by Footy Chick » Thu Aug 06, 2015 11:28 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Look Good In Leather » Fri Aug 07, 2015 1:58 am
Footy Chick wrote:Sorry...thats my fault, there was a post above that which we had to delete. Unfortunately we cant discuss specifics until further notice.
by Ian » Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:45 am
Look Good In Leather wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Sorry...thats my fault, there was a post above that which we had to delete. Unfortunately we cant discuss specifics until further notice.
Why?
by jo172 » Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:05 am
swingman wrote:jo172 wrote:Ugh, never much fun.
Could get ugly given their payment system
What's their payment system ? I can't see the hawks being relegated I think they will do enough to stay up. It would t be fair on the div 2 clubs if the hawks were relegated would it.
by wristwatcher » Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:11 am
jo172 wrote:swingman wrote:jo172 wrote:Ugh, never much fun.
Could get ugly given their payment system
What's their payment system ? I can't see the hawks being relegated I think they will do enough to stay up. It would t be fair on the div 2 clubs if the hawks were relegated would it.
My understanding of Salisbury North is rather than giving a bloke an envelope full of $50 notes each Saturday Night they tally up the games a player plays each season, make deductions for a player failing to train, get back to the club on Saturday nights and support club functions and pay as a lump sum at the end of the year.
Pretty good system if you can budget and manage it appropriately.
As for unfair on the Division 2 Clubs, meh, it's hardly without precedent (also in the Salisbury area). Also, for what it's worth the gap between the top of Div 2 and the bottom half of Div 1 is not what it was even five years ago. Salisbury North would (a lot of water to go under the bridge) be a good Division 2 club, but given at least one of Modbury, Gaza and Unley will still be there will not run rampant.
by Footy Chick » Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:14 am
Look Good In Leather wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Sorry...thats my fault, there was a post above that which we had to delete. Unfortunately we cant discuss specifics until further notice.
Why?
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Failed Creation » Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:15 am
Footy Chick wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Sorry...thats my fault, there was a post above that which we had to delete. Unfortunately we cant discuss specifics until further notice.
Why?
Because I effing said so. Thats why
Police investigating.
We can discuss it once;
a) if charges are laid
B) or it hits the paper
This site cant afford the court costs...
by wristwatcher » Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:22 am
Failed Creation wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Sorry...thats my fault, there was a post above that which we had to delete. Unfortunately we cant discuss specifics until further notice.
Why?
Because I effing said so. Thats why
Police investigating.
We can discuss it once;
a) if charges are laid
B) or it hits the paper
This site cant afford the court costs...
Fair call.
It's not without precedent on the forum either, is it?
by Footy Chick » Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:31 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Look Good In Leather » Fri Aug 07, 2015 10:04 am
Footy Chick wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Sorry...thats my fault, there was a post above that which we had to delete. Unfortunately we cant discuss specifics until further notice.
Why?
Because I effing said so. Thats why
Police investigating.
We can discuss it once;
a) if charges are laid
B) or it hits the paper
This site cant afford the court costs...
by Footy Chick » Fri Aug 07, 2015 10:07 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by marbles » Fri Aug 07, 2015 10:21 am
by piccachu » Mon Aug 10, 2015 12:16 pm
by jo172 » Mon Aug 10, 2015 12:18 pm
by marbles » Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:12 pm
by wristwatcher » Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:41 pm
marbles wrote:Or the best players are back to front 5 to 1 baby 1 in 5
by barry_watson » Tue Aug 11, 2015 5:18 pm
by wristwatcher » Tue Aug 11, 2015 5:26 pm
barry_watson wrote:piccachu wrote:Milne BOG for PNU and Clinton 2nd best for SN, did they not go near each other all day?
Anyone that watched that game shed any light, baffles me that 2 blokes going head to head in the ruck can both have such an influence on the game?
Clinton absolutely destroyed Milne and that was the key to them beating PNU so easily.
by Blackwhite » Tue Aug 11, 2015 5:39 pm
barry_watson wrote:piccachu wrote:Milne BOG for PNU and Clinton 2nd best for SN, did they not go near each other all day?
Anyone that watched that game shed any light, baffles me that 2 blokes going head to head in the ruck can both have such an influence on the game?
Clinton absolutely destroyed Milne and that was the key to them beating PNU so easily.
by footys the winner » Tue Aug 11, 2015 10:25 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |