Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Anything to do with the history of the SANFL

Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby WRxb0y » Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:43 am

Spelly;

With Port being out of the finals race once again, How many times have Port missed the finals and what years were they please.
If my memory serves me, Port played the first round of the finals in 2006, but got bungled out ??

spanx :D
Doin it Doggie Style !! 2008
User avatar
WRxb0y
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:43 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby Mickyj » Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:09 pm

Don't forget WRxb0y the year the SANFL changed the finals back to a final four but had to change back the next year because port finished fifth.
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby spell_check » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:57 pm

Since a finals system has been in operation, 13 times.

1900, 1922, 1923, 1933, 1948, 1949, 1969, 1983, 1985, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 226 times

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby johntheclaret » Sun Sep 02, 2007 8:54 pm

spell_check wrote:Since a finals system has been in operation, 13 times.

1900, 1922, 1923, 1933, 1948, 1949, 1969, 1983, 1985, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007.


Another prime example of how the AvFL have f$%ked up the SANFL
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby BPBRB » Sun Sep 02, 2007 8:59 pm

johntheclaret wrote:
spell_check wrote:Since a finals system has been in operation, 13 times.

1900, 1922, 1923, 1933, 1948, 1949, 1969, 1983, 1985, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007.


Another prime example of how the AvFL have f$%ked up the SANFL


Why - Port Adelaide deserves it's time struggling for awhile although compared to many other clubs it is not really sturggling given the records of most teams at some stretch in their histories.

A couple of wooden spoons in the struggling years wouldn't go astray either. They have had a heap of success so stiff sh*t to them - they never gave a flying **** about anyone else when they were winning flags and playing finals every year!

I can't see how the AFL is to blame for the Port Adelaide Magpies failures?
BPBRB
 

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby Mickyj » Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:06 pm

BPBRB wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:
spell_check wrote:Since a finals system has been in operation, 13 times.

1900, 1922, 1923, 1933, 1948, 1949, 1969, 1983, 1985, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007.


Another prime example of how the AvFL have f$%ked up the SANFL


Why - Port Adelaide deserves it's time struggling for awhile although compared to many other clubs it is not really sturggling given the records of most teams at some stretch in their histories.

A couple of wooden spoons in the struggling years wouldn't go astray either. They have had a heap of success so stiff sh*t to them - they never gave a flying **** about anyone else when they were winning flags and playing finals every year!

I can't see how the AFL is to blame for the Port Adelaide Magpies failures?


I like your passion BPBRB.Everything you have written is spot on the mark. Let them finish down the bottom for a few years and feel what thats like.
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby Hondo » Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:46 pm

Centrals proved how to win regardless of what the AFL does - no club can use that as an excuse.

I also struggle to see:

1 Why it's so terrible for the comp that Port are having a lean run - geez, their AFL build up in the 90s sure snagged them some SANFL premierships

2 Why 1 team having a lean run means the SANFL is stuffed up?
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby WRxb0y » Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:18 pm

Thanx Spelly..
Doin it Doggie Style !! 2008
User avatar
WRxb0y
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:43 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby HeartBeatsTrue » Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:22 am

spell_check wrote:Since a finals system has been in operation, 13 times.

1900, 1922, 1923, 1933, 1948, 1949, 1969, 1983, 1985, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007.


Spelly, would that make them the only club to have won more premierships (since the introduction of finals series) than years not competing in finals?
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:24 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Pooraka

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:43 am

Great question HBT.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby LPH » Mon Sep 03, 2007 1:15 pm

Why are we discussing Port ??? :evil:

Irrelevent !!! :roll:

Anyone flying a plane or two over Alberton Oval next week ??? :wink:
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Location: Craven Cottage
Has liked: 541 times
Been liked: 326 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby spell_check » Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:06 pm

HeartBeatsTrue wrote:
spell_check wrote:Since a finals system has been in operation, 13 times.

1900, 1922, 1923, 1933, 1948, 1949, 1969, 1983, 1985, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007.


Spelly, would that make them the only club to have won more premierships (since the introduction of finals series) than years not competing in finals?


Yes.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 226 times

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby brent » Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:44 pm

i'd love to see port take the wooden spoon

*

heh
brent
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 11:19 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby johntheclaret » Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:34 am

BPBRB wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:
spell_check wrote:Since a finals system has been in operation, 13 times.

1900, 1922, 1923, 1933, 1948, 1949, 1969, 1983, 1985, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007.


Another prime example of how the AvFL have f$%ked up the SANFL


Why - Port Adelaide deserves it's time struggling for awhile although compared to many other clubs it is not really sturggling given the records of most teams at some stretch in their histories.

A couple of wooden spoons in the struggling years wouldn't go astray either. They have had a heap of success so stiff sh*t to them - they never gave a flying **** about anyone else when they were winning flags and playing finals every year!

I can't see how the AFL is to blame for the Port Adelaide Magpies failures?



BPBRB, Hondo Mickyj,

My point wasn't whether PAM deserve to have a bad run, whether they desreve to get the spoon or 1 team having a lean run means the SANFL is stuffed up.

The points I was making was in reference to the apparent correlation between the number of times PAM has failed to reach the finals since Port Adelaide joined the AvFL
And how this seemed to be another effect on the SANFL by the AvFL, along with the draft system taking the best players, the effect on crowds etc.

Personally, during my time I always looked on Port as Norths big rivals and saw some great grudge matches between the two, and for that reason, I am very happy to see them missing the finals :wink:
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: Question for Spelly regarding the Finals

Postby FlyingHigh » Wed Sep 05, 2007 10:56 am

I agree jtc - the AFL have f*&ked this up for us, because while the Maggies are having a bad run, all the so-called Port supporters are off following that other thing, so you feel bad rubbing it in to the few who remain loyal to the maggies, thus denying us a bit of payback gloating for all the years of pain they caused us.
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4911
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 182 times


Board index   Football  SANFL History Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |