Round 9 dribble

[carey]

What would be worse, supporting the Kangaroos or Richmond?

Kangeroos, As they should be much better than they dish up each week. No Ticker

[Booney]

What would be worse, supporting the Kangaroos or Richmond?

Kangeroos, As they should be much better than they dish up each week. No Ticker

You mean, there isn't a Shinboner spirit?

[Spargo]

What would be worse, supporting the Kangaroos or Richmond?

Kangeroos, As they should be much better than they dish up each week. No Ticker

You mean, there isn't a Shinboner spirit?

We've ditched it for "the creed"

[mighty_tiger_79]

What would be worse, supporting the Kangaroos or Richmond?

Kangeroos, As they should be much better than they dish up each week. No Ticker

Tigers - they generally always finish 9th, apart from the rare time that they sneak into the 8

how many Finals have the Tigers won in the last 30 yrs, let alone Flags.

[Booney]

What would be worse, supporting the Kangaroos or Richmond?

Kangeroos, As they should be much better than they dish up each week. No Ticker

You mean, there isn't a Shinboner spirit?

We've ditched it for "the creed"

About time. One is a myth, the other is a set of guidelines and ideals any football club anywhere in the country should aspire to.

[mighty_tiger_79]

like the 10 commandments?

[Booney]

like the 10 commandments?

Being a myth? Yes, exactly.

[JK]

What would be worse, supporting the Kangaroos or Richmond?

Richmond. The Kangas have won two flags since the Tigers last landed one.

This weekend just gone doesnt help the argument though

[Booney]

What would be worse, supporting the Kangaroos or Richmond?

Richmond. The Kangas have won two flags since the Tigers last landed one.

This weekend just gone doesnt help the argument though

I missed the first half of yesterday's game on yard duties, I came in to watch the second half and thought the half time scoreboard might have been a typo.

Waite? Nahas? It's very Richmond like recruiting....

[MatteeG]

Agreed LM, ridiculous odds for Port considering their recent run, I'll be tipping Melbourne 5-10 goals.

Can't really see Port winning many more games this year, got a good chance to steal a win in a couple weeks against the Blues, but even that's a 50/50.

Reckon Crows are a fair chance of knocking off Freo at home to, Freo are due to drop one surely.

Back on board now HOF?

[JK]

What would be worse, supporting the Kangaroos or Richmond?

Richmond. The Kangas have won two flags since the Tigers last landed one.

This weekend just gone doesnt help the argument though

I missed the first half of yesterday's game on yard duties, I came in to watch the second half and thought the half time scoreboard might have been a typo.

Waite? Nahas? It's very Richmond like recruiting....

I would excuse Nahas, he at least looked dangerous. North just simply lack leaders in a crisis, same issue as 2013. Goldstein and Ziebell tried their hardest as did young Dumont, but the mistakes from experienced blokes like Gibson and Thompson (Tarrant made a crucial one) were sheer killers. Petrie had a crack at standing up, but probably should have assumed more responsibility on one play by kicking for goal rather than handing off to Gibson who missed (a shot that he shouldn't have).

Now, Lindsay Thomas is the interesting one and Im torn on my thoughts about him.

The Good: He kicks some incredibly difficult and important goals, and as a dangerous forward he should probably have a license to attempt to score at every opportunity.

The Bad: His instinct is to nearly always go at goal, even in extremely low percentage situations and whist he might kick 1 in 5 of them, the other 4 can be very costly because he has overlooked open teammates - Higgins was in excellent position a few times yesterday (and is pretty good himself near goal) but Thomas would have none of it.

[Q.]

I think we're overlooking the fact that Collingwood are just heaps good.

[carey]

I think we're overlooking the fact that Collingwood are just heaps good.

At what?

[JK]

I think we're overlooking the fact that Collingwood are just heaps good.

Haha .. It's a fair point to add that Collingwood were very good, very committed and much cleaner in the big moments. But they should have been further down at halftime, the Roos should have been able to stem the 3rd quarter bleeding much quicker, and the Roos also missed very gettable set shots in the final quarter that Collingwood didn't.

Full credit to Collingwood, but North supporters and most neutral football supporters would feel that;s a game the Roo's threw away.

[Spargo]

Threw, tossed, pissed away.....

[Q.]

I think we're overlooking the fact that Collingwood are just heaps good.

At what?

At everything

[westcoastpanther]

I think we're overlooking the fact that Collingwood are just heaps good.

At what?

At everything

Better than your preseason assessment of Crisp anyway.....

[Q.]

I think we're overlooking the fact that Collingwood are just heaps good.

At what?

At everything

Better than your preseason assessment of Crisp anyway.....

Have to admit, he has obliterated my expectations.

[Rik E Boy]

I think we're overlooking the fact that Collingwood are just heaps good.

Nah, you lost to Geelong by 41 points and we are horseshit.

regards,

REB

[Q.]

I think we're overlooking the fact that Collingwood are just heaps good.

Nah, you lost to Geelong by 41 points and we are horseshit.

regards,

REB

We're heaps good now. We were shit back then.