:am Bays wrote:dedja wrote:Hird's appeal has been dismissed and ordered to pay ASADA's costs
Hi Ho, Hi Ho, it's off to the High Court we go......
Going on form, I would say Hird will have his appeal into the high court by the close of business today
by woodublieve12 » Sat Jan 31, 2015 2:31 pm
by Happy Endings » Sat Jan 31, 2015 5:49 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Jan 31, 2015 6:08 pm
Happy Endings wrote:So will teams just get a bye or forfeit win when they are scheduled to play the Dons this year
by Panther Pack » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:53 pm
by woodublieve12 » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:58 pm
Jim05 wrote:Happy Endings wrote:So will teams just get a bye or forfeit win when they are scheduled to play the Dons this year
No, have enough backup players
Depends on how long bans are, may only get a couple of weeks ban
by Jim05 » Tue Feb 03, 2015 2:25 pm
Panther Pack wrote:Surely if Essendon players are found guilty of taking illegal substances the board of the Essendon Football Club have no choice but to sack James Hird given he was Senior Coach at the time?
As Bomber Thompson has already been let go I would assume Mark Harvey would then be announced as the new coach of the Bombers.
by Jim05 » Tue Feb 03, 2015 2:34 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Happy Endings wrote:So will teams just get a bye or forfeit win when they are scheduled to play the Dons this year
No, have enough backup players
Depends on how long bans are, may only get a couple of weeks ban
that would be a disgrace...
Back dating it is a joke too.
by cracka » Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:32 pm
Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Happy Endings wrote:So will teams just get a bye or forfeit win when they are scheduled to play the Dons this year
No, have enough backup players
Depends on how long bans are, may only get a couple of weeks ban
that would be a disgrace...
Back dating it is a joke too.
Essendon doesnt make the rules, sportsmen all around the world have been given back dated penalties.
Way too early to predict IMO, depending which media person you listen to the ban ranged from zero weeks to 6 months
by westcoastpanther » Wed Feb 04, 2015 9:41 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |