by Footy Chick » Mon Feb 29, 2016 3:11 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Bombers4EVA » Mon Feb 29, 2016 3:14 pm
by jo172 » Mon Feb 29, 2016 3:18 pm
Footy Chick wrote:So you stop clogging the new D7 thread with C grade crap!
by Executive Member » Mon Feb 29, 2016 3:27 pm
Bombers4EVA wrote:When will C1,C2,C3,etc... draw be finalised?
by old farmer » Mon Feb 29, 2016 3:35 pm
by Executive Member » Tue Mar 01, 2016 8:57 am
old farmer wrote:good job considering the end of div 8 and juggling those teams into the 6 C Grade comps.
I would have thought Pultney would be higher than 6, Smashed everyone bar Modbury last year and Smithfield (C4) would be the obvious swap with them as there is no way they are gunna have a team of sandbaggers like Pultney. And the D Grade comp gets called C5 whilst a C Grade comp gets C6, minor I know but makes sense.
But well done and happy with our draw and plenty of triple headers.....
by old farmer » Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:27 am
Executive Member wrote:old farmer wrote:good job considering the end of div 8 and juggling those teams into the 6 C Grade comps.
I would have thought Pultney would be higher than 6, Smashed everyone bar Modbury last year and Smithfield (C4) would be the obvious swap with them as there is no way they are gunna have a team of sandbaggers like Pultney. And the D Grade comp gets called C5 whilst a C Grade comp gets C6, minor I know but makes sense.
But well done and happy with our draw and plenty of triple headers.....
Looks like you got half your suggestion up, Pulteney and Seaton have swapped in C6/C4
by Executive Member » Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:28 am
old farmer wrote:Executive Member wrote:old farmer wrote:good job considering the end of div 8 and juggling those teams into the 6 C Grade comps.
I would have thought Pultney would be higher than 6, Smashed everyone bar Modbury last year and Smithfield (C4) would be the obvious swap with them as there is no way they are gunna have a team of sandbaggers like Pultney. And the D Grade comp gets called C5 whilst a C Grade comp gets C6, minor I know but makes sense.
But well done and happy with our draw and plenty of triple headers.....
Looks like you got half your suggestion up, Pulteney and Seaton have swapped in C6/C4
Happy about that, as would your boys EM.
by Sass! » Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:56 am
by zedman » Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:16 am
by TEX07 » Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:11 pm
by Inallseriousness » Tue Mar 01, 2016 1:23 pm
by Pag » Tue Mar 01, 2016 2:12 pm
Inallseriousness wrote:According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area
by jo172 » Tue Mar 01, 2016 2:15 pm
Pag wrote:Inallseriousness wrote:According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area
This doesn't surprise me one bit.
by Inallseriousness » Tue Mar 01, 2016 2:54 pm
jo172 wrote:Pag wrote:Inallseriousness wrote:According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area
This doesn't surprise me one bit.
Putting to one side the Under 18s (largely fuelled by testosterone and coaches who can't see the wood from the trees) I'd be a bit surprised if there were more reports in C Grades than in A/B Grades purely because of a reluctance for club umpires to go through the process. What I would expect is due to the relative wild west of C Grades that when these reports lead to findings of guilt there are more extreme penalties.
I suspect the accurate statement is that there are far more weeks of suspension in the C Grade comps relative to the A/B Grade comps
by zedman » Tue Mar 01, 2016 3:02 pm
Inallseriousness wrote:jo172 wrote:Pag wrote:Inallseriousness wrote:According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area
This doesn't surprise me one bit.
Putting to one side the Under 18s (largely fuelled by testosterone and coaches who can't see the wood from the trees) I'd be a bit surprised if there were more reports in C Grades than in A/B Grades purely because of a reluctance for club umpires to go through the process. What I would expect is due to the relative wild west of C Grades that when these reports lead to findings of guilt there are more extreme penalties.
I suspect the accurate statement is that there are far more weeks of suspension in the C Grade comps relative to the A/B Grade comps
Definitely more games, I thought the stat put up at the coaches forum last night said both but I may be wrong...it was a long night
by Trader » Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:41 am
Inallseriousness wrote:According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area
by The Bedge » Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:47 am
Trader wrote:Well 2015 certainly went against that trend...
D8, 8R, C1-C4 - 8 Reports, 8 Guilty, 30 Weeks, ave 3.75.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Trader » Wed Mar 02, 2016 4:19 pm
by Fricky » Sun Jun 05, 2016 3:09 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |