Wedgie wrote:Hodges incident worse than Lewis? I officially have no idea about anything.
You,me and 99% of the football world mate.
i dunno - using elbows means it is immediately an intentional conduct thing. thats different to being extremely late and careless in a spoil
Hodge, IMO, probably meant to get Swallow in the chest area, he just threw it too high. If Hodge had got him in the chest, like we see dozens of times a game, maybe a free kick at most.
Lewis, IMO, was late, with a swinging arm, high, to a player eyes on the ball, much worse.
Wedgie wrote:Hodges incident worse than Lewis? I officially have no idea about anything.
You,me and 99% of the football world mate.
i dunno - using elbows means it is immediately an intentional conduct thing. thats different to being extremely late and careless in a spoil
Hodge, IMO, probably meant to get Swallow in the chest area, he just threw it too high. If Hodge had got him in the chest, like we see dozens of times a game, maybe a free kick at most.
Lewis, IMO, was late, with a swinging arm, high, to a player eyes on the ball, much worse.
Hodge and Lewis, IMO are typical Hawthorn dogs who should have got life.
Wedgie wrote:Hodges incident worse than Lewis? I officially have no idea about anything.
You,me and 99% of the football world mate.
i dunno - using elbows means it is immediately an intentional conduct thing. thats different to being extremely late and careless in a spoil
Hodge, IMO, probably meant to get Swallow in the chest area, he just threw it too high. If Hodge had got him in the chest, like we see dozens of times a game, maybe a free kick at most.
Lewis, IMO, was late, with a swinging arm, high, to a player eyes on the ball, much worse.
Had to double check that post to make sure I hadon't posted it. Agree 100%
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Wedgie wrote:Hodges incident worse than Lewis? I officially have no idea about anything.
You,me and 99% of the football world mate.
i dunno - using elbows means it is immediately an intentional conduct thing. thats different to being extremely late and careless in a spoil
Hodge, IMO, probably meant to get Swallow in the chest area, he just threw it too high. If Hodge had got him in the chest, like we see dozens of times a game, maybe a free kick at most.
Lewis, IMO, was late, with a swinging arm, high, to a player eyes on the ball, much worse.
Hodge was also when the play had stopped, got to his feet and belted the poor bastard. Lewis intentional but at least he put up a piss weak attempt to hide it in a spoil......
IMHO and it might start people yelling at me but I don't think Steven May should've got anything but then ends up getting 3!
Tribunal has been pretty good this year. Until now, That decision baffles me. Yes it's unfortunat what happened to Rockcliff (and no one wants to see Players get injured) But it's a contact sport and that was just an unfortunate incident.
carey wrote:IMHO and it might start people yelling at me but I don't think Steven May should've got anything but then ends up getting 3!
Tribunal has been pretty good this year. Until now, That decision baffles me. Yes it's unfortunat what happened to Rockcliff (and no one wants to see Players get injured) But it's a contact sport and that was just an unfortunate incident.
Surely Gold Coast appeal that???
Totally agree, just a footy collision
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
carey wrote:IMHO and it might start people yelling at me but I don't think Steven May should've got anything but then ends up getting 3!
Tribunal has been pretty good this year. Until now, That decision baffles me. Yes it's unfortunat what happened to Rockcliff (and no one wants to see Players get injured) But it's a contact sport and that was just an unfortunate incident.
Surely Gold Coast appeal that???
Totally agree, just a footy collision
Yep just because someone gets injured doesn't mean that someone has to be reported.
For me the intention should be the number 1 factor taking into account when handing suspensions
Unfortunatly it's the damage caused that has become the major factor despite the fact there will ALWAYS be accidental collisions in aussie rules
carey wrote:IMHO and it might start people yelling at me but I don't think Steven May should've got anything but then ends up getting 3!
Tribunal has been pretty good this year. Until now, That decision baffles me. Yes it's unfortunat what happened to Rockcliff (and no one wants to see Players get injured) But it's a contact sport and that was just an unfortunate incident.
Surely Gold Coast appeal that???
Totally agree, just a footy collision
Yep just because someone gets injured doesn't mean that someone has to be reported.
For me the intention should be the number 1 factor taking into account when handing suspensions
Unfortunatly it's the damage caused that has become the major factor despite the fact there will ALWAYS be accidental collisions in aussie rules
I can't believe that got games, that hit didn't even look all that hard May was taller which caused the shoulder to hit the head, no intention to put him out just wanted to have body contact to get the ball, was there even a free kick given?
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
carey wrote:IMHO and it might start people yelling at me but I don't think Steven May should've got anything but then ends up getting 3!
Tribunal has been pretty good this year. Until now, That decision baffles me. Yes it's unfortunat what happened to Rockcliff (and no one wants to see Players get injured) But it's a contact sport and that was just an unfortunate incident.
Wedgie wrote:Hodges incident worse than Lewis? I officially have no idea about anything.
You,me and 99% of the football world mate.
i dunno - using elbows means it is immediately an intentional conduct thing. thats different to being extremely late and careless in a spoil
Hodge, IMO, probably meant to get Swallow in the chest area, he just threw it too high. If Hodge had got him in the chest, like we see dozens of times a game, maybe a free kick at most.
Lewis, IMO, was late, with a swinging arm, high, to a player eyes on the ball, much worse.
Lewis's one was so late that it was marked down in round 6.
carey wrote:IMHO and it might start people yelling at me but I don't think Steven May should've got anything but then ends up getting 3!
Tribunal has been pretty good this year. Until now, That decision baffles me. Yes it's unfortunat what happened to Rockcliff (and no one wants to see Players get injured) But it's a contact sport and that was just an unfortunate incident.
carey wrote:IMHO and it might start people yelling at me but I don't think Steven May should've got anything but then ends up getting 3!
Tribunal has been pretty good this year. Until now, That decision baffles me. Yes it's unfortunat what happened to Rockcliff (and no one wants to see Players get injured) But it's a contact sport and that was just an unfortunate incident.
Surely Gold Coast appeal that???
I'm with you on that one.
Now May has 3 weeks, what an absolute joke.
Agree with you but the precedent was set in regards to Fye, Jonas and even an incident by Hartlett a few years back. All were typicall bumps which got games.
The bump has been dead for a while now and anyone choosing to bump will be in striff if it goes slightly off.
Which in itself is more of a joke than tham anything I have seen in our great game.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
