by Footy Chick » Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:45 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by The Bedge » Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:58 am
Footy Chick wrote:A Member Club may refuse a transfer for a player if three (3) players have previously transferred from such Member Club to the same destination Member Club in the current season except where both Member Clubs agree.
(a) A player who has previously played 25 or more matches for the Member Club applying for such transfer is exempt for the purposes of this Clause.
In short, if a club has already taken three players from the Para Hills Football Club, 12.26 will be applied.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by human_torpedo » Fri Apr 01, 2016 12:42 pm
by The Bedge » Fri Apr 01, 2016 12:43 pm
human_torpedo wrote:Bit nervous all your poaching may not come to fruition big Z?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by human_torpedo » Fri Apr 01, 2016 12:45 pm
Zartan wrote:human_torpedo wrote:Bit nervous all your poaching may not come to fruition big Z?
You call it poaching, I call it acquisitioning
by Arch44 » Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:41 pm
by Arch44 » Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:41 pm
by The Big Shrek » Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:34 pm
by Trader » Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:35 pm
Footy Chick wrote:The League will be assuming control of the distribution of the remaining Para Hills Football Club players via Rule 12.26
by wonder_kid » Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:11 pm
by The Big Shrek » Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:16 pm
Trader wrote:Footy Chick wrote:The League will be assuming control of the distribution of the remaining Para Hills Football Club players via Rule 12.26
by Q. » Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:29 pm
by The Bedge » Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:44 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Trader wrote:Footy Chick wrote:The League will be assuming control of the distribution of the remaining Para Hills Football Club players via Rule 12.26
Where in the rules does it say league = member club.
The rule is designed to stop clubs being decimated. Once the club has collapsed there is no place for the application of the rule. The league would be abusing its power of it refused clearances in this situation.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:45 pm
Q. wrote:I doubt the league is going to stop some B-Grader from playing with his mates simply to enforce the rule.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Trader » Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:58 pm
by Q. » Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:03 pm
Zartan wrote:Q. wrote:I doubt the league is going to stop some B-Grader from playing with his mates simply to enforce the rule.
Nope you would be wrong, the question was put to the league today and the response was 'prioritise the 3 you want'..
by Kahuna » Fri Apr 01, 2016 5:51 pm
by Footy Chick » Fri Apr 01, 2016 6:31 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by the joker » Fri Apr 01, 2016 8:31 pm
by Bigshow82 » Fri Apr 01, 2016 9:18 pm
Trader wrote:Only natural for the leauge to try and distribute those players. If 20 rock up at the same club that club will all but be assured a B-grade flag.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |