by RB » Mon Feb 08, 2016 5:03 pm
by Grahaml » Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:33 am
by stan » Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:08 am
by Booney » Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:08 am
Grahaml wrote:Hope Port aren't spending so much energy on this as the chat here might suggest. Essendon as a club were punished severely and repeatedly and deservedly so. Any suggestion they aren't getting punished because the AFL are allowing them to put 22 on the park each week is nonsense. If Port were to need a top up player from outside their list, outside the AFL and a bloke not good enough to get a game at Melbourne, Carlton or Essendon then they've got bigger problems to worry about.
by whufc » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:47 am
Booney wrote:Grahaml wrote:Hope Port aren't spending so much energy on this as the chat here might suggest. Essendon as a club were punished severely and repeatedly and deservedly so. Any suggestion they aren't getting punished because the AFL are allowing them to put 22 on the park each week is nonsense. If Port were to need a top up player from outside their list, outside the AFL and a bloke not good enough to get a game at Melbourne, Carlton or Essendon then they've got bigger problems to worry about.
Best we not talk about it if it upsets you then.
Anywho, it wasn't a matter of wanting to poach a top end player as a replacement, it was the principle of Essendon having more players available to them on their list than Port Adelaide have. Nothing more.
While I agree we'd only have either elevated a rookie or perhaps have drawn from the stocks at the Magpies, it would still have been a full senior and rookie list we would have had to choose from.
by carey » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:50 am
by whufc » Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:12 am
carey wrote:That's right WHUFC we don't take drugs we just deal them........
by Q. » Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:15 am
carey wrote:That's right WHUFC we don't take drugs we just deal them........
by carey » Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:21 am
Q. wrote:carey wrote:That's right WHUFC we don't take drugs we just deal them........
Actually, I did hear that six players received a strike very recently.
by valleys07 » Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:43 am
Q. wrote:carey wrote:That's right WHUFC we don't take drugs we just deal them........
Actually, I did hear that six players received a strike very recently.
by Q. » Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:45 am
valleys07 wrote:Q. wrote:carey wrote:That's right WHUFC we don't take drugs we just deal them........
Actually, I did hear that six players received a strike very recently.
Just Port, Q?
by UK Fan » Tue Feb 09, 2016 1:32 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Booney » Tue Feb 09, 2016 2:07 pm
by stan » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:45 pm
UK Fan wrote:Its so unfair Essendon have an extra international rookie on their list where Port doesnt.
Obviously this international rookie will give Essendon a massive advantage over the power this season.
Just when you thought PAFC Couldnt get more pathetic.
by Booney » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:50 pm
stan wrote:UK Fan wrote:Its so unfair Essendon have an extra international rookie on their list where Port doesnt.
Obviously this international rookie will give Essendon a massive advantage over the power this season.
Just when you thought PAFC Couldnt get more pathetic.
Lol whos the international rookie at Essendon might I ask?
by UK Fan » Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:28 pm
stan wrote:UK Fan wrote:Its so unfair Essendon have an extra international rookie on their list where Port doesnt.
Obviously this international rookie will give Essendon a massive advantage over the power this season.
Just when you thought PAFC Couldnt get more pathetic.
Lol whos the international rookie at Essendon might I ask?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by bennymacca » Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:05 pm
by Ruben Carter » Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:35 pm
bennymacca wrote:The crows have two category b rookies, Hugh Goddard and Alex Keath.
Not sure what your point is though. Actually I do, it's to troll.
by stan » Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:53 pm
UK Fan wrote:stan wrote:UK Fan wrote:Its so unfair Essendon have an extra international rookie on their list where Port doesnt.
Obviously this international rookie will give Essendon a massive advantage over the power this season.
Just when you thought PAFC Couldnt get more pathetic.
Lol whos the international rookie at Essendon might I ask?
http://www.essendonfc.com.au/player-pro ... or-mckenna
The Gaelic footballer, from Tyrone in Northern Ireland, signed with the club as a category B rookie
How else do you think Essendon have 45 players on their list when the maximum allowed is 44.
by stan » Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:55 pm
Booney wrote:stan wrote:UK Fan wrote:Its so unfair Essendon have an extra international rookie on their list where Port doesnt.
Obviously this international rookie will give Essendon a massive advantage over the power this season.
Just when you thought PAFC Couldnt get more pathetic.
Lol whos the international rookie at Essendon might I ask?
Better off discussing it with someone who has a clue, stanley.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |