by King » Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:12 pm
by petoe » Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:21 am
by shoe boy » Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:42 am
King wrote:Give credit where credit is due. The Shoes B Grade (that's one below A) were very very good!!!!
by shoe boy » Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:43 am
petoe wrote:Shoe boy, have you found it yet?.........
by Front & Centre » Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:41 am
grumpyoldman wrote:Keefy wrote:Bluedemon wrote:Read on the SFL facebook page something happened in the Girls Under 16 GF
Both teams had unqualified players
SFL need to read their by -laws in particular By law 4 , Team Sheets 4.2 i) The Name and number of each participating player. Apparently this was how the HVFC team sheet was therefore players name with number would have been the ones that played. Sounds like the SFL are weak and cant even conform to their own by laws in regards to non qualified players. If its good enough to disqualify Porties A grade then the Christies u/16 girls is no different, can understand the rumour that Porties are looking to leave SFL and go to Adelaide Footy League.
by woodublieve12 » Mon Sep 25, 2017 11:27 am
by Front & Centre » Mon Sep 25, 2017 11:50 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Gee, surprised you even follow HV all you do is bag the place
by oneuponedown » Mon Sep 25, 2017 1:44 pm
Front & Centre wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Gee, surprised you even follow HV all you do is bag the place
Incorrect - however I have been around long enough to remember what is was like to be a great well run club which it currently isn't
by grumpyoldman » Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:22 pm
oneuponedown wrote:Front & Centre wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Gee, surprised you even follow HV all you do is bag the place
Incorrect - however I have been around long enough to remember what is was like to be a great well run club which it currently isn't
hmmmnnn, F &C what constitutes a great well run club?
oneuponedown wrote:Front & Centre wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Gee, surprised you even follow HV all you do is bag the place
Incorrect - however I have been around long enough to remember what is was like to be a great well run club which it currently isn't
hmmmnnn, F &C what constitutes a great well run club?
oneuponedown wrote:Front & Centre wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Gee, surprised you even follow HV all you do is bag the place
Incorrect - however I have been around long enough to remember what is was like to be a great well run club which it currently isn't
hmmmnnn, F &C what constitutes a great well run club?
oneuponedown wrote:Front & Centre wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Gee, surprised you even follow HV all you do is bag the place
Incorrect - however I have been around long enough to remember what is was like to be a great well run club which it currently isn't
hmmmnnn, F &C what constitutes a great well run club?
Front & Centre wrote:grumpyoldman wrote:Keefy wrote:Bluedemon wrote:Read on the SFL facebook page something happened in the Girls Under 16 GF
Both teams had unqualified players
SFL need to read their by -laws in particular By law 4 , Team Sheets 4.2 i) The Name and number of each participating player. Apparently this was how the HVFC team sheet was therefore players name with number would have been the ones that played. Sounds like the SFL are weak and cant even conform to their own by laws in regards to non qualified players. If its good enough to disqualify Porties A grade then the Christies u/16 girls is no different, can understand the rumour that Porties are looking to leave SFL and go to Adelaide Footy League.
GOM Can I please give you some advice
1- HV made errors and if they apologised to the players and their families maybe the kids wouldn't have been so upset. By dragging it on you are making the club look like fools
2 - I have asked one of the SFL Directors who has been involved about this and apparently HV story changed during the course of the investigation so maybe you need to clarify this with the club
3 - The timing of your post and the facebook post on SFL GF day just highlights that HV didn't have players playing in the biggest day of the SFL year
4 - Club's attention should be on getting an A grade coach. They have known for months that BC wasn't going on and we are all still waiting
Bring on the AGM. I hope someone else will put their hand up so we can get some smart people in charge again
by grumpyoldman » Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:24 pm
by Front & Centre » Mon Sep 25, 2017 3:58 pm
grumpyoldman wrote:Well FC you obviously have all the answers so why not put your hand up and nominate for President or would that blow your cover?
by petoe » Mon Sep 25, 2017 5:35 pm
shoe boy wrote:petoe wrote:Shoe boy, have you found it yet?.........
I am always looking for it.
by Mister Footy » Mon Sep 25, 2017 6:16 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:45 am
by godra » Tue Sep 26, 2017 5:06 pm
by Broken Down Hack » Tue Sep 26, 2017 5:24 pm
Mister Footy wrote:Well done to Rod Mitchell and the bushpigs. If only he'd stayed at Happy Valley
Any news on the clubs that are looking for coaches? How many clubs still looking?
by No kidding » Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:27 pm
godra wrote:With OSB/L confirmed as leaving the SFL and with Marion essentially all but confirmed as leaving, how do people feel with the Amateur League slowly infiltrating what the maroon coats would certainly classify as "their turf"? On one hand they now have one, possibly two less teams which provided score blow outs to worry about and manage but at the same time, two less teams to bring in revenue. Will all teams be happy with the remaining teams in 2018?
I think the SFL would be genuinely fearful for the future of the league in coming years.
by cracka » Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:36 pm
by Down the Hill » Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:59 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Sep 26, 2017 10:38 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |