Booney wrote:Hearing Port are set to omit a big name or two this week.
Hope there is outrage like when Bruce Gibbs or Josh Jenkins was dropped
by Brodlach » Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:11 am
Booney wrote:Hearing Port are set to omit a big name or two this week.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by stan » Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:18 am
I always felt that Bruce was better than Bryce.Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:Hearing Port are set to omit a big name or two this week.
Hope there is outrage like when Bruce Gibbs or Josh Jenkins was dropped
by stan » Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:19 am
Probably Ryder and Motlop.Booney wrote:Hearing Port are set to omit a big name or two this week.
by Booney » Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:24 am
stan wrote:Probably Ryder and Motlop.Booney wrote:Hearing Port are set to omit a big name or two this week.
by MW » Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:35 am
by Jim05 » Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:39 am
MW wrote:Kane on it this morning. Reckons Westoff, S.Gray and Ryder likely to be omitted
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:00 am
Booney wrote:Hearing Port are set to omit a big name or two this week.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:01 am
stan wrote:Probably Ryder and Motlop.Booney wrote:Hearing Port are set to omit a big name or two this week.
by stan » Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:07 am
It's the Adelaide media, isn't everyone a big name?Booney wrote:stan wrote:Probably Ryder and Motlop.Booney wrote:Hearing Port are set to omit a big name or two this week.
Motlop isn't a big name.
by Brodlach » Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:48 am
stan wrote:I always felt that Bruce was better than Bryce.Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:Hearing Port are set to omit a big name or two this week.
Hope there is outrage like when Bruce Gibbs or Josh Jenkins was dropped
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Brodlach » Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:49 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:51 am
Brodlach wrote:Is having Dixon and Ryder up forward too top heavy for a night game?
by Booney » Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:52 am
Brodlach wrote:Is having Dixon and Ryder up forward too top heavy for a night game?
by Bum Crack » Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:56 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Brodlach wrote:Is having Dixon and Ryder up forward too top heavy for a night game?
If it's wet, yes.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:20 am
Bum Crack wrote:going to be a cracker of a night weather wise. Bugger all wind but might be a bit dewy. If they have Dixon and Ryder up forward, it will be easy pickings for our defence. Hope they do play forward
by Booney » Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:26 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Bum Crack wrote:going to be a cracker of a night weather wise. Bugger all wind but might be a bit dewy. If they have Dixon and Ryder up forward, it will be easy pickings for our defence. Hope they do play forward
Will be dewy. Either way, Port don't play forwards, they make them run up and down the ground so they tire out moving forward.
I'd rather them two play traditional forward roles and we crumb off them via Rozee, Boak and Robbie, wont happen though, we'll leave the forward half open, kick it in long hoping that our runners can get forward quicker than Geelong's.
by Bum Crack » Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:27 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Bum Crack wrote:going to be a cracker of a night weather wise. Bugger all wind but might be a bit dewy. If they have Dixon and Ryder up forward, it will be easy pickings for our defence. Hope they do play forward
Will be dewy. Either way, Port don't play forwards, they make them run up and down the ground so they tire out moving forward.
I'd rather them two play traditional forward roles and we crumb off them via Rozee, Boak and Robbie, wont happen though, we'll leave the forward half open, kick it in long hoping that our runners can get forward quicker than Geelong's.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:37 am
Booney wrote:
There's about 18 sides that play like that mate.
by Booney » Wed Jun 19, 2019 12:04 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Booney wrote:
There's about 18 sides that play like that mate.
It worked in 2014 for us, hasn't since.
It baffles me why we even bothered pursuing Dixon if we still chose to go down this path, may aswell get a mosquito fleet up forward, stuff the tall defenders up with match ups, man for man, we have one of the strongest line-ups.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jun 19, 2019 12:07 pm
Booney wrote:
You haven't watched us bomb it on top of his head for the last 2 years?
Saying we just kick to open space just isn't right. It happens from time to time with every side the way the modern game is played. The ball is deep in defence, the forwards push up so the mids can push back deeper clogging up space, the ball comes out quick and you've got space to burn ( see Adelaide circa 2017 ).
Our problem has/was/is not moving the ball from the back half a) fast enough to use the space or b) well enough without coughing it up. When we do c) which is move it slow and actually hit targets the opposition mids get back and we bomb it on Dixon's head. ( See sentence one ).
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |