by Booney » Thu Sep 13, 2018 4:23 pm
by Booney » Thu Sep 13, 2018 4:24 pm
by woodublieve12 » Thu Sep 13, 2018 4:26 pm
by JK » Thu Sep 13, 2018 4:31 pm
by Trader » Thu Sep 13, 2018 5:00 pm
by RB » Thu Sep 13, 2018 6:21 pm
Booney wrote:Hocking said the recent three rules trials in VFL games had resulted in a 15 per cent increase in scoring and a 14 per cent decrease in tackles.
by RB » Thu Sep 13, 2018 6:23 pm
Booney wrote:.The League footy boss said over the next year he hoped to at least halve the length of the Laws of the Game booklet, which runs to 83 pages.
by heater31 » Thu Sep 13, 2018 7:17 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Sep 13, 2018 7:27 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by LMA » Thu Sep 13, 2018 8:17 pm
by gadj1976 » Thu Sep 13, 2018 8:59 pm
by LMA » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:01 pm
by gadj1976 » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:03 pm
LMA wrote:One thing they will have to change but probably haven't thought of with 666 is getting rid of the centre bounce.
With no extra men in defence imagine 30 seconds to go, less than a goal the difference and the bounce clearly favours the team trying to win.
by The Bedge » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:07 pm
LMA wrote:One thing they will have to change but probably haven't thought of with 666 is getting rid of the centre bounce.
With no extra men in defence imagine 30 seconds to go, less than a goal the difference and the bounce clearly favours the team trying to win.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by LMA » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:09 pm
gadj1976 wrote:I heard that this year held the record for most goal-less quarters in a season (can't find the link).
Most of this would be fixed if they re-allowed the third man up which cleared the area and got the ball moving.
Ridiculous idea to ban it which has had adverse affects, causing additional ridiculous rule changes. Moronic.
by LMA » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:11 pm
The Bedge wrote:LMA wrote:One thing they will have to change but probably haven't thought of with 666 is getting rid of the centre bounce.
With no extra men in defence imagine 30 seconds to go, less than a goal the difference and the bounce clearly favours the team trying to win.
The AFL would probably absolutely love that situation.
by Corona Man » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:17 pm
LMA wrote:The Bedge wrote:LMA wrote:One thing they will have to change but probably haven't thought of with 666 is getting rid of the centre bounce.
With no extra men in defence imagine 30 seconds to go, less than a goal the difference and the bounce clearly favours the team trying to win.
The AFL would probably absolutely love that situation.
Yep and then declare it a success, love to see it happen to a Scott
by The Bedge » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:19 pm
LMA wrote:The Bedge wrote:LMA wrote:One thing they will have to change but probably haven't thought of with 666 is getting rid of the centre bounce.
With no extra men in defence imagine 30 seconds to go, less than a goal the difference and the bounce clearly favours the team trying to win.
The AFL would probably absolutely love that situation.
Yep and then declare it a success, love to see it happen to a Scott
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by daysofourlives » Thu Sep 13, 2018 9:34 pm
Trader wrote:What happens if after a goal, you run to the bench and the new player comes on, but doesn't quite make it into the arc in time? A free kick is going to be paid? That seems unreasonable.
by bennymacca » Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:51 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |