by morell » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:04 pm
by Dutchy » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:12 pm
morell wrote:They pretty much did, they weren't going to use 91, just meant it got sorted earlier and provided Gibson with some clarity.
by MW » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:14 pm
Dutchy wrote:Bombers4EVA wrote::shock:Booney wrote:Ablett 2 year deal.
Gibbs 4 years hat happened to the one year at a time when post 30?
Why the **** did Crows trade for Gibson? Didn't realise they could get him for free?
by Dutchy » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:17 pm
by morell » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:18 pm
Only a certain number of spots on the list. Youd assume they know what they've got planned by nowDutchy wrote:morell wrote:They pretty much did, they weren't going to use 91, just meant it got sorted earlier and provided Gibson with some clarity.
plenty of other ways to do that, what is things change and they need to use it?
by bennymacca » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:23 pm
Dutchy wrote:morell wrote:They pretty much did, they weren't going to use 91, just meant it got sorted earlier and provided Gibson with some clarity.
plenty of other ways to do that, what is things change and they need to use it?
by bennymacca » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:24 pm
morell wrote:Only a certain number of spots on the list. Youd assume they know what they've got planned by nowDutchy wrote:morell wrote:They pretty much did, they weren't going to use 91, just meant it got sorted earlier and provided Gibson with some clarity.
plenty of other ways to do that, what is things change and they need to use it?
It would've been a courtesy for Gibson. imagine waiting the however many weeks not knowing for certain that you've got a spot. Would be awful.
Actually think it was a classy thing to do from Adelaide.
by MW » Thu Oct 19, 2017 10:25 pm
Dutchy wrote:29 by the time the season starts, plus 4 years =
by LMA » Thu Oct 19, 2017 11:19 pm
MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:29 by the time the season starts, plus 4 years =
Boomer says hi lol
by LaughingKookaburra » Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:15 am
by Brodlach » Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:15 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by stan » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:50 am
Just your standard trolling. You guys had a pretty solid tradr period.Brodlach wrote:Means he can move over earlier and get settled before pre season starts with his family. Some people look for things that aren’t there
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:53 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:The Crows obviously wanted Gibson as a top up and weren't confident he'd be in the draft at 91 still. Reckon there also was some good will there also which makes me think is there something that both Adelaide and North know that no one else knows in say 12 months time....
by Booney » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:55 am
by Dutchy » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:57 am
MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:29 by the time the season starts, plus 4 years =
Boomer says hi lol
by Dutchy » Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:58 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:The Crows obviously wanted Gibson as a top up and weren't confident he'd be in the draft at 91 still. Reckon there also was some good will there also which makes me think is there something that both Adelaide and North know that no one else knows in say 12 months time....
by MW » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:00 am
by Dutchy » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:00 am
bennymacca wrote:Dutchy wrote:morell wrote:They pretty much did, they weren't going to use 91, just meant it got sorted earlier and provided Gibson with some clarity.
plenty of other ways to do that, what is things change and they need to use it?
what things would change between now and then that would make us think shit we have to use pick 91.
I went back as far as the year 2000 and the only person taken at 91 or later was Dean Polo to St Kilda, who was a delisted player from Richmond
12 and 39 plus Greenwood Rookie upgrade 77 will be all we do.
by Booney » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:15 am
MW wrote:Dutchy wrote:29 by the time the season starts, plus 4 years =
Boomer says hi lol
by mots02 » Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:18 am
Dutchy wrote:bennymacca wrote:Dutchy wrote:morell wrote:They pretty much did, they weren't going to use 91, just meant it got sorted earlier and provided Gibson with some clarity.
plenty of other ways to do that, what is things change and they need to use it?
what things would change between now and then that would make us think shit we have to use pick 91.
I went back as far as the year 2000 and the only person taken at 91 or later was Dean Polo to St Kilda, who was a delisted player from Richmond
12 and 39 plus Greenwood Rookie upgrade 77 will be all we do.
And if one of your players quits (Jaensch) or they want to make a late delisting? these options are now off the table when they could have gotten him for nothing!!!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |