tipper wrote:just voted. its up to 70% think that the sanfl would be better without them. watch the poll be quickly swept under the carpet when the advertiser offices open this morning
Or Mark Riccuito is given the casting vote.
by Magellan » Thu Sep 08, 2016 9:36 am
tipper wrote:just voted. its up to 70% think that the sanfl would be better without them. watch the poll be quickly swept under the carpet when the advertiser offices open this morning
by goddy11 » Thu Sep 08, 2016 9:43 am
tipper wrote:Dogs72 wrote:goddy11 wrote:this is a dodgey poll. you can vote as many times as you like.
Keep voting! I just voted for my 10 family members. Up to 67%.
dont suggest that to him. Goddy11 is an adelaide crows stooge and is in favour of ******* up the league
by tipper » Thu Sep 08, 2016 9:49 am
goddy11 wrote:tipper wrote:Dogs72 wrote:goddy11 wrote:this is a dodgey poll. you can vote as many times as you like.
Keep voting! I just voted for my 10 family members. Up to 67%.
dont suggest that to him. Goddy11 is an adelaide crows stooge and is in favour of ******* up the league
Don't presume I am an Crows stooge. WWT is my SANFL side always. AFC is my AFL side always. No middle ground. I don't like the AFL sides in. Terrible to see our players playing against us. Just saying the Advertiser poll is open manipulation and it looks like it has been.
by Magellan » Thu Sep 08, 2016 9:51 am
goddy11 wrote:tipper wrote:Dogs72 wrote:goddy11 wrote:this is a dodgey poll. you can vote as many times as you like.
Keep voting! I just voted for my 10 family members. Up to 67%.
dont suggest that to him. Goddy11 is an adelaide crows stooge and is in favour of ******* up the league
Don't presume I am an Crows stooge. WWT is my SANFL side always. AFC is my AFL side always. No middle ground. I don't like the AFL sides in. Terrible to see our players playing against us. Just saying the Advertiser poll is open manipulation and it looks like it has been.
by matt35 » Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:02 am
by goddy11 » Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:07 am
by tipper » Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:28 am
goddy11 wrote:
I just tried it and added 3 votes to the "yes for sure" total. I don't know why but there is a return to poll button at the bottom of the results box that allows you to do it. (Note that I have an Advertiser digital membership that may allow me additional votes.).
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:44 am
tipper wrote:goddy11 wrote:
I just tried it and added 3 votes to the "yes for sure" total. I don't know why but there is a return to poll button at the bottom of the results box that allows you to do it. (Note that I have an Advertiser digital membership that may allow me additional votes.).
interesting, thats exactly what i did, and it didnt add any numbers to the poll. the membership may be the difference.
anyway, it is no different to any other online poll the advertiser conducts. they can all be "abused". they spruik the results of the ones that show what they want them to, and quietly delete the ones that dont. it wont prove anything either way
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:50 am
tipper wrote:just voted. its up to 70% think that the sanfl would be better without them. watch the poll be quickly swept under the carpet when the advertiser offices open this morning
by Apachebulldog » Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:54 am
robranisgod wrote:I was able to read the article and then vote by simply googling "Let Grudges Go" and then accessing the article that way.
by Magellan » Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:04 am
therisingblues wrote:tipper wrote:just voted. its up to 70% think that the sanfl would be better without them. watch the poll be quickly swept under the carpet when the advertiser offices open this morning
Without any knowledge of how the poll turned out, or how the advertiser is spinning it, I'll add stick my neck out and back this prediction.
Dies anyone have access to the poll and the spin this morning?
by Magellan » Thu Sep 08, 2016 12:11 pm
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 08, 2016 12:52 pm
Magellan wrote:For those that can access the Crudvertiser and are interested, Warren Partland is holding a blog session on the reserves issue from 12:30pm today.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6901ed2254
THE SANFL clubs are nervous in the wake of Adelaide’s smashing of Central District in the elimination final.
The Crows belted the Doggies by 72 points and take on South Adelaide this Sunday from 12.10pm.
SANFL clubs are worried that crowd numbers will continue to drop if Adelaide becomes a powerhouse in the league. Are they justified in their concerns?
Blog with Warren Partland in the comments section below from 12.30pm today.
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 08, 2016 12:52 pm
Magellan wrote:For those that can access the Crudvertiser and are interested, Warren Partland is holding a blog session on the reserves issue from 12:30pm today.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6901ed2254
THE SANFL clubs are nervous in the wake of Adelaide’s smashing of Central District in the elimination final.
The Crows belted the Doggies by 72 points and take on South Adelaide this Sunday from 12.10pm.
SANFL clubs are worried that crowd numbers will continue to drop if Adelaide becomes a powerhouse in the league. Are they justified in their concerns?
Blog with Warren Partland in the comments section below from 12.30pm today.
by Booney » Thu Sep 08, 2016 1:51 pm
therisingblues wrote:Magellan wrote:For those that can access the Crudvertiser and are interested, Warren Partland is holding a blog session on the reserves issue from 12:30pm today.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6901ed2254
THE SANFL clubs are nervous in the wake of Adelaide’s smashing of Central District in the elimination final.
The Crows belted the Doggies by 72 points and take on South Adelaide this Sunday from 12.10pm.
SANFL clubs are worried that crowd numbers will continue to drop if Adelaide becomes a powerhouse in the league. Are they justified in their concerns?
Blog with Warren Partland in the comments section below from 12.30pm today.
As I said before, my guess is that subscribers to the Advertiser would mostly be of the AFL variety owing to the massive coverage of that competition offered by the Advertiser. On the other hand, if I want SANFL coverage I seldom fund it in the Advertiser. I wish we could get our voice better heard, from my stand point Roy Laird's comments have really thrust our complaint right out into the spotlight at least now these articles are proliferating, it won't be much longer until they get all the issues correct also.
by tipper » Thu Sep 08, 2016 1:57 pm
Booney wrote:therisingblues wrote:Magellan wrote:For those that can access the Crudvertiser and are interested, Warren Partland is holding a blog session on the reserves issue from 12:30pm today.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6901ed2254
THE SANFL clubs are nervous in the wake of Adelaide’s smashing of Central District in the elimination final.
The Crows belted the Doggies by 72 points and take on South Adelaide this Sunday from 12.10pm.
SANFL clubs are worried that crowd numbers will continue to drop if Adelaide becomes a powerhouse in the league. Are they justified in their concerns?
Blog with Warren Partland in the comments section below from 12.30pm today.
As I said before, my guess is that subscribers to the Advertiser would mostly be of the AFL variety owing to the massive coverage of that competition offered by the Advertiser. On the other hand, if I want SANFL coverage I seldom fund it in the Advertiser. I wish we could get our voice better heard, from my stand point Roy Laird's comments have really thrust our complaint right out into the spotlight at least now these articles are proliferating, it won't be much longer until they get all the issues correct also.
Indeed. No wonder hits on the shithouse SANFL site, Facebook and Twitter accounts has increased, there's barely any coverage in the mainstream media so you have to go and find it somewhere.
by Wedgie » Thu Sep 08, 2016 1:58 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by UK Fan » Thu Sep 08, 2016 5:28 pm
Wedgie wrote:Twitter and Facebook hits are 100% up on 1960, the SANFL is saved!
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by bennymacca » Thu Sep 08, 2016 5:46 pm
Wedgie wrote:Twitter and Facebook hits are 100% up on 1960, the SANFL is saved!
by Dogs72 » Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:26 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |