Round 4 discussion

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:44 pm

Never ever give up. I'm not buying that bullshit anymore Talk is cheap. ******* livid .

mighty_tiger_79 · Post by **mighty_tiger_79** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:46 pm

At least you have China on your side

Corona Man · Post by **Corona Man** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:47 pm

Good chance to catch up on all kinds of odd jobs by the sounds of it

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:48 pm

Corona Man wrote:Good chance to catch up on all kinds of odd jobs by the sounds of it

I do have a pile of stubbies that need emptying.

daysofourlives · Post by **daysofourlives** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:49 pm

Yes we Ken
Time he took the blame, players are clearly not playing for him anymore. It happens when you show blind faith in the same guys every week and they dont feel the heat for their spots in the team and on the other side of the coin perhaps the guys in the reserves dont feel they get opportunities when they deserve it.

Has to take sole responsibility for recruiting Dixon, clearly doesnt fit in with the rest of the group or fits in too well and is a bad influence.

mighty_tiger_79 · Post by **mighty_tiger_79** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:49 pm

Corona Man wrote:Good chance to catch up on all kinds of odd jobs by the sounds of it

And I'm supposed to be out in the garden, this is far too entertaining

mighty_tiger_79 · Post by **mighty_tiger_79** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:51 pm

Best half of footy ever for the Giants

Go you good things

Corona Man · Post by **Corona Man** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:52 pm

Booney wrote:
Corona Man wrote:Good chance to catch up on all kinds of odd jobs by the sounds of it

I do have a pile of stubbies that need emptying.

Your blokes are better than what they are dishing up here Boon... But how can anyone out of the team at present push up to the seniors when they have an effin bye?

jakovasaurus · Post by **jakovasaurus** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:52 pm

game of the round.

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:54 pm

daysofourlives wrote:Yes we Ken
Time he took the blame, players are clearly not playing for him anymore. It happens when you show blind faith in the same guys every week and they dont feel the heat for their spots in the team and on the other side of the coin perhaps the guys in the reserves dont feel they get opportunities when they deserve it.

Has to take sole responsibility for recruiting Dixon, clearly doesnt fit in with the rest of the group or fits in too well and is a bad influence.

I'll cop criticism of Hinkley with no issues at all. This is deloprable.

What you know about Dixons career 4 games in is as much as the test of us, very little and you can't make that call.

whufc · Post by **whufc** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:56 pm

Booney wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:Yes we Ken
Time he took the blame, players are clearly not playing for him anymore. It happens when you show blind faith in the same guys every week and they dont feel the heat for their spots in the team and on the other side of the coin perhaps the guys in the reserves dont feel they get opportunities when they deserve it.

Has to take sole responsibility for recruiting Dixon, clearly doesnt fit in with the rest of the group or fits in too well and is a bad influence.

I'll cop criticism of Hinkley with no issues at all. This is deloprable.

What you know about Dixons career 4 games in is as much as the test of us, very little and you can't make that call.

You can tell alot about a blokes character when times are tough and Dixon is a spoilt brat!!

marbles · Post by **marbles** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:59 pm

daysofourlives wrote:Yes we Ken
Time he took the blame, players are clearly not playing for him anymore. It happens when you show blind faith in the same guys every week and they dont feel the heat for their spots in the team and on the other side of the coin perhaps the guys in the reserves dont feel they get opportunities when they deserve it.

Has to take sole responsibility for recruiting Dixon, clearly doesnt fit in with the rest of the group or fits in too well and is a bad influence.

So true dayzy

Also think the introduction of voss into the dynamics has altered the alpha male and the fiesty ranga that never backs down has caused hinkley to be over shadowed behind closed doors to a point that hinkleys spirit is compromised. He's still doing his job but i think its voss whos stepping on peoples toes and the boys dont want him around.... theyre not playing for 'voss'.... its voss that has to go just my observations but sadly hinkley will sink first because of it. He is best to walk away asap to protect his own reputation i doubt assistant coaches would be sacked mid year?

am Bays · Post by **am Bays** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 2:00 pm

Ian Downsborough > Charlie Dixon

Discuss...

daysofourlives · Post by **daysofourlives** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 2:02 pm

Booney wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:Yes we Ken
Time he took the blame, players are clearly not playing for him anymore. It happens when you show blind faith in the same guys every week and they dont feel the heat for their spots in the team and on the other side of the coin perhaps the guys in the reserves dont feel they get opportunities when they deserve it.

Has to take sole responsibility for recruiting Dixon, clearly doesnt fit in with the rest of the group or fits in too well and is a bad influence.

I'll cop criticism of Hinkley with no issues at all. This is deloprable.

What you know about Dixons career 4 games in is as much as the test of us, very little and you can't make that call.

I think there is more than 4 games evidence to look at mate, Rocket Eade wasnt that disappointed to lose him, Suns going Ok without him.
So next week we will see the standard reaction from Hinkley, Toumpas, Ahchee, Amon and Neade will be dropped, Mitchell and co will come in, you will get the same result and in 2 weeks times those players will swap again. Its time to put the fear through the whole group, Hartlett, Ebert and Lobbe need to be dropped as well as Dixon

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 2:08 pm

Booney wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:Yes we Ken
Time he took the blame, players are clearly not playing for him anymore. It happens when you show blind faith in the same guys every week and they dont feel the heat for their spots in the team and on the other side of the coin perhaps the guys in the reserves dont feel they get opportunities when they deserve it.

Has to take sole responsibility for recruiting Dixon, clearly doesnt fit in with the rest of the group or fits in too well and is a bad influence.

I'll cop criticism of Hinkley with no issues at all. This is deloprable.

What you know about Dixons career 4 games in is as much as the test of us, very little and you can't make that call.

Come on Boon, the Suns couldn't wait to ship out cancers like Dixon and Bennell. Has talent but just way too much baggage

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 2:08 pm

9 players with 4 touches or less at half time for Port!

Booney · Post by **Booney** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 2:09 pm

They'll feed us some honesty session bullshit on Monday.

You want a ******* honesty session? Open it up to the members that cough up their hard earned and put their emotions on the line for the club. ******* pathetic.

marbles · Post by **marbles** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 2:11 pm

Jim05 wrote:
Booney wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:Yes we Ken
Time he took the blame, players are clearly not playing for him anymore. It happens when you show blind faith in the same guys every week and they dont feel the heat for their spots in the team and on the other side of the coin perhaps the guys in the reserves dont feel they get opportunities when they deserve it.

Has to take sole responsibility for recruiting Dixon, clearly doesnt fit in with the rest of the group or fits in too well and is a bad influence.

I'll cop criticism of Hinkley with no issues at all. This is deloprable.

What you know about Dixons career 4 games in is as much as the test of us, very little and you can't make that call.

Come on Boon, the Suns couldn't wait to ship out cancers like Dixon and Bennell. Has talent but just way too much baggage

Trengrove is the biggest sub-standard performer of them all

I wouldnt be too harsh on dixon, he is just the icing on the cake. He'd look good if the cake wasnt piss poor

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 2:12 pm

daysofourlives wrote:
Booney wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:Yes we Ken
Time he took the blame, players are clearly not playing for him anymore. It happens when you show blind faith in the same guys every week and they dont feel the heat for their spots in the team and on the other side of the coin perhaps the guys in the reserves dont feel they get opportunities when they deserve it.

Has to take sole responsibility for recruiting Dixon, clearly doesnt fit in with the rest of the group or fits in too well and is a bad influence.

I'll cop criticism of Hinkley with no issues at all. This is deloprable.

What you know about Dixons career 4 games in is as much as the test of us, very little and you can't make that call.

I think there is more than 4 games evidence to look at mate, Rocket Eade wasnt that disappointed to lose him, Suns going Ok without him.
So next week we will see the standard reaction from Hinkley, Toumpas, Ahchee, Amon and Neade will be dropped, Mitchell and co will come in, you will get the same result and in 2 weeks times those players will swap again. Its time to put the fear through the whole group, Hartlett, Ebert and Lobbe need to be dropped as well as Dixon

Agree Daisy.
Seems the same players at Port cop the heat each week and it's just a revolving door between 5-6 players. Really needs to make a statement and drop a big name.
Hartlett is VC and meant to be a leader, has moped around all day and couldn't give a stuff, send him back to the Maggies with Lobbe, Dixon and a couple others

daysofourlives · Post by **daysofourlives** » Sun Apr 17, 2016 2:18 pm

Wonder if Valleys will be too "busy" for a review this week

Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Re: Round 4 discussion

Who is online