hawks21 wrote:Not sure why the afl public is so torn on this one. This sort of 'bump' has been getting games for several years now (rightly or wrongly) under the past couple of MRP's
except for cotchin
by bennymacca » Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:59 am
hawks21 wrote:Not sure why the afl public is so torn on this one. This sort of 'bump' has been getting games for several years now (rightly or wrongly) under the past couple of MRP's
by Booney » Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:05 am
by bennymacca » Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:26 am
Booney wrote:Port Adelaide challenging the 1 match ban.
by Booney » Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:28 am
bennymacca wrote:Booney wrote:Port Adelaide challenging the 1 match ban.
will be interesting to see how many teams burn the 10k and challenge this year. i am guessing a lot more. Gray is on more than 10k per week so its not really that expensive.
these sorts of things heavily rely on the West coast medical report. I havent read it, but if it says mcgovern was concussed in any way, however minor, he wont be getting off
by Bombers4EVA » Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:30 am
by bennymacca » Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:31 am
Bombers4EVA wrote:Who is over-seeing the tribunal now?
by Booney » Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:46 am
bennymacca wrote:Every dollar over the soft cap just gets taxed basically, right? so it might cost you 15k instead of 10 if you have hit the cap.
Still not that much money.
I think it will go back to the says where clubs challenge the severity of the grading and try and reduce the penalty etc. But who cares. still better than the early plea rubbish
by Spargo » Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:50 am
by Brodlach » Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:09 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by The Bedge » Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:36 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Brodlach » Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:40 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Booney » Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:43 am
The Bedge wrote:What is a soft cap?
by The Bedge » Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:53 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by MW » Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:11 pm
by Booney » Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:41 pm
MW wrote:Do Port have their joint major sponsor signed up yet?
by Jim05 » Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:48 pm
Booney wrote:The Bedge wrote:What is a soft cap?
The football departments at each club has a "soft cap" that they run to, $9.5m, it's not to say you can't spend more than that, you can spend as much as you like, but anything over the $9.5m will be taxed.
It's hurt lots of assistant coaches the most, blokes like Ben Hart, Brett Montgomery and Mark Williams all left the AFL system for a year ( or in Williams' case longer ) because they couldn't get a job that was in a department under the "cap".
It's really to stop the likes of Collingwood spending $20m on their department ( because they can ) and then the likes of the Bulldogs do the same to "keep up with the Jones'" and compete.
by amber_fluid » Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:52 pm
Jim05 wrote:Booney wrote:The Bedge wrote:What is a soft cap?
The football departments at each club has a "soft cap" that they run to, $9.5m, it's not to say you can't spend more than that, you can spend as much as you like, but anything over the $9.5m will be taxed.
It's hurt lots of assistant coaches the most, blokes like Ben Hart, Brett Montgomery and Mark Williams all left the AFL system for a year ( or in Williams' case longer ) because they couldn't get a job that was in a department under the "cap".
It's really to stop the likes of Collingwood spending $20m on their department ( because they can ) and then the likes of the Bulldogs do the same to "keep up with the Jones'" and compete.
Who cares what clubs spend?
History has shown that there is little correlation between big spending and success. Collingwood and Essendon have 2 flags between them in the last 20 years despite spending heaps on their football spend.
by Bombers4EVA » Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:02 pm
bennymacca wrote:every dollar over the soft cap just gets taxed basically, right? so it might cost you 15k instead of 10 if you have hit the cap.
Still not that much money.
I think it will go back to the says where clubs challenge the severity of the grading and try and reduce the penalty etc. But who cares. still better than the early plea rubbishBombers4EVA wrote:Who is over-seeing the tribunal now?
Michael Christian is the sole panel member
by bennymacca » Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:05 pm
by Bombers4EVA » Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:07 pm
bennymacca wrote:Western Australian that played for Collingwood (used to be a commentator for ch10 back when they had the rights)
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |