by valleys07 » Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:57 pm
by stan » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:06 pm
valleys07 wrote:Uncontested Possession- 247 to 164 Adelaide's way
Uncontested Marks- 95-31 Adelaide's way.
I didn't watch the game, but christ that doesn't read well for our workrate.
by Booney » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:22 pm
stan wrote:Interesting after the wash up looking at the stats. Lobbe matched Jacobs in terms of hit outs to advantage which is interesting as well as the contested ball and clearances.
Jacobs 41 - 8 to advantage
Lobbe 38 - 7 to advantage
From that you would say Lobbe held his own. Jacobs is no mug and one of the best in the comp, so I would suggest it was a fair improvement form Lobbe this week and hence he was not your issue. Also you guys one your share of contested ball and clearances. Smashed in un contested possesions as we saw the crows had so much space. Obviously the issue others have eluded to about the press.
Another interesting fact, inside 50's: Port 70 Crows 55. Staggering really, your delivery was terrible to your forwards.
by CoverKing » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:26 pm
by Booney » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:31 pm
CoverKing wrote:Pass backs do not count as an inside 50
by stan » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:32 pm
Booney wrote:stan wrote:Interesting after the wash up looking at the stats. Lobbe matched Jacobs in terms of hit outs to advantage which is interesting as well as the contested ball and clearances.
Jacobs 41 - 8 to advantage
Lobbe 38 - 7 to advantage
From that you would say Lobbe held his own. Jacobs is no mug and one of the best in the comp, so I would suggest it was a fair improvement form Lobbe this week and hence he was not your issue. Also you guys one your share of contested ball and clearances. Smashed in un contested possesions as we saw the crows had so much space. Obviously the issue others have eluded to about the press.
Another interesting fact, inside 50's: Port 70 Crows 55. Staggering really, your delivery was terrible to your forwards.
Ergo me telling Wubbsy to piss off when he asked "Is Dixon playing this week?".
Clearly didn't watch the game, none of the forwards had any chance to work with the delivery they were given.
I'd like ( am I really asking this? ) another stat, Inside 25, clubs get lots of shallow entries into the F50 that just cross the arc and I think the modern game would reflect a sides attacking power better by tracking how many times they get within 25 of goal.
Also, I'd like "pass backs" where defensive players take the ball into the others sides F50 to not count as a F50 entry. Adelaide used the fat side to their advantage on the weekend and I'd say 5 or more of Ports I50's would have been Adelaide switching and taking it into the F50 for Port with no Port player in sight.
by Booney » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:38 pm
by bennymacca » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:43 pm
Booney wrote:Ergo me telling Wubbsy to piss off when he asked "Is Dixon playing this week?".
Clearly didn't watch the game, none of the forwards had any chance to work with the delivery they were given.
by Booney » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:45 pm
bennymacca wrote:Booney wrote:Ergo me telling Wubbsy to piss off when he asked "Is Dixon playing this week?".
Clearly didn't watch the game, none of the forwards had any chance to work with the delivery they were given.
From what i saw none of them (except young) were really working that hard either though. Seemed to be a lot more kicking into stationary targets, which allowed Lever and Hartigan to drift in and take easy intercept marks.
I probably didnt watch the game as closely as some given i was on the hill and it was party mode after about half time, but I dont remember it being a skill issue for the power, more a ball movement issue in that it wasnt quick enough, so it allowed the Crows to create the extra man at most contests.
by Dutchy » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:54 pm
by Booney » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:56 pm
Dutchy wrote:Advetisers 2 standouts in the SANFL yesterday - Mitchell & Butcher!
Guess we will see if Dixon is going to be the recruit Port hoped for in the next few weeks, people seem to forget he has only played 60 games of AFL, and wouldn't be used to the scrutiny of a football mad town and media....going to be intriguing.
by The Bedge » Mon Apr 04, 2016 2:57 pm
Dutchy wrote:Guess we will see if Dixon is going to be the recruit Port hoped for in the next few weeks, people seem to forget he has only played 60 games of AFL, and wouldn't be used to the scrutiny of a football mad town and media....going to be intriguing.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by woodublieve12 » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:00 pm
by valleys07 » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:02 pm
Zartan wrote:Dutchy wrote:Guess we will see if Dixon is going to be the recruit Port hoped for in the next few weeks, people seem to forget he has only played 60 games of AFL, and wouldn't be used to the scrutiny of a football mad town and media....going to be intriguing.
I think he could be.. but Port seem to expect miracles of him - poor delivery, just bomb it on his head and hope he's going to pluck contested mark after contested mark.. Would like to see Port look to go through Westhoff a bit more, stop being so one dimensional.
by valleys07 » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:03 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Not sure if it's been mentioned, so forgive me if it has. I am a big Hinkley fan, but if the next few weeks are shockers (which I doubt they will be) will he be under the pump?
by Jim05 » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:08 pm
valleys07 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Not sure if it's been mentioned, so forgive me if it has. I am a big Hinkley fan, but if the next few weeks are shockers (which I doubt they will be) will he be under the pump?
The media will begin their circus if we get done by Essendon, make no mistake.
by valleys07 » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:17 pm
Jim05 wrote:valleys07 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Not sure if it's been mentioned, so forgive me if it has. I am a big Hinkley fan, but if the next few weeks are shockers (which I doubt they will be) will he be under the pump?
The media will begin their circus if we get done by Essendon, make no mistake.
He will be safe then.
I'm going there Friday night fully expecting us to cop a 100 point hiding. If we give Port 70 inside 50's or whatever they had against the Crows we will concede 35-40 goals[emoji20]
Port are the best front running side in the comp, if they get on top early it will be a long night
by The Bedge » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:27 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Booney » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:29 pm
by The Bedge » Mon Apr 04, 2016 3:30 pm
Booney wrote:I don't think we need to go down that path at this point.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |