by PhilH » Sun Jun 14, 2015 9:39 pm
by therisingblues » Sun Jun 14, 2015 9:49 pm
by Booney » Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:19 am
PhilH wrote:Well they didn't use them because according to your coach (note the quotation marks) they were "too small".
Again what word would you replace "rejected" with?
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:21 am
by goddy11 » Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:30 am
by heater31 » Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:40 am
goddy11 wrote:The SANFL should be renamed the PANFL. They want everything their way. The rooms were too small. I've heard everything. Richmond oval used since 1956. Have the magpies suddenly realized the small change rooms.
by Pseudo » Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:42 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Semantics, Booney. You're arguing semantics.
It is a fuss over nothing, you're right.
But so is the PAFC deciding the rooms were too small.
by Wedgie » Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:54 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dutchy » Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:31 pm
RustyCage wrote:
It's completely a non issue. The change rooms weren't "rejected" as the headline states, just the amount of people around the playing group at the half time break meant the rooms would be cramped, so they decided to stay on the ground. Used a part of the ground that wasn't used by mini league or kick and a catch.
by Booney » Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:49 pm
Dutchy wrote:RustyCage wrote:
It's completely a non issue. The change rooms weren't "rejected" as the headline states, just the amount of people around the playing group at the half time break meant the rooms would be cramped, so they decided to stay on the ground. Used a part of the ground that wasn't used by mini league or kick and a catch.
Thats unusual, when Ive been to Richmond this year the middle is used for mini league and the north/south ends are both used for kids to have a kick and catch, so where were they?
by therisingblues » Mon Jun 15, 2015 1:57 pm
by Booney » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:00 pm
therisingblues wrote:So, they had to move to make way for the half time huddle? Yes, or no?
Simple really.
by wild dog » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:00 pm
Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:RustyCage wrote:
It's completely a non issue. The change rooms weren't "rejected" as the headline states, just the amount of people around the playing group at the half time break meant the rooms would be cramped, so they decided to stay on the ground. Used a part of the ground that wasn't used by mini league or kick and a catch.
Thats unusual, when Ive been to Richmond this year the middle is used for mini league and the north/south ends are both used for kids to have a kick and catch, so where were they?
Where the mini-league and kick'n'catch wasn't. Simples really.
by Pseudo » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:01 pm
Dutchy wrote:RustyCage wrote:
It's completely a non issue. The change rooms weren't "rejected" as the headline states, just the amount of people around the playing group at the half time break meant the rooms would be cramped, so they decided to stay on the ground. Used a part of the ground that wasn't used by mini league or kick and a catch.
Thats unusual, when Ive been to Richmond this year the middle is used for mini league and the north/south ends are both used for kids to have a kick and catch, so where were they?
by Booney » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:01 pm
Pseudo wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Semantics, Booney. You're arguing semantics.
It is a fuss over nothing, you're right.
But so is the PAFC deciding the rooms were too small.
No, the smears were well within their rights to fold their arms and pout over this. None of the other 17 AFL clubs has to leave their manicurist, reiki worker, fluffers and other essential staff in the players race; it's just not acceptable, dammit!
by therisingblues » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:08 pm
Booney wrote:therisingblues wrote:So, they had to move to make way for the half time huddle? Yes, or no?
Simple really.
No, none of the half time activities of the kids or people kickin'n'catchin were impacted upon.
by Booney » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:14 pm
therisingblues wrote:Booney wrote:therisingblues wrote:So, they had to move to make way for the half time huddle? Yes, or no?
Simple really.
No, none of the half time activities of the kids or people kickin'n'catchin were impacted upon.
I've read a couple of comments to the contrary already.
What makes you an authority on half time activities at Richmond?
by Booney » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:16 pm
therisingblues wrote:Booney wrote:therisingblues wrote:So, they had to move to make way for the half time huddle? Yes, or no?
Simple really.
No, none of the half time activities of the kids or people kickin'n'catchin were impacted upon.
I've read a couple of comments to the contrary already.
What makes you an authority on half time activities at Richmond?
by therisingblues » Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:20 pm
Dutchy wrote:
Thats unusual, when Ive been to Richmond this year the middle is used for mini league and the north/south ends are both used for kids to have a kick and catch, so where were they?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |