by reppoh_eht » Wed Sep 07, 2016 2:36 pm
by Oldman Munga » Wed Sep 07, 2016 2:38 pm
tigerpie wrote:Dutchy wrote:Feom SFL Facebook, so what was the outcome?
A post has been deleted about a tribunal decision last night. We cannot discuss any tribunal decision in an open forum. Multiple clubs have been in contact with the SFL President today. Comments can be made through your clubs. Please be aware that if you weren't at the tribunal hearing last night you don't know what evidence was presented and what influenced the decision. I wasn't at the tribunal and don't know what the commissioners were given either.
by Oldman Munga » Wed Sep 07, 2016 2:48 pm
Oldman Munga wrote:tigerpie wrote:Dutchy wrote:Feom SFL Facebook, so what was the outcome?
A post has been deleted about a tribunal decision last night. We cannot discuss any tribunal decision in an open forum. Multiple clubs have been in contact with the SFL President today. Comments can be made through your clubs. Please be aware that if you weren't at the tribunal hearing last night you don't know what evidence was presented and what influenced the decision. I wasn't at the tribunal and don't know what the commissioners were given either.
So we aren't allowed to know how many games he got?
Why can't we discuss the penalty?
Strange, unless its a criminal case.
by Luke15 » Wed Sep 07, 2016 2:49 pm
Oldman Munga wrote:tigerpie wrote:Dutchy wrote:Feom SFL Facebook, so what was the outcome?
A post has been deleted about a tribunal decision last night. We cannot discuss any tribunal decision in an open forum. Multiple clubs have been in contact with the SFL President today. Comments can be made through your clubs. Please be aware that if you weren't at the tribunal hearing last night you don't know what evidence was presented and what influenced the decision. I wasn't at the tribunal and don't know what the commissioners were given either.
So we aren't allowed to know how many games he got?
Why can't we discuss the penalty?
Strange, unless its a criminal case.[/quote
by waterguy01 » Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:34 pm
zooman07 wrote:Thumbs Up wrote:Luke15 wrote:Red Devil wrote:Let's not forget the Shoes runner spending half the game on the field and getting physically involved in the tussle late in the game! That is not on and very poorly umpired, runners/water boys or any officials should not physically touch players from the opposition!
He should be the one missing the rest of the year!!!
The Shoes runner is a serial offender at staying on the ground too long but you know what if you can get away.with it and the umpires arent smart enough to pick up on it then good luck to you.
But grabbing a.player is totally and utterly unacceptable and he should be at the very least spoken too by the SFL.
When did a RUNNER last win a game of football off his own boot?
Don't know bout you guys but don't you go to the footy to watch the game not the runner!!
Called through after Father's Day lunch and as a spectator the game looked to be played at a very good standard albeit reynella looked very slow and no where near as hard at the footy as the $hoes..Is this the end of G.P or will the Dogga hang round to show him the way like he has in the last 4 or 5 years and lead this ageing list out of the quagmire...Time to regenerate I think.Brighton and $hoes get the job done this week..!
by Boof » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:14 pm
by RFC 2010 » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:18 pm
by beer tent » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:34 pm
RFC 2010 wrote:Correct.
2 games for a broken jaw seems about right
by tigerpie » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:46 pm
by Animus » Wed Sep 07, 2016 5:38 pm
by strike me pink » Wed Sep 07, 2016 5:46 pm
Animus wrote:This weeks games:
Prelim Final #1 : Flagstaff Hill vs Noarlunga @ Porties - Potentially a great game of footy, Shoes in a close one for me
Prelim Final #2: Brighton vs Morphett Vale @ Noarlunga - Emus to send the Bombers packing their rolled up jean shorts to the Ammos.
by Boof » Wed Sep 07, 2016 5:58 pm
tigerpie wrote:Surely they aren't going to appeal.
OK appeal,lose and give him an extra 4 games for being an ungrateful pack of ferals.
2 games for intentionally elbowing a player in the head is woeful SFL!
by Oldman Munga » Wed Sep 07, 2016 6:25 pm
by tigerpie » Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:25 pm
Oldman Munga wrote:Interesting there's no mention of Moreens stitches and fractured eye socket on here
Reynella supporters can wear what ever colours they want , it's the ones on the paddock that count
by Dutchy » Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:40 pm
by Boof » Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:51 pm
Dutchy wrote:Who was the Reynella playing on the receiving end?
by pantherman » Wed Sep 07, 2016 8:03 pm
by Down the Hill » Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:14 pm
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:22 pm
Down the Hill wrote:Hey Dutchy, King and 85WAGY - at least all this talk on the "other topic" has taken our petty C grade bickering off the front page.
by RFC 2010 » Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:28 pm
pantherman wrote:Didn't see the incident, so no more than an interested observer. It seems that there are two very different stories going around. 1 a football collision and 1 a fairly unsavoury elbow - well off the ball. These are 2 very different things. Surely if we strip away emotion and club v club hatred some common sense needs to come to the fore and a little truth be reported. Maybe yet another finals loss to Shoes has a fairly disappointed Reynella clutching At straws and letting emotion get in the way of the facts.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |