by robranisgod » Wed May 25, 2016 9:59 am
by Magellan » Wed May 25, 2016 10:21 am
Doddy wrote:Saturday evening news on Channel 7. The slide comes up behind Soders with the Centrals vs Crows score. His comments on the game?
"Brad Crouch got 36 touches when the Crows state league side lost to Centrals today" (or very similar). One sentence, no further comment.
Thank God Channel 7 are doing it for SA Footy hey?
by Pseudo » Fri May 27, 2016 9:39 pm
by Wedgie » Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:05 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by heater31 » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:16 am
Wedgie wrote:Got to love the quality work the Advertiser does. RIP North Adelaide.IMAG0014_1.jpg
by Wedgie » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:29 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by therisingblues » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:57 am
Wedgie wrote:Warren Partland:
"NORWOOD'S nightmare injury toll as become even uglier after the 59-point loss to Woodville-West Torrens at Woodville on Saturday".
Besides the word "as" incorrectly used instead of "has" his margin conflicts with the score next to article:
Eagles 16.13 109
Norwood 6.8 44
(65 points)
The Eagles goal kickers on the same page adds up to 12 goals even though the Eagles kicked 16.
Do they have an editor?(or at least someone that can add up?)
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:06 am
by johntheclaret » Tue Jun 07, 2016 9:44 am
Wedgie wrote:Warren Partland:
"NORWOOD'S nightmare injury toll as become even uglier after the 59-point loss to Woodville-West Torrens at Woodville on Saturday".
Besides the word "as" incorrectly used instead of "has" his margin conflicts with the score next to article:
Eagles 16.13 109
Norwood 6.8 44
(65 points)
The Eagles goal kickers on the same page adds up to 12 goals even though the Eagles kicked 16.
Do they have an editor?(or at least someone that can add up?)
by Reddeer » Tue Jun 07, 2016 6:23 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Wedgie wrote:Warren Partland:
"NORWOOD'S nightmare injury toll as become even uglier after the 59-point loss to Woodville-West Torrens at Woodville on Saturday".
Besides the word "as" incorrectly used instead of "has" his margin conflicts with the score next to article:
Eagles 16.13 109
Norwood 6.8 44
(65 points)
The Eagles goal kickers on the same page adds up to 12 goals even though the Eagles kicked 16.
Do they have an editor?(or at least someone that can add up?)
That is just shocking.
by Reddeer » Tue Jun 07, 2016 6:23 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Wedgie wrote:Warren Partland:
"NORWOOD'S nightmare injury toll as become even uglier after the 59-point loss to Woodville-West Torrens at Woodville on Saturday".
Besides the word "as" incorrectly used instead of "has" his margin conflicts with the score next to article:
Eagles 16.13 109
Norwood 6.8 44
(65 points)
The Eagles goal kickers on the same page adds up to 12 goals even though the Eagles kicked 16.
Do they have an editor?(or at least someone that can add up?)
That is just shocking.
by Reddeer » Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:48 am
by holden78 » Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:16 pm
by johntheclaret » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:21 am
by johntheclaret » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:33 am
Ian wrote:This weeks SANFL ladder, for those of you who can't understand why North supporters aren't happy with the season, 6 wins from 121 games isn't real flash. BTW, South or the Eagles games don't add up either.
by Pseudo » Wed Jun 15, 2016 11:15 am
johntheclaret wrote:Ian wrote:This weeks SANFL ladder, for those of you who can't understand why North supporters aren't happy with the season, 6 wins from 121 games isn't real flash. BTW, South or the Eagles games don't add up either.
The fact Glenelg are top 11 and 1 tells you how wrong that table must be
by Wedgie » Wed Jun 15, 2016 11:19 am
Pseudo wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Ian wrote:This weeks SANFL ladder, for those of you who can't understand why North supporters aren't happy with the season, 6 wins from 121 games isn't real flash. BTW, South or the Eagles games don't add up either.
The fact Glenelg are top 11 and 1 tells you how wrong that table must be
This week's budget had the head-to-head record between Bays and Norf as 122-94 Glenelg's way, with two draws.
Forever chasing us, Roosters!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by am Bays » Wed Jun 15, 2016 11:23 am
Wedgie wrote:That's cool, if they want to swap the head to head figure around they can also swap the Finals and Grand Finals figure around.
The only stadium that you guys had a winning record against us was Footy Park, thank Christ it's being demolished!
by Wedgie » Wed Jun 15, 2016 11:25 am
am Bays wrote:Wedgie wrote:That's cool, if they want to swap the head to head figure around they can also swap the Finals and Grand Finals figure around.
The only stadium that you guys had a winning record against us was Footy Park, thank Christ it's being demolished!
Prospect Oval is a stadium?????
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by RB » Wed Jun 15, 2016 2:07 pm
Wedgie wrote:Pseudo wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Ian wrote:This weeks SANFL ladder, for those of you who can't understand why North supporters aren't happy with the season, 6 wins from 121 games isn't real flash. BTW, South or the Eagles games don't add up either.
The fact Glenelg are top 11 and 1 tells you how wrong that table must be
This week's budget had the head-to-head record between Bays and Norf as 122-94 Glenelg's way, with two draws.
Forever chasing us, Roosters!
That's cool, if they want to swap the head to head figure around they can also swap the Finals and Grand Finals figure around.
The only stadium that you guys had a winning record against us was Footy Park, thank Christ it's being demolished!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |