by MW » Tue Aug 01, 2017 10:04 am
by MatteeG » Tue Aug 01, 2017 10:16 am
amber_fluid wrote:MatteeG wrote:Gozu wrote:They were saying on Footy Classified last week that Riewoldt wanted to play on next year and he and his management were disappointed the club were still dicking him around whether to give him another contract, I guess they just gave him their decision.
Champion player.
Took what I still rate as the best mark I've seen v Sydney.
That's the one where he runs back with the flight of the ball with no regards at all for his own safety?
Sensational/courageous mark.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by MW » Tue Aug 01, 2017 10:28 am
by woodublieve12 » Tue Aug 01, 2017 10:29 am
MW wrote:Any news on how Dangerfield is going? fair dinkum....I can't escape it. it's all anyone is talking about.
by MW » Tue Aug 01, 2017 10:33 am
woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:Any news on how Dangerfield is going? fair dinkum....I can't escape it. it's all anyone is talking about.
All the attention on Nick, but all I've bloody heard is Dangerfield
by Booney » Tue Aug 01, 2017 10:36 am
by Spargo » Tue Aug 01, 2017 10:41 am
Booney wrote:Well, if you've had enough Dangerfield talk it's probably best you log on and talk about it some more.
by MW » Tue Aug 01, 2017 10:42 am
Booney wrote:Well, if you've had enough Dangerfield talk it's probably best you log on and talk about it some more.
by woodublieve12 » Tue Aug 01, 2017 10:55 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:00 am
by nuggety goodness » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:02 am
Imagine if Cotchin won it... he would be the best bridesmaid ever... steve bradbury-esqueJim05 wrote:carey wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:With Dusty sitting on two strikes it could be a very strange Brownlow night if both Danger and Dusty have the asterisk next to their name.
We were talking about that at tea tonight who's on the rung?
Tom Mitchell?
I seriously can't think of any others that have been consistently outstanding.
Crouch has good numbers but certainly not for mine, Sloane and Wines will get a lot of votes early. Zach Merrett? Kelly?
Mitchell and my smoky would be Cotchin.
by JK » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:05 am
by cracka » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:09 am
nuggety goodness wrote:Imagine if Cotchin won it... he would be the best bridesmaid ever... steve bradbury-esqueJim05 wrote:carey wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:With Dusty sitting on two strikes it could be a very strange Brownlow night if both Danger and Dusty have the asterisk next to their name.
We were talking about that at tea tonight who's on the rung?
Tom Mitchell?
I seriously can't think of any others that have been consistently outstanding.
Crouch has good numbers but certainly not for mine, Sloane and Wines will get a lot of votes early. Zach Merrett? Kelly?
Mitchell and my smoky would be Cotchin.
Gets handed the 2012 brownlow after finishing equal 2nd...
Gets handed the 2017 brownlow after finishing third...
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
by Jim05 » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:16 am
cracka wrote:Imagine if Cotchin won it... he would be the best bridesmaid ever... steve bradbury-esquenuggety goodness wrote:Jim05 wrote:carey wrote:[quote="Senor Moto Gadili"]With Dusty sitting on two strikes it could be a very strange Brownlow night if both Danger and Dusty have the asterisk next to their name.
We were talking about that at tea tonight who's on the rung?
Tom Mitchell?
I seriously can't think of any others that have been consistently outstanding.
Crouch has good numbers but certainly not for mine, Sloane and Wines will get a lot of votes early. Zach Merrett? Kelly?
Mitchell and my smoky would be Cotchin.
Gets handed the 2012 brownlow after finishing equal 2nd...
Gets handed the 2017 brownlow after finishing third...
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
by saintal » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:24 am
JK wrote:I appreciate what the AFL is trying to do with reducing incidences of concussion, and personally think PD's a bit of a flog, but hate seeing him get rubbed out for that.
Concussion is a possibility in almost every sport, it's unfortunate, but it's the risk so many choose to take at any level. Think this was just one of those unfortunate occurrences.
by MW » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:53 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The break will be good for Danger.
We were never going to win v Swans they have us covered easily.
by Booney » Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:56 am
by Feenix » Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:34 pm
by MW » Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:35 pm
Feenix wrote:I hope Danger gets the most votes in the Brownlow so the AFL is forced to look at the fairest criteria for winning the Brownlow. Hopefully it forces them to look at these tackles too, you should be punished for your actions not the outcomes
by Feenix » Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:39 pm
Because there are more reports in the modern game for things that wouldn't have even been looked at twice in past. Anything involving the head is a couple of weeks whether it is malicious or notMW wrote:Feenix wrote:I hope Danger gets the most votes in the Brownlow so the AFL is forced to look at the fairest criteria for winning the Brownlow. Hopefully it forces them to look at these tackles too, you should be punished for your actions not the outcomes
Why should they address the 'fairest' part now?
McKernan and Grant would like to know...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |