by AFL-SA » Sat Apr 23, 2016 12:12 am
by matt35 » Sat Apr 23, 2016 9:08 am
by Harry the Horse » Sat Apr 23, 2016 9:23 am
by UK Fan » Sat Apr 23, 2016 10:28 am
DOC wrote:Hazydog wrote:Effectively saying there is a group of club directors who have met to discuss concerns. Whatever they feel the best course of action is will need to be ratified by the Commission. Interesting that Rooch discounts the Crows placing a team in the Amateur League due to lack of infrastructure. Would have been nice if some decision makers and the media had the common sense to realise that when they voted, rather than consider it as a genuine option up the Crows sleeve.
And the discussion has started that they, the commission, need to go. They came in for the AFL liscence which evolved to liscences, they have gone so why still have them. Its not like they do it for free.
8 team comp, 21 rounds final four. Any takers?
AFL-SA wrote:There will be no changes, the AFL-SA Commission is 100% behind the AFL sides, period.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by stan » Sat Apr 23, 2016 11:49 am
AFL-SA wrote:There will be no changes, the AFL-SA Commission is 100% behind the AFL sides, period.
by AFL-SA » Sat Apr 23, 2016 12:12 pm
UK Fan wrote:The commission has no say in the expulsion or addition of teams into the SANFL.
Purely the league directors as per the SANFL constitution
by twosheds » Sat Apr 23, 2016 12:16 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Apr 23, 2016 12:37 pm
AFL-SA wrote:UK Fan wrote:The commission has no say in the expulsion or addition of teams into the SANFL.
Purely the league directors as per the SANFL constitution
Then clearly you have NFI how football is run in this state. Most clubs are broke and rely on AFL-SA to survive, which effectively gives them absolute power.
Look at the fixtures and out of bounds rules this year, is that the will of the clubs?
Bend over and just accept the reaming, it's not going to stop anytime soon.
by saintal » Sat Apr 23, 2016 12:39 pm
AFL-SA wrote:There will be no changes, the AFL-SA Commission is 100% behind the AFL sides, period.
by Reddeer » Sat Apr 23, 2016 1:44 pm
saintal wrote:AFL-SA wrote:There will be no changes, the AFL-SA Commission is 100% behind the AFL sides, period.
Is that you David (Burtenshaw)? If so, welcome back
by UK Fan » Sat Apr 23, 2016 4:21 pm
AFL-SA wrote:UK Fan wrote:The commission has no say in the expulsion or addition of teams into the SANFL.
Purely the league directors as per the SANFL constitution
Then clearly you have NFI how football is run in this state. Most clubs are broke and rely on AFL-SA to survive, which effectively gives them absolute power.
Look at the fixtures and out of bounds rules this year, is that the will of the clubs?
Bend over and just accept the reaming, it's not going to stop anytime soon.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by RB » Sat Apr 23, 2016 4:38 pm
matt35 wrote:Agree. There were similar rumours and stories discussed on here during last season. Will come to nothing, as it should.
by AFL-SA » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:25 pm
UK Fan wrote:AFL-SA wrote:UK Fan wrote:The commission has no say in the expulsion or addition of teams into the SANFL.
Purely the league directors as per the SANFL constitution
Then clearly you have NFI how football is run in this state. Most clubs are broke and rely on AFL-SA to survive, which effectively gives them absolute power.
Look at the fixtures and out of bounds rules this year, is that the will of the clubs?
Bend over and just accept the reaming, it's not going to stop anytime soon.
What by referring to the constitution the league is run by ??? How stupid of me.
The only reason SANFL invented afl clubs and gave you our market was so you could make us money.
Go and cry about the umpiring last night and duck off.
by JK » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:36 pm
AFL-SA wrote: Unless this changes, sore arses all around.
by johntheclaret » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:59 pm
JK wrote:AFL-SA wrote: Unless this changes, sore arses all around.
Now you might finally be speaking from experience (NTTAWWT)
by saintal » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:08 pm
by UK Fan » Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:30 pm
AFL-SA wrote:UK Fan wrote:AFL-SA wrote:UK Fan wrote:The commission has no say in the expulsion or addition of teams into the SANFL.
Purely the league directors as per the SANFL constitution
Then clearly you have NFI how football is run in this state. Most clubs are broke and rely on AFL-SA to survive, which effectively gives them absolute power.
Look at the fixtures and out of bounds rules this year, is that the will of the clubs?
Bend over and just accept the reaming, it's not going to stop anytime soon.
What by referring to the constitution the league is run by ??? How stupid of me.
The only reason SANFL invented afl clubs and gave you our market was so you could make us money.
Go and cry about the umpiring last night and duck off.
The Directors are too scared to take on AFL-SA, regardless of the constitution, because AFL-SA hold the financial keys to their survival. Unless this changes, sore arses all around.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Magellan » Sat Apr 23, 2016 9:11 pm
johntheclaret wrote:What does NTTAWWT mean. I'm assuming Woodvill West Torrens come into it somewhere
by Pseudo » Sun Apr 24, 2016 5:17 pm
by RB » Sun Apr 24, 2016 5:19 pm
Pseudo wrote:When the ABC was televising the league they always broadcast the ANZAC day GF rematch, and IIRC did this on top of the regular weekend coverage.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |