by holden78 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:25 am
by holden78 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:34 am
Wedgie wrote:JK wrote:Wedgie be having a huge birthday, might be some entertaining posts tonight
I'm happy but ******* exhausted. I gave up when the Eagles were more than 7 goals up.
In absolute shock.
I hugged strangers, I cried, I laughed, I jumped up and down, I cheered, I sang. I'm ******.
Got my cock out a few times today.
Best birthday ever.
by Booney » Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:52 am
by PatowalongaPirate » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:01 am
Booney wrote:The longer this goes on the more likely it seems there's going to be an interesting outcome.
by Dogs64 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:02 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:10 am
by Jim05 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:11 am
by David Brent » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:17 am
by Half Back Flanker » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:23 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Did the 4th umpire know about the 19th man?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:25 am
Half Back Flanker wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Did the 4th umpire know about the 19th man?
Yes.......their response was "North will get fined"
by Footy Chick » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:28 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by mots02 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:28 am
Booney wrote:The longer this goes on the more likely it seems there's going to be an interesting outcome.
by knowledge » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:50 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Half Back Flanker wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Did the 4th umpire know about the 19th man?
Yes.......their response was "North will get fined"
That is staggering.
4th umpire will be looking for a new job.
by wild dog » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:05 am
Footy Chick wrote:When you look at the legalities, I'm not sure they could overturn it.
1) The rule specifically states that the captain or acting captain must alert the on-field field umpire and request the count - this didn't happen. The boundary rider alerting the interchange steward or the 4th umpire isn't an official request for a head count, which is why nothing would've been done. SO calling for the 4th umpires head is stupid
Biggles and Roo carrying on this morning about how it isn't the captains problem to be doing this stuff. Fairly clueless remarks from both, considering the amount of games they've played between them.
Footy Chick wrote:2) Umpires signed off on the card afterwards
No point in crying about it after the fact if you didn't follow the correct procedure to have the infringement rectified in the first place.
If they do overturn it, the Rooster will probably cop a massive fine from the SANFL to make up for the tickets that no-one will now buy
by Jim05 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:10 am
by Spargo » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:10 am
knowledge wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Half Back Flanker wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Did the 4th umpire know about the 19th man?
Yes.......their response was "North will get fined"
That is staggering.
4th umpire will be looking for a new job.
Not so staggering given the quality of glass-jawed prima donna umpires we have in this state. And it starts at the top. Incompetence personified.
by Spargo » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:12 am
Jim05 wrote:Eagles training this arvo and their CEO has said the club is exploring legal avenues
by Jim05 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:13 am
Spargo wrote:Jim05 wrote:Eagles training this arvo and their CEO has said the club is exploring legal avenues
Meanwhile, Norwood are just sitting back laughing.
by wild dog » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:15 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |