matt35 wrote:Thompson will play mostly SANFL next season. Of course he can step up to AFL if needed but the Crows have made it very clear that he will mostly be an SANFL player.
Does he get squeezed out when they have no one on the injury list?
by Dutchy » Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:32 am
matt35 wrote:Thompson will play mostly SANFL next season. Of course he can step up to AFL if needed but the Crows have made it very clear that he will mostly be an SANFL player.
by sib » Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:56 am
Dutchy wrote:matt35 wrote:Thompson will play mostly SANFL next season. Of course he can step up to AFL if needed but the Crows have made it very clear that he will mostly be an SANFL player.
Does he get squeezed out when they have no one on the injury list?
by Dutchy » Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:11 pm
sib wrote:Dutchy wrote:matt35 wrote:Thompson will play mostly SANFL next season. Of course he can step up to AFL if needed but the Crows have made it very clear that he will mostly be an SANFL player.
Does he get squeezed out when they have no one on the injury list?
NO as he is still an AFL listed player unlike Carey.
He should play mainly SANFl next year and captain it.
by human_torpedo » Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:53 pm
therisingblues wrote:I guess I'm just being suspicious. If this ends up being a method of squeezing another player in to the Ravens, instead of a top up, I'll have fair reason to be upset. Maybe I've jumped the gun, but I think it's fair to say they've got a history of getting a foot in the door based on one premise, then behaving against that premise, based purely on the fact that they now have a foot in the door.
I'd wager that this is not just a new title, but the precedent for squeezing better footballers into a side already teeming with dollars far beyond the SANFL cap.
by Magellan » Tue Oct 11, 2016 5:00 pm
am Bays wrote:People's thoughts on Scott Thompson being on on-field "setter of playing standards" coach for the Crows state league team next year???
by therisingblues » Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:14 pm
human_torpedo wrote:therisingblues wrote:I guess I'm just being suspicious. If this ends up being a method of squeezing another player in to the Ravens, instead of a top up, I'll have fair reason to be upset. Maybe I've jumped the gun, but I think it's fair to say they've got a history of getting a foot in the door based on one premise, then behaving against that premise, based purely on the fact that they now have a foot in the door.
I'd wager that this is not just a new title, but the precedent for squeezing better footballers into a side already teeming with dollars far beyond the SANFL cap.
Utilising a spot on the senior list to benefit the SANFL side? You honestly think that would be the sole reason behind giving Thommo a contract? To spite the SANFL and to strengthen the Crows reserves side?
I understand you don't like them in the comp, neither do I, but seriously some of the crap that gets thrown around here is ludicrous
by human_torpedo » Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:27 am
by LPH » Wed Oct 12, 2016 9:01 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Oct 12, 2016 9:18 am
by therisingblues » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:17 am
human_torpedo wrote:Have a re read of the above post of your I quoted. You are talking about a senior contracted AFL player on the list. Not a top up, or a fabricated position to suit them, A player on the senior list.
'I'd wager that this is not just a new title, but the precedent for squeezing better footballers into a side already teeming with dollars far beyond the SANFL cap' - That is the kind of crap I was referring to. How the Crows utilise their senior list is entirely up to them. Had Thommo been signed as a 'senior SANFL player' outside the AFL cap and not on the senior list, then you may have grounds for complaint or feel hard done by
by human_torpedo » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:35 am
by therisingblues » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:43 am
by Magellan » Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:29 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:I see Bohdan has resigned at North.
by daysofourlives » Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:43 am
by Jim05 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:22 am
daysofourlives wrote:I heard Jarman reported on MMM that the clubs want to cap the Crows at 16 listed players, im not sure if it was just for finals or all season.
The crows have threatened to go to the VFL if it is passed.
Please please go and take the scum with you
by therisingblues » Sun Oct 23, 2016 11:59 am
Jim05 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:I heard Jarman reported on MMM that the clubs want to cap the Crows at 16 listed players, im not sure if it was just for finals or all season.
The crows have threatened to go to the VFL if it is passed.
Please please go and take the scum with you
Yep, seeya later carnts
by Magellan » Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:09 pm
by Mic » Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:11 pm
Magellan wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:I see Bohdan has resigned at North.
daysofourlives wrote:I heard Jarman reported on MMM that the clubs want to cap the Crows at 16 listed players, im not sure if it was just for finals or all season.
The crows have threatened to go to the VFL if it is passed.
Please please go and take the scum with you
by goddy11 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:14 pm
daysofourlives wrote:I heard Jarman reported on MMM that the clubs want to cap the Crows at 16 listed players, im not sure if it was just for finals or all season.
The crows have threatened to go to the VFL if it is passed.
Please please go and take the scum with you
by RB » Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:36 pm
Jim05 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:I heard Jarman reported on MMM that the clubs want to cap the Crows at 16 listed players, im not sure if it was just for finals or all season.
The crows have threatened to go to the VFL if it is passed.
Please please go and take the scum with you
Yep, seeya later carnts
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |