by Gingin » Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:45 pm
by carey » Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:56 pm
Gingin wrote:Final margin was 59 points, Salisbury blew a 15pt lead at half time. From the beginning the Salisbury players were in for a physical game hoping to soften up the PAOC players and stop their running game, Jessen hitting a bloke from behind, who laid on the ground for some time and had to leave the field 80m from the contest just a start. The umpires did have more involvement in the last half but only after they Salisbury team dropped their heads and discipline and started to go for the blokes or made general poor decisions. IMO PAOC out classed them and ran all over them as they were far fitter which proved superior over muscle. Bloke in the B Grade for Salisbury may have cost the club a few premiership points too for abusing the umpire and getting a straight red card.
by The Big Shrek » Mon Apr 25, 2016 11:15 pm
by Gingin » Mon Apr 25, 2016 11:37 pm
by Trader » Tue Apr 26, 2016 12:22 am
Gingin wrote:Jessen hitting a bloke from behind, who laid on the ground for some time and had to leave the field 80m from the contest.
The Big Shrek wrote:I didn't see the Jessen incident only saw the bloke on the ground after. No doubt there will be a lot of eyes on him from now on. With SN on their bond he'd have to be very silly to do anything. Those at league HQ won't hesitate to rub him out/take points. Was impressed that Thomas laid a solid bump on him straight after.
carey wrote:The Jessen thing at half back was nothing, happened directly in front of me and was milked for everything it was worth.
by Footy Chick » Tue Apr 26, 2016 12:07 pm
The Big Shrek wrote: The chat at the oval was that the bond only counts for physical incidents though so SN might be alright.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by The Big Shrek » Tue Apr 26, 2016 12:49 pm
Footy Chick wrote:The Big Shrek wrote: The chat at the oval was that the bond only counts for physical incidents though so SN might be alright.
Nope, also includes off field behavior and umpire abuse from spectators, officials or players.
by Cash 123 » Tue Apr 26, 2016 1:05 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Footy Chick wrote:The Big Shrek wrote: The chat at the oval was that the bond only counts for physical incidents though so SN might be alright.
Nope, also includes off field behavior and umpire abuse from spectators, officials or players.
Called the ump an f***ing cheat. Not sure what that's worth? I would have thought one game was enough.
by Old_mate21 » Tue Apr 26, 2016 2:32 pm
by jo172 » Tue Apr 26, 2016 2:42 pm
Old_mate21 wrote:He is probably on the money though if he is calling the umpire a cheat.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Tue Apr 26, 2016 3:06 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Footy Chick wrote:The Big Shrek wrote: The chat at the oval was that the bond only counts for physical incidents though so SN might be alright.
Nope, also includes off field behavior and umpire abuse from spectators, officials or players.
Called the ump an f***ing cheat. Not sure what that's worth? I would have thought one game was enough.
by Old_mate21 » Tue Apr 26, 2016 3:19 pm
by The Big Shrek » Tue Apr 26, 2016 3:57 pm
by Footy Chick » Tue Apr 26, 2016 4:11 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by The Big Shrek » Tue Apr 26, 2016 4:18 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Affirmative, I've heard the same.
by Footy Chick » Tue Apr 26, 2016 4:44 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Affirmative, I've heard the same.
Probably from the same person.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by The Bedge » Tue Apr 26, 2016 4:47 pm
Footy Chick wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Affirmative, I've heard the same.
Probably from the same person.
doubt it, I don't hang out with your kind
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Footy Chick » Tue Apr 26, 2016 4:49 pm
Zartan wrote:Footy Chick wrote:The Big Shrek wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Affirmative, I've heard the same.
Probably from the same person.
doubt it, I don't hang out with your kind
tight arses?
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Gingin » Tue Apr 26, 2016 7:27 pm
by The Big Shrek » Tue Apr 26, 2016 9:38 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |