by am Bays » Fri Jun 26, 2015 3:05 pm
by fisho mcspaz » Sun Jun 28, 2015 7:06 pm
by Booney » Thu Jul 02, 2015 8:47 am
by heater31 » Thu Jul 02, 2015 8:59 am
Booney wrote:A conversation I've just had with a customer this morning.He's got about the thickest Scottish accent I've ever encountered.
I'm pretty sure he's just been saying vowels at me"Aaaa","Aye", "Oooo", "Uuuu", "Eh?"
Can I buy a consonant? [emoji38]
by bennymacca » Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:20 am
by Booney » Thu Jul 02, 2015 4:03 pm
by nuggety goodness » Fri Jul 03, 2015 9:24 am
by bennymacca » Fri Jul 03, 2015 10:44 am
by cennals05 » Fri Jul 03, 2015 11:12 am
nuggety goodness wrote:Had a laugh with a friend last night about the whole gay marriage stuff (lets not get started with that)
The thought was why not create a new act that gives all the same rights as marriage but have it specifically for LGBT people (considering they have distinguished themselves i dont see this as an issue). If that happened then there wpuld also need to be a new name for it and he came out with something that isnt worth repeating but theb it dawned on me, they can get Garried... quite simple really...
His name is Garry. He hated it!
by HH3 » Fri Jul 03, 2015 11:29 am
by nuggety goodness » Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:00 pm
cennals05 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:Had a laugh with a friend last night about the whole gay marriage stuff (lets not get started with that)
The thought was why not create a new act that gives all the same rights as marriage but have it specifically for LGBT people (considering they have distinguished themselves i dont see this as an issue). If that happened then there wpuld also need to be a new name for it and he came out with something that isnt worth repeating but theb it dawned on me, they can get Garried... quite simple really...
His name is Garry. He hated it!
I am failing to see how they have distinguished themselves.
by Booney » Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:15 pm
by cennals05 » Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:17 pm
nuggety goodness wrote:cennals05 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:Had a laugh with a friend last night about the whole gay marriage stuff (lets not get started with that)
The thought was why not create a new act that gives all the same rights as marriage but have it specifically for LGBT people (considering they have distinguished themselves i dont see this as an issue). If that happened then there wpuld also need to be a new name for it and he came out with something that isnt worth repeating but theb it dawned on me, they can get Garried... quite simple really...
His name is Garry. He hated it!
I am failing to see how they have distinguished themselves.
I did want to avoid this so let's not huh... i was just laughing at a mate...
However, titling themselves as 'LGBT community' distinguishes them from those that are not, does it not?
by nuggety goodness » Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:19 pm
cennals05 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:cennals05 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:Had a laugh with a friend last night about the whole gay marriage stuff (lets not get started with that)
The thought was why not create a new act that gives all the same rights as marriage but have it specifically for LGBT people (considering they have distinguished themselves i dont see this as an issue). If that happened then there wpuld also need to be a new name for it and he came out with something that isnt worth repeating but theb it dawned on me, they can get Garried... quite simple really...
His name is Garry. He hated it!
I am failing to see how they have distinguished themselves.
I did want to avoid this so let's not huh... i was just laughing at a mate...
However, titling themselves as 'LGBT community' distinguishes them from those that are not, does it not?
That means lots of people are distinguishing themselves. The disabled community, the Greek Community, the African Community and I could go on. Do we change what we call marriage for them because they have 'distinguished' themselves from others. Everyone belongs to some kind of community that distinguishes themselves from others.
What a stupid and flawed argument.
by cennals05 » Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:27 pm
nuggety goodness wrote:
But they arent asking for laws to be changed to accommodate their minority 'community'
by nuggety goodness » Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:32 pm
by HH3 » Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:36 pm
nuggety goodness wrote:So a choice of being gay is the same as being a slave or not recognised as even human....... ok..... that fits in this thread.
by nuggety goodness » Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:37 pm
HH3 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:So a choice of being gay is the same as being a slave or not recognised as even human....... ok..... that fits in this thread.
Its not a choice champion. Are your sexual preferences choices? Or do you just like what you like?
by HH3 » Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:40 pm
nuggety goodness wrote:HH3 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:So a choice of being gay is the same as being a slave or not recognised as even human....... ok..... that fits in this thread.
Its not a choice champion. Are your sexual preferences choices? Or do you just like what you like?
So if someone is sexually attracted to children or animals is it a choice or were they born that way?
by Q. » Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:41 pm
nuggety goodness wrote:HH3 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:So a choice of being gay is the same as being a slave or not recognised as even human....... ok..... that fits in this thread.
Its not a choice champion. Are your sexual preferences choices? Or do you just like what you like?
So if someone is sexually attracted to children or animals is it a choice or were they born that way?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |